Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

STYLE AND PERSONHOOD: THE CASE OF THE AMASIS PAINTER

  • James Whitley (a1)

Abstract

For archaeologists discussion of style is unavoidable. Within classical archaeology ‘style’ is closely associated with connoisseurship as practised by J. D. Beazley. Style identifies individuals, artistic personalities such as the Amasis Painter. This notion of style necessarily overlaps with another debate within both anthropology and prehistoric archaeology (personhood) which also touches on an older discussion within classical studies. These two debates have remained strangers to each other. The article explores these issues in relation to the iconography of hares and arming scenes. Notions of personhood and agency force us to re-evaluate such iconography and its effectiveness as narrative.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      STYLE AND PERSONHOOD: THE CASE OF THE AMASIS PAINTER
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      STYLE AND PERSONHOOD: THE CASE OF THE AMASIS PAINTER
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      STYLE AND PERSONHOOD: THE CASE OF THE AMASIS PAINTER
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Footnotes

Hide All

This article stems from a talk I gave in Oxford on the 1 May 2017, in a seminar series on ‘style’. I would like to thank Peter Stewart for inviting me, largely it seems on the basis that I once (long ago) produced a book with the word ‘style’ in the title. Peter assured me that not having thought much about style for a very long time was not an impediment to my being there. At the very least I can say that my talk had a cast of very distinguished Oxonians, who have (at various points) commented on either style or personhood. In revising my paper for publication, I have taken advantage of advice from Laurence Totelin (on hares), of the comments of Robin Osborne, Anthony Snodgrass and the two anonymous CCJ referees on earlier drafts, and I am also (as ever) grateful to Kirsty Harding for preparing some fine illustrations.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
ABV = Beazley (1956)
Amyx, D. A. (1988) Corinthian vase painting of the Archaic period, 3 vols., Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Armstrong, J. I. (1958) ‘The arming motif in the Iliad’, AJPh 79, 337–54.
Arrington, N. (2017) ‘Connoisseurship, vases, and Greek art and archaeology’, in. Padgett, J. M. (ed.), The Berlin Painter and his world: Athenian vase painting in the early fifth century BC, New Haven and London, 2139.
Beard, M. (1991) ‘Adopting an approach ii’, in Rasmussen, T. and Spivey, N. (eds.), Looking at Greek vases, Cambridge, 1235.
Beazley, J. D. (1911) ‘The Master of the Berlin amphora’, JHS 31, 276–95.
Beazley, J. D. (1922) ‘Citharoedus’, JHS 42, 7098.
Beazley, J. D. (1932) ‘Little Master cups’, JHS 52, 167204.
Beazley, J. D. (1934) Review of ‘Iliaden i tidlig graesk Kunst’ by K. Friis Johansen, JHS 54, 84–5.
Beazley, J. D. (1956) Athenian black figure vase painters, Oxford. (= ABV)
Beazley, J. D. (1986) The development of Attic black-figure, rev. edn by von Bothmer, D. and Moore, M. B., Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Boardman, J. (1975) Athenian black figure vases, London.
Boardman, J. (1983) ‘Symbol and story in Geometric art’, in Moon, W. G. (ed.), Ancient Greek art and iconography, Madison, 1536.
Boardman, J. (1987) ‘Amasis: the implications of his name’, in True (1987) 141–52.
Bol, P. C. (1989) Argivische Schilde, Olympische Forschungen xvii, Berlin and New York.
Brück, J. (2004) ‘Material metaphors: the relational construction of identity in Early Bronze Age burials in Ireland and Britain’, Journal of Social Archaeology 4, 307–33.
Burgess, J. S. (2009) The death and afterlife of Achilles, Baltimore.
Burkert, W. (1987) ‘The making of Homer in the sixth century BC: rhapsodes versus Stesichoros’, in True (1987) 43–62.
Busby, C. (1997) ‘Permeable and partible persons: a comparative analysis of gender and body in South India and Melanesia’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 3, 261–78.
Carpenter, T. H. (1986) Dionysian imagery in Archaic Greek art: its development in black-figure vase painting, Oxford.
Clarke, D. L. (1978) Analytical archaeology, 2nd edn, London.
Coldstream, J. N. (1968) Greek Geometric pottery: a survey of ten local styles and their chronology, London.
Cook, R. M. (1972) Greek painted pottery, 2nd edn, London.
