Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T04:25:03.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Creolization as Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2023

Anca Parvulescu*
Affiliation:
Washington University in St Louis
Manuela Boatcă
Affiliation:
University of Freiburg

Extract

“What took place in the Caribbean,” writes Édouard Glissant, “which could be summed up in the word creolization, approximates the idea of Relation as nearly as possible.”1 For Glissant, the word creolization condenses the history of the Caribbean. This is a history characterized by trans-border connections, culture flows, and the transregional movement of people and capital.2 As the first region to be colonized by Europe in the sixteenth century and the last one to be—incompletely—decolonized in the twentieth, the Caribbean has been shaped by the worldwide demand and supply of colonial labor. It was the destination of nearly half of all the enslaved Africans trafficked into the New World between 1492 and the end of the nineteenth century; of significant numbers of indentured and contracted European laborers during much of the same period; as well as of indentured Indian, Chinese, and Indonesian workers after the formal abolition of slavery at the end of the nineteenth century.3 Subsequently, the first half of the twentieth century saw the emergence of a circuit of intra-regional migration of a labor force to the larger Caribbean islands where US-led corporations operated. After World War II, when labor from the non-independent territories of the Caribbean was recruited to rebuild the postwar economies of western Europe and the United States, the region turned into a source of transcontinental emigration.4 On account of this history, the Caribbean has been theorized in terms of transculturation, creolization, and hybridity; concepts such as “remittance societies,” “circular migration,” or “diaspora,” widely used in transnational studies, have also been coined in relation to the Caribbean.5 More than these other terms, however, the concept of creolization has come to condense both the sedimentation and ramifications of this history.

Type
Forum
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Glissant, Édouard, Poetics of Relation, trans. Wing, Betsy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2010), 34 Google Scholar.

2 Schiller, Nina Glick, “Theorizing about and beyond Transnational Processes,” in Caribbean Migration to Western Europe and the United States: Essays on Incorporation, Identity, and Citizenship (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2008), 18 Google Scholar; Mintz, Sidney W., “The Localization of Anthropological Practice: From Area Studies to Transnationalism,” Critique of Anthropology 18, no. 2 (1998): 117–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Rediker, Marcus, The Slave Ship: A Human History (New York: Viking, 2007)Google Scholar; Mintz, Sidney W., Three Ancient Colonies: Caribbean Themes and Variations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cervantes-Rodríguez, Margarita, Grosfoguel, Ramón, and Mielants, Eric, eds., Caribbean Migration to Western Europe and the United States: Essays on Incorporation, Identity, and Citizenship (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2009)Google Scholar.

4 Cervantes-Rodríguez, Grosfoguel, and Mielants, Caribbean Migration to Western Europe and the United States.

5 Mintz, “The Localization of Anthropological Practice”; Nina Glick Schiller and Georges Eugene Fouron, Georges Woke Up Laughing: Long-Distance Nationalism and the Search for Home (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001).

6 Glissant, Poetics of Relation, 33.

7 Glissant, Poetics of Relation, 33.

8 Glissant, Poetics of Relation, 34. Glissant is distinguishing between creolization and creoleness—the latter as defined by Bernabé, Jean, Chamoiseau, Patrick, and Confiant, Raphaël, Éloge de la Créolité, trans. Taleb-Khyar, M. B. (Paris: Gallimard, 1993)Google Scholar.

9 Said, Edward W., “Traveling Theory,” in The Selected Works of Edward Said, 1966–2006, eds. Bayoumi, Moustafa and Rubin, Andrew (New York: Vintage Books, 2019), 197219 Google Scholar.

10 On worlding, see Cheah, Pheng, What Is a World? On Postcolonial Literature as World Literature (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016)Google Scholar.

11 Françoise Vergès and Carpanin Marimoutou, “Moorings: Indian Ocean Creolizations,” PORTAL: Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies 9 (June 29, 2012).

