Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T06:41:23.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dead Must be Fed: Symbolic Meanings of the Shellmounds of the San Francisco Bay Area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2009

Edward M. Luby  and
Mark F. Gruber
Edward M. Luby
Affiliation:
Phoebe Hearst Museum of Anthropology, 103 Kroeber Hall, and Archaeological Research Facility, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Mark F. Gruber
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology/Anthropology, Saint Vincent College, Latrobe, PA 15650, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Long viewed as ‘kitchen middens’, the shellmounds of the San Francisco Bay Area have -provided archaeologists of coastal California insight into the subsistence and ecology of precontact native groups. In this article, the authors develop a framework for understanding the cultural significance of these shellmounds which regards them as intentional cultural features, incorporates social context, and builds on earlier subsistence-focused studies of the shellmounds in order to better appreciate the meaning of the numerous human remains interred therein. A structural analysis is then used to show that the concepts of food and ancestors joined together at shellmounds, so much so that ritual attention to the ancestors was very likely regarded as essential to ensuring a continuing supply of food.

Type
Articles
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , April 1999 , pp. 95 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aikens, C.M. & Higuchi, T., 1982. The Prehistory of Japan. New York (NY): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Aikens, C.M. & Rhee, S.N. (eds.), 1992. Pacific Northeast Asia in Prehistory. Pullman (WA): Washington State University Press.Google Scholar
Akazawa, T., 1986. Hunter-gatherer adaptations and the transition to food production in Japan, in Hunters in Transition: Mesolithic Societies of Temperate Eurasia and their Transition to Farming, ed. Zvelelbil, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 151–65.Google Scholar
Albrethsen, S.E. & Petersen, E.B., 1976. Excavation of a mesolithic cemetery at Vedbaek, Denmark. Acta Archaeologica 47, 1–28.Google Scholar
Andersen, S., 1991. Bjornsholm, a stratified kokken-modding on the central Limfjord, north Jutland. Journal of Danish Archaeology 10, 59–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, S. & Johansen, E., 1986. Ertebolle revisited. Danish Journal of Archaeology 5, 31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, G., 1975. The role of molluscs in coastal economies: the results of midden analysis in Australia. Journal of Archaeological Sciences 2, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, G., Chappell, J. & Cribb, R., 1994. The origin of Anadara shellmounds at Weipa, North Queensland, Australia. Archaeology in Oceania 29(2), 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, P. & Orlins, R.I., 1979. Final Report of the Testing of Cultural Resources within the Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks Flood Control and Water Resources Project, Contra Costa County, California. San Francisco (CA): U.S. Army Corps of Engineers San Francisco District.Google Scholar
Bean, L.J. & Blackburn, T.C., 1976a. Ceremonial integration and social interaction in aboriginal California, in Bean & Blackburn (eds.), 226–43.Google Scholar
Bean, L.J. & Blackburn, T.C. (eds.), 1976b. Native Califor-nians: a Vteoretical Perspective. Menlo Park (CA): Ballena Press.Google Scholar
Bean, L.J. & King, T. (eds.), 1974. Antap: California Indian Political and Economic Organization. (Anthropological Papers 2.) Menlo Park (CA): Ballena Press.Google Scholar
Bean, L.J. & Lawton, H., 1976. Some explanations for the rise of cultural complexity in Native California with comments on proto-agriculture and agriculture, in Bean & Blackburn (eds.), 19–48.Google Scholar
Beardsley, R.K., 1954. Temporal and areal relationships in central California. University of California Archaeological Survey Reports, 24 and 25.Google Scholar
Bennyhoff, J. & Fredrickson, D., 1994. A proposed integra-tive taxonomic system for central California, in Hughes, (ed.), 15–24.Google Scholar
Bernstein, D.J., 1993. Prehistoric Subsistence on the Southern New England Coast: the Record form Narragansett Bay. New York (NY): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, P., 1976. Toward a Prehistory of the San Francisco Bay area: the Archaeology of Sites Ala-328, Ala-12, & Ala-13. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation in Anthropology, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Bickel, P., 1981. San Francisco Bay archaeology: sites Ala-328, Ala-13 and Ala-12. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 43.Google Scholar
Bocek, B., 1991. Prehistoric settlement pattern and social organization on the San Francisco Peninsula, California, in Between Bands and States, ed. Gregg, S.A.. Carbondale (IL): Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, 58–88.Google Scholar
Brinch Petersen, E., 1989. Late Paleolithic and Mesolithic. Arkaeologiske Udgravningar I Danmark 1986, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Broughton, J., 1994. Declines in mammalian foraging efficiency during the Late Holocene, San Francisco Bay, California. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 13, 371–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broughton, J., 1996. Excavation of the Emeryville shellmound, 1906: Nels Nelson's final report. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 54.Google Scholar