Coulié, A. (2015) ‘L'atelier du Dipylon: style, typologie et chronologie relative’, in Vlachou (2015a) 37–47.
Descola, P. (2013) Beyond nature and culture, tr. Lloyd, J., Chicago and London.
Dodds, E. R. (1951) The Greeks and the irrational, Sather Classical Lectures 25, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Dunbabin, T. J. and Robertson, M. (1953) ‘Some Protocorinthian vase painters’, ABSA 48, 172–81.
Finkelberg, M. (2012) ‘E.R. Dodds and the irrational: Agamemnon's apology re-visited’, SCI 31, 101–8.
Fowler, C. (2004) The archaeology of personhood: an anthropological approach, London and New York.
Fowler, C. (2016) ‘Relational personhood revisited’, CArchJ 26, 397412.
Friis Johansen, K. (1967) The Iliad in early Greek art, tr. Christensen, L., Copenhagen.
Gell, A. (1998a). Art and agency: an anthropological theory, Oxford.
Gell, A. (1998b) ‘Strathernograms, or the semiotics of mixed metaphors’, in Gell, A., The art of anthropology: essays and diagrams, London, 2975.
Giuliani, L. (2013) Image and myth: a history of pictorial narration in Greek art, tr. O'Donnell, J., Chicago.
Grethlein, J. (2008) ‘Memory and material objects in the Iliad and the Odyssey’, JHS 128, 2751.
Haug, A. (2012) Die Entdeckung des Körpers: Körper- und Rollenbbilder im Athen des 8. und 7. Jahrhunderts v. Chr., Image and Context 10, Berlin and Boston.
Heinrichs, A. (1987) ‘Myth visualized: Dionysos and his circle in sixth-century Attic vase painting’, in True (1987) 92–124.
Hodder, I. (2011) ‘Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17, 154–77.
Hurwit, J. M. (1985) ‘The Dipylon shield once more’, ClAnt 4, 121–6.
Hurwit, J. M. (2002) ‘Reading the Chigi Vase’, Hesperia 71, 122.
Hurwit, J. M. (2015) Artists and signatures in ancient Greece, Cambridge.
Jacobsthal, P. (1944) Early Celtic art, Oxford.
Karouzou, S. (1956) The Amasis Painter, Oxford.
Koehl, R. B. (1986) ‘The chieftain cup and a Minoan rite of passage’, JHS 106, 99110.
Kunze, E. (1950) Archaische Schildbänder, Olympische Forschungen ii, Berlin.
Kurtz, D. (1985) ‘Beazley and the connoisseurship of Greek vases’, in Greek vases in the J. Paul Getty Museum 2, Malibu, CA, 237–50.
Latour, B. (1993) We have never been modern, tr. Porter, C., London and Hemel Hempstead.
Lebessi, A. (1985) Το ιερό του Ερμή και της Αφροδίτης στη Σύμη Βιάννου i: χάλκινα κρητικά τορεύματα, Βιβλιοθήκη της εν Αθήναις Αρχαιολογικής Εταιρείας 102, Athens.
LiPuma, E. (1998) ‘Modernity and forms of personhood in Melanesia’, in Lambek, M. and Strathern, A. (eds.), Bodies and persons: comparative perspectives from Africa and Melanesia, Cambridge, 5379.
Lissarrague, F. (1990) L'autre guerrier: archers, peltastes, cavaliers dans l'imagerie Attique, Images à l'Appui 3, Paris and Rome.
Lowenstam, S. (1993) ‘The arming of Achilleus on early Greek vases’, ClAnt 12, 199218.
Lynch, K. (2017) ‘Reception, intention and Attic vases’, in Nevett, L. C. (ed.), Theoretical approaches to the archaeology of ancient Greece, Ann Arbor, MI, 124–42.
MacIntyre, A. (1985) After virtue: a study in moral theory, 2nd edn, London.
Martin, S. R. (2017). The art of contact: comparative approaches to Greek and Phoenician art, Philadelphia.
Mertens, J. M. (1987) ‘The Amasis Painter: artist and tradition’, in True (1987) 167–83.
Moore, M. B. (1987) ‘The Amasis Painter and Exekias: approaches to narrative’, in True (1987) 153–67.
Morris, C. (1993) ‘Hands up for the individual! The role of attribution studies in Aegean prehistory’, CArchJ 3, 4166.
Nagy, G. (1990) Pindar's Homer: the lyric possession of an epic past, Baltimore and London.
Nagy, G. (1997) ‘The Shield of Achilles: ends of the Iliad and beginnings of the polis’, in Langdon, S., New light on a dark age: exploring the culture of Geometric Greece, Columbia, MO and London, 194207.
Neer, R. (1997) ‘Beazley and the language of connoisseurship’, Hephaistos 15, 730.
Neer, R. (2002) Style and politics in Athenian vase painting: the craft of democracy 530–460 BCE, Cambridge.
Neer, R. (2010) The emergence of the Classical style in Greek sculpture, Chicago and London.
Nevett, L. and Whitley, J. (eds.) (2018) An age of experiment: classical archaeology transformed, McDonald Institute Monographs, Cambridge.
Nottbohm, G. (1943) ‘Der Meister der grossen Dipylon-Amphora in Athen’, JDAI 58, 131.
Oakley, J. (1998) ‘Why study a Greek vase painter? A response to Whitley's “Beazley as theorist”’, Antiquity 72, 209–13.
Oakley, J. (2009) ‘Greek vase painting’, AJA 113, 599627.