12 Kabir, Ananya Jahanara, “Elmina as Postcolonial Space: Transoceanic Creolization and the Fabric of Memory,” Interventions 22, no. 8 (2020): 9941012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ananya Jahanara Kabir, “Rapsodia Ibero-Indiana: Transoceanic Creolization and the Mando of Goa,” Modern Asian Studies, 55, no. 5 (2021) 1581-1636. Some of these ideas were developed in collaboration with the author Ari Gautier on their online platform le thinnai kreyol (May 2020–May 2022).

13 Cohen, Robin and Toninato, Paola, The Creolization Reader: Studies in Mixed Identities and Cultures (London: Routledge, 2010)Google Scholar.

14 Encarnación Gutiérrez Rodríguez and Shirley Anne Tate, Creolizing Europe: Legacies and Transformations (Liverpool, England: Liverpool University Press, 2017); Manuela Boatcă, “Inequalities Unbound: Transnational Processes and The Creolization of Europe,” in Postcoloniality-Decoloniality-Black Critique: Joints and Fissures, eds. Sabine Broeck and Carsten Junker (Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 2014), 211–30; Boatcă, Manuela, “Thinking Europe Otherwise: Lessons from the Caribbean,” Current Sociology 69, no. 3 (2021): 389414 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Therborn, Göran, European Modernity and Beyond: The Trajectory of European Societies, 1945–2000 (London: Sage Publications, 1995), 41 Google Scholar.

16 Mintz, “The Localization of Anthropological Practice,” 120.

17 Mintz, “The Localization of Anthropological Practice,” 124.

18 Parvulescu, Anca and Boatcă, Manuela, Creolizing the Modern: Transylvania across Empires (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2022)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On methodological nationalism, see Amelina, Anna et al., eds., Beyond Methodological Nationalism: Research Methodologies for Cross-Border Studies (New York: Routledge, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 On the concept of inter-imperiality, see Doyle, Laura, Inter-Imperiality: Vying Empires, Gendered Labor, and the Literary Arts of Alliance (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2020)Google Scholar.

20 In Poetics of Relation, Glissant invokes the affinity between native populations in the Caribbean and what he calls “circus people”: “The nomadism practiced by populations that move from one part of the forest to another, by the Arawak communities who navigated from island to island in the Caribbean, by circus people [des gens du Cirque] in their peregrinations from village to village” (12).

21 Szeman, Ioana, “‘Black and White Are One’: Anti-Amalgamation Laws, Roma Slaves, and the Romanian Nation on the Mid-Nineteenth-Century Moldavian Stage,” in Uncle Tom’s Cabins: The Transnational History of America’s Most Mutable Book, eds. Davis, Tracy C. and Mihaylova, Stefka (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2020)Google Scholar.

22 Ananya Jahanara Kabir, “Activating Pondicherry Creole: Conversations on Method,” Third Text Online, forthcoming 2023.

23 Glissant, Poetics of Relation, 34.

24 On the monolingual paradigm, see Yildiz, Yasemin, Beyond the Mother Tongue: The Postmonolingual Condition (New York: Fordham University Press, 2012)Google Scholar.

25 Glissant, Poetics of Relation, 214.

26 Hall, Stuart, “Créolité and the Process of Creolization,” in The Creolization Reader: Studies in Mixed Identities and Cultures, eds. Robin Cohen, and Toninato, Paola (London: Routledge, 2010), 29 Google Scholar.

27 Shih, Shu-mei, “Comparison as Relation,” in Comparison: Theories, Approaches, Uses, eds. Felski, Rita and Friedman, Susan Stanford (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013)Google Scholar.

28 On diffusion, see Moretti, Franco, “Conjectures on World Literature,” New Left Review 1 (2000): 5468 Google Scholar.

29 For a critique of the extension of the term beyond the Caribbean, see Palmié, Stephan, “Creolization and Its Discontents,” Annual Review of Anthropology 35 (2006): 433–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Glissant, Poetics of Relation, 65.

31 Hall, “Créolité and the Process of Creolization,” 29.

32 Lionnet, Françoise and Shih, Shu-mei, eds., The Creolization of Theory (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011)Google Scholar.

33 Boatcă, Manuela, “Unequal Institutions in the Longue Durée: Citizenship through a Southern Lens,” Third World Quarterly 42 no. 9: 19822000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Glissant, Poetics of Relation, 68.