Buchanan, W.F., 1988. Shellfish and Prehistoric Diet: Elands's Bay, S.W. Cape Coast, South Africa. (British Archaeological Reports, International Series, 455.) Oxford: BAR.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartkoff, J.L. & Chartkoff, K.K., 1984. The Archaeology of California. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, J.D.G., 1975. The Earlier Stone Age Settlement of Scandinavia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, J.T., 1960. The archaeology of the Fernandez site, a San Francisco Bay region shellmound. Reports of the University of California Archaeological Survey 49, 11–52.Google Scholar
Erlandson, J.M. & Glassow, M.A. (eds.), 1997. Archaeology of the California Coast During the Middle Holocene. Los Angeles (CA): Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Feinman, G.M. & Price, T.D. (eds.), 1995. Foundations of Social Inequality. New York (NY): Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Ferreira, N.F., 1994. The end of the Paleolithic and the Mesolithic in Portugal. Current Anthropology 35, 664–74.Google Scholar
Firth, R., 1939. Primitive Polynesian Economy. London: George Routledge & Sons.Google Scholar
Follett, W.I., 1975. Fish remains from the West Berkeley shellmound (CA-Ala-307), Alameda County, California, in ‘West Berkeley (CA-Ala-307): a culturally stratified shellmound on the East Shore of San Francisco Bay’, eds. WJ. Wallace & D.W. Lathrap. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 29, 71–98.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, D., 1974. Social change in prehistory: a central California example, in Bean & King (eds.), 57–73.Google Scholar
Gerow, B.A., 1968. An Analysis of the University Village Complex with a Reappraisal of Central California Archaeology. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gifford, E.W., 1916. Composition of California shell-mounds. University of California Publications in Archaeology and Ethnology 12, 1–29.Google Scholar
Goldstein, L., 1976. Spatial Structure and Social Organization: Regional Manifestations if Missippian society. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Harrington, J.P., 1942. Culture element distributions, XIX: central California coast. University of California Anthropological Records 7(1), 1–46.Google Scholar
Hayden, B., 1995. Pathways to power: principles for creating socioeconomic inequalities, in Feinman & Price (eds.), 15–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heizer, R.F., (ed.), 1978. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 8: California. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Henshilwood, C., Nilssen, P. & Parkington, J., 1994. Mussel drying and food storage in the late Holoecene, S.W. Cape, South Africa. Journal of Field Archaeology 21, 103–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertz, R., 1907. Contribution á une étude suf la representation collective de la mort. Année Sociologique 10, 48–137.Google Scholar
Hibbs, J., 1983. Neolithic of Brittany and Normandy, in Scarre, (ed.), 271–323.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.), 1982. Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., 1986. Reading the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. (ed.), 1994. Toward a new taxonomic framework for central California archaeology. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 52, 15–24.Google Scholar
Huntington, R. & Metcalf, P., 1979. Celebrations of Death. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jerardino, A. & Yates, R., 1997. Excavations at Mike Taylor’ midden: a summary report and implications for a recharacterisation of mega-middens. South African Archaeological Bulletin 52, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R., 1968. The geographical background to the arrival of man in Australia and Tasmania. Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania 3, 186–215.Google Scholar
King, T.F., 1970. The Dead at Tiburon. (Northwestern Archaeological Society, Occasional Papers 2.) Santa Rosa (CA): Northwestern Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
King, T.F., 1974. The evolution of status ascription around San Francisco Bay, in Bean & King (eds.), 35–54.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A., 1925. Handbook of the Indians of California. (Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 78.) Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A.L., 1962. The nature of land-holding groups in aboriginal California. University of California Arcliaeo-logical Survey Reports 56.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1962. The Savage Mind. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levy, R., 1978. Costonoan, in Heizer, (ed.), 485–95.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, K.G., 1993. Long-term developments in complex hunter-gatherer societies: recent perspectives from the Pacific Coast of North America. Journal of Archaeological Research 1(3), 167–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, K.G., 1997. Cultural construction of coastal landscapes: a middle Holocene perspective from San Francisco Bay, in Archaeology of the California Coast during the Middle Holocene, eds. Erlandson, J.M. & Glassow, M.A.. Los Angeles (CA): Institute of Archaeology, University of California, 129–42.Google Scholar