Osborne, R. (2018) ‘Homeric imagery’, in Nevett and Whitley (2018) 75–85.
Osborne, R. and Tanner, J. (eds.) (2007) Art's agency and art history, Oxford and Malden, MA.
Padgett, J. M. (ed.) (2017) The Berlin Painter and his world: Athenian vase painting in the early fifth century BC, New Haven and London.
Piggott, S. (1962) The West Kennet Long Barrow: excavations 1955–56, London.
Robertson, M. (1987) ‘The state of Attic vase-painting in the mid-sixth century’, in True (1987) 13–28.
Rouet, P. (2001) Approaches to the study of Greek vases: Beazley and Pottier, Oxford.
Sapirstein, P. (2013) ‘Painters, potters and the scale of the Attic vase-painting industry’, AJA 117, 493510.
Sapirstein, P. (2014) ‘Demographics and productivity in the ancient Athenian pottery industry’, in Oakley, J. H. (ed.), Athenian potters and painters. Volume iii, Oxford and Philadelphia, 175–86.
Saunders, D. (2017) ‘The distribution of the Berlin Painter's vases’, in Padgett (2017) 107–31.
Schnapp, A. (1997) Le chasseur et la cité: chasse et érotique en Grèce ancienne, Paris.
Shanks, M. (1996) Classical archaeology of Greece: experiences of the discipline, London.
Shanks, M. (1999) Art and the Greek city state: an interpretive archaeology, Cambridge.
Shear, T. L. (1937) ‘A Spartan shield from Pylos’, AEph 1937, 140–43.
Snell, B. (1953) The discovery of the mind: the Greek origins of European thought, Oxford.
Snell, B. (1975) Die Entdeckung des Geistes: Studien zur Entstehung des europäischen Denkens bei den Griechen, 5th edn, Göttingen.
Snodgrass, A. M. (1964) Early Greek armour and weapons, Edinburgh.
Snodgrass, A. M. (1980) ‘Towards the interpretation of the Geometric figure scenes’, MDAI(A) 95, 51–8.
Snodgrass, A. M. (1998) Homer and the artists: text and picture in early Greek art, Cambridge.
Snodgrass, A. M. (2006) Archaeology and the emergence of Greece: collected papers on early Greece and related topics, Edinburgh.
Stewart, A. F. (1987) ‘Narrative, genre and realism in the work of the Amasis Painter’, in True (1987) 29–42.
Strathern, M. (1988) The gender of the gift: problems with women and problems with society in Melanesia, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Thomas, N. (1991) Entangled objects: exchange, material culture and colonialism in the Pacific, Cambridge, MA.
True, M. (ed.) (1987) Papers on the Amasis Painter and his world, Malibu, CA.
Vernant, J. P. (1983) Myth and thought among the Greeks, London.
Vernant, J. P. (1989) L'individu, la mort, l'amour: soi-même et l'autre en Grèce ancienne, Paris.
Vlachou, V. (ed.) (2015a) Pots, workshops and Early Iron Age society: function and role of ceramics in early Greece, Brussels.
Vlachou, V. (2015b) ‘From pots to workshops: the Hirschfeld Painter and the Late Geometric i context of Attic pottery production’, in Vlachou (2015a) 49–74.
von Bothmer, D. (1949) ‘The arming of Achilles’, Bulletin of the Museum of Fine Arts (Boston) 47, 8490.
Whitley, J. (1991) Style and society in Dark Age Greece: the changing face of a pre-literate society, Cambridge.
Whitley, J. (1997) ‘Beazley as theorist’, Antiquity 71, 40–7.
Whitley, J. (2006) ‘Classical art and human agency: a tale of two objects in fifth-century Greece’, in Stambolidis, N. C. (ed.), ΓΕΝΕΘΛΙΟΝ: Αναμνηστικός τόμος για την συμπλήρωση είκοσι χρόνων λειτουργίας του Μουσείου Κυκλαδικής Τεχνής, Athens, 227–36.
Whitley, J. (2013) ‘Homer's entangled objects: narrative, agency and personhood in and out of Iron Age texts’, CArchJ 23, 395416.
Whitley, J. (2015) ‘Agency, personhood and the belly-handled amphora: exchange and society in the ninth-century Aegean’, in Vlachou (2015a) 107–26.
Whitley, J. (2018) ‘The krater and the pithos: two kinds of agency’, in Nevett and Whitley (2018) 59–73.
Whitley, J. and Madgwick, R. (2018) ‘Consuming the wild: more thoughts on the andreion’, in Blok, J., van den Eijnde, F. and Strootman, R. (eds.), Feasting and polis institutions, Memnosyne Supplement 414, Leiden, 125–48.
Wilkinson, D. (2013) ‘The emperor's new body: personhood, ontology and the Inka sovereign’, CArchJ 23, 417–32.
Williams, B. (1993) Shame and necessity, Sather Classical Lectures 57, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Williams, D. (1996) ‘Refiguring Attic Red Figure: a review article’, RA 1996 (2), 227–52.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

STYLE AND PERSONHOOD: THE CASE OF THE AMASIS PAINTER

  • James Whitley (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.