Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:50:57.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Opera talk: A philosophical ‘phantasie’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2008

Extract

The train of thought that I wish to pursue here was initiated by Edward T. Cone's recent essay ‘The World of Opera and its Inhabitants’. To the extent that my views diverge from his I suppose I may be taken for a critical adversary. But I prefer to think of the present effort as more a continuation and development of Professor Cone's ideas than an attempt to refute or criticise them. It is in the spirit of ongoing research rather than the more common one, in my profession, of philosophical confrontation that I offer remarks on the general questions, as posed by Cone: ‘How does the world of opera differ from other dramatic worlds? Who are the people that inhabit it, and what sorts of lives do they lead there?’ More particularly, my question is: What is the nature of operatic utterance? How are operatic characters ‘saying’?

In the first section of my paper I will present Professor Cone's answers to these questions. In the second I will go on what will appear, no doubt, to be a completely tangential excursion into R. G. Collingwood's philosophy of art. But in the final two sections I will try to weave these two seemingly disparate strands together into an answer of my own to the questions that Professor Cone has so insightfully raised. Perhaps ‘an answer of my own’ is too strong a phrase to use, implying something more like disagreement than is actually the case. So a better way of describing my whole enterprise, and the final sections especially, is ‘variations on a theme by Cone’.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cone, Edward T., ‘The World of Opera and its Inhabitants’, in Edward T. Cone, Music: A View from Delft, ed. Morgan, Robert P. (Chicago, 1989), 125–38.Google Scholar

2 Cone, , 125.Google Scholar

3 Cone, , 126.Google Scholar

4 Cone, , 126.Google Scholar

5 Cone, , 126.Google Scholar

6 Cone, , 127.Google Scholar

7 Cone, , 127.Google Scholar

8 Cone, , 127.Google Scholar

9 Cone, , 127–8.Google Scholar

10 Cone, , 131.Google Scholar

11 Cone, , 131.Google Scholar

12 Cone, , 132.Google Scholar

13 Cone, , 129.Google Scholar

14 Cone, , 135.Google Scholar

15 Collingwood, R. G., The Principles of Art (Oxford, 1938), 109–10.Google Scholar

16 Collingwood, , 114.Google Scholar

17 Collingwood, , 275.Google Scholar

18 Collingwood, , 282.Google Scholar

19 Collingwood, , 285.Google Scholar

20 Collingwood, , 275.Google Scholar

21 Cone, (see n. 1), 136–7.Google Scholar

22 Hamlet, Act III scene 2.Google Scholar

23 I fail to hear the gesture of disgust.