Loud, L.L., 1924. The stege mounds at Richmond, California. University of California Publications in Archaeology and Ethnology 17, 355–72.Google Scholar
Lourajidos, H., 1997. Continent of Hunter-gatherers: New Perspectives in Australian Prehistory. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luby, E.M., 1996. Mortuary Theory, San Francisco Bay Area Archaeology, and Hunter-gatherers. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association 95th Meetings, San Francisco, California, December, 1996.Google Scholar
McGeein, D.J. & Mueller, W.C., 1955. A shellmound in Main county, California. American Antiquity 21(1), 357–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, A., 1900. Gravhoje og Gravfund fra Stenalderen i Danmark II. Copenhagen: Fynen og Jyllard.Google Scholar
Madsen, A., Muller, S., Neergard, C., Petersen, J., Rostrup, E., Steenstrup, K. & Winge, H., 1900. Affaldsdynger fra Stenalderen I Danmark. Copenhagen: Undersugte fur Nationalmusset.Google Scholar
Margolin, M., 1978. The Ohlone Way: Indian Life in the San Francisco and Monterey Bay Area. Berkeley (CA): Heydey Books.Google Scholar
Mauss, M., 1954. The Gift (translated by Cunnison, I.). Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meighan, C., 1953. Preliminary excavations of the Thomas site (Mrn-115), Marin County. University of California Archaeological Survey Reports 18, 1–14.Google Scholar
Milliken, R., 1991. An Ethnohistory of the Indian People of the San Francisco Bay area from 1770 to 1810. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation in Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Moratto, M.J., 1984. California Archaeology. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, N., 1909. Shellmounds of the San Francisco Bay region. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 7(4), 309–56.Google Scholar
Nelson, N., 1910. The Ellis Landing shellmound. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 7(5), 357–426.Google Scholar
Ortiz, B., 1994. Chocheno & Rumsen narratives: a comparison, in The Ohlone Past and Present: Native Americans of the San Francisco Bay Region, ed. Bean, L.J.. (Anthropological Papers 42.) Menlo Park (CA): Ballena Press, 49–164.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M., 1982. Mortuary practices, society, and ideology: an ethnoarchaeological study, in Hodder, (ed.), 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkington, J.E., 1991. Approaches to dietary reconstruction in the western Cape: are you what you have eaten? Journal of Archaeological Science 18, 331–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, M., 1993. Statements in Stone: Monuments and Society in Neolithic Brittany. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pequart, M. & Pequart, St-J., 1954. Hoedic: Duexieme Sta-tion-Necropolie du Mesolithique Cotier Armoricain. Anvers: de Sikkel.Google Scholar
Pequart, M., Pequart, St-J., Boule, M. & Vallois, H., 1937. Teviec: Station-Necropolie Mesolithique du Morhihan. (Memoire 18.) Paris: Archives de l'lnstitute de Pal£ontologie Humaine.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1976. Megaliths, territories and populations, in Acculturation and Continuity in Atlantic Europe, ed. de Laet, S.J.. Brugge: De Tempel, 198–220.Google Scholar
Roche, J., 1972. Le Gisement Mesolithique de Morta de Sebastiao, Portugal. 2nd edition. Lisbon: Institute de Alta Cultura.Google Scholar
Scarre, C. (ed.), 1983a. Ancient France: Neolithic Societies and their Landscapes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scarre, C., 1983b. A summary of the French Neolithic, in Scarre (ed.), 324–43.Google Scholar
Shawcross, W., 1967. An investigation of prehistoric diet and economy on a coastal site at Galatea Bay, New Zealand. Proceedings oftlte Prehistoric Society 33, 107–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherrat, A., 1995. Instruments of conversion? The role of megaliths in the Mesolithic/Neolithic transition in northwest Europe. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 14(3), 245–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shetelig, H. & Falk, H., 1937. Scandinavian Archaeology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, D.D., 1992. Prehistoric mammal exploitation in the San Francisco Bay area, in Essays on the Prehistory of Maritime California, ed. Jones, T.L.. (Publication 10.) Davis (CA): Center for Archaeological Research, 73–104.Google Scholar
Stein, J.K., 1992. Deciphering a Shell Midden. San Diego (CA): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stratham, E.T., 1892. Observations of shellheaps and shellbeds. Journal of the Royal Society of New South Wales 26, 304–14.Google Scholar
Sullivan, M.E., 1984. A shellmidden excavation at Pambula Lake on the far south coast of New South Wales. Archaeology in Oceania 19, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, C., 1996. An Ethnography of the Neolithic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uhle, M., 1907. The Emeryville shellmound. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 7(4), 309–356.Google Scholar
Van Gennep, A., 1960. The Rites of Passage. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wiberg, R., 1983. The Santa Rita Village Mortuary Complex: Evidence and Implications of a Meganos Intrusion. Unpublished M.A. thesis in Anthropology, San Francisco State University.Google Scholar