Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Influence of Ethical Leadership and Regulatory Focus on Employee Outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Mitchell J. Neubert
Baylor University
Cindy Wu
Baylor University
James A. Roberts
Baylor University
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]


Regulatory focus theory is proposed as offering an explanation for the influence of ethical leadership on organizational citizenship behaviors and employee commitments. The prevention focus mindset of an employee is argued to be the mechanism by which an ethical leader influences extra-role compliance behavior as well as normative commitment, whereas the promotion focus mindset of an employee is argued to be the mechanism by which an ethical leader influences extra-role voice behavior as well as affective commitment. Moreover, leader-member exchange is proposed as a moderator of the relationship of ethical leadership to regulatory focus mindsets and employee behavior and commitments. Using the data collected in two waves from 250 working adults, we tested the proposed relationships with moderated mediation bootstrap procedures. The findings generally support the hypothesized relationships and point toward important implications for ethical leadership in work settings.

Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2013


Allen, N.J., & Meyer, J.P. 1990. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63: 118. Scholar
Arvey, R.D., & Jones, A.P. 1985. The use of discipline in organizational settings: A framework for future research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 67: 367408.Google Scholar
Avolio, B.J., & Bass, B.M. 1988. Transformational leadership, charisma, and beyond. In Hunt, J.G., Baliga, B.R., Dachler, H.P., & Schriesheim, C.A. (Eds.), Emerging leadership vistas: 2949. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. 1991. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50: 248–87. Scholar
Bass, B.M., & Steidlmeier, P. 1999. Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10: 181218. Scholar
Bollen, K.A., & Stine, R. 1990. Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Sociological Methodology, 20: 115–40. Scholar
Borman, W.C., & Motowidlo, S.J. 1993. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In Schmitt, N., & Borman, W.C. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations: 7198. LSan Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Brockner, J., & Higgins, E.T. 2001. Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 86(1): 3566. Scholar
Brown, M.E., & Mitchell, M.S. 2010. Ethical and unethical leadership: Exploring new avenues for future research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(4): 583616. Scholar
Brown, M.E., & Treviño, L.K. 2006. Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17: 595616. Scholar
Brown, M.E., Treviño, L.K., & Harrison, D.A. 2005. Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97: 117–34. Scholar
Cameron, K. 2006. Good or not bad: Standards and ethics in managing change. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3): 317–23. Scholar
Caza, A., Barker, B.A., & Cameron, K.S. 2004. Ethics and ethos: The buffering and amplifying effects of ethical behavior and virtuousness. Journal of Business Ethics, 52: 169–78. Scholar
Choi, J.M. 2007. Change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: Effects of work environment characteristics and intervening psychological processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28: 467–84. Scholar
Ciulla, J.B. 1995. Leadership ethics: Mapping the territory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5: 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. 2003. Multiple commitments in the workplace: An integrative approach Mah-wah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cooper-Hakim, A., & Viswesvaran, C. 2005. The construct of work commitment: Testing an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2): 241–59. ScholarPubMed
Dansereau, F., Graen, G.B., & Haga, W. 1975. A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership in formal organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13: 46–78. Scholar
De Hoogh, A.H.B., & Den Hartog, D.N. 2008. Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates’ optimism: A multi-method study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19: 297311. Scholar
Detert, J., Treviño, L.K., Burris, E., & Andiappan, M. 2007. Managerial models of influence and counterproductivity in organizations: A longitudinal business unit-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 9931005. Scholar
Dierdorff, E.C., & Morgenson, F.P. 2007. Consensus in work role requirements: The influence of discrete occupational context on role expectations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5): 1228–41. ScholarPubMed
Edwards, J.R., & Lambert, L.S. 2007. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1): 122. ScholarPubMed
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18: 3950. Scholar
Friedman, R.S., & Förster, J. 2001. The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81(6): 1001–13. ScholarPubMed
Gao, L., Janssen, O., & Shi, K. 2011. Leader trust and employee voice: The moderating role of empowering leader behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(4): 787–98. Scholar
Gerstner, C.R., & Day, D.V. 1997. Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 827–44. Scholar
Ghoshal, S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4: 79–91. Scholar
Giampetro-Meyer, A., Brown, T., Browne, M.N., & Kubasek, N. 1998. Do we really want more leaders in business? Journal of Business EthicsJournal of Business EthicsJournal of Business EthicsJournal of Business Ethics, 17: 1727–36. Scholar
Graen, G.B., & Scandura, T.A. 1987. Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9: 175208.Google Scholar
Graen, G.B., & Uhl-Bien, M. 1995. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 25: 219–47. Scholar
Higgins, E.T. 1997. Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12): 12801300. ScholarPubMed
Higgins, E.T. 1998. Promotion and prevention regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30: 141. Scholar
Higgins, E.T. 2000. Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55: 1217–30. ScholarPubMed
Higgins, E.T., Roney, C.J.R., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. 1994. Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(2): 276–86. ScholarPubMed
Higgins, E.T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R.S. 1997. Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3): 515–25. ScholarPubMed
Higgins, E.T., & Silberman, I. 1998. Development of regulatory focus: Promotion and prevention as ways of living. In Heckhausen, J., & Dweck, C.S. (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulation across the lifespan. New York: Cambridge University Press. Scholar
Higgins, E.T., & Tykocinski, O. 1992. Self-discrepancies and biographical memory: Personality and cognition at the level of psychological situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(5): 527–35. Scholar
Hooper, D.T., & Martin, R. 2008. Beyond personal leader-member exchange (LMX) quality: The effects of perceived LMX variability on employee reactions. The Leadership Quarterly, 19: 2030. Scholar
Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J.D., & Morgeson, F.P. 2007. Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 269–77. Scholar
James, L., James, L., & Ashe, D. 1990. The meaning of organizations: The role of cognition and values. In Schneider, B. (Eds.), Organizational climate and culture:4084). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Johnson, R.E., Chang, C., & Yang, L. 2010. Commitment and motivation at work: The relevance of employee identity and regulatory focus. Academy of Management Review, 35(2): 226–45. Scholar
Judge, T.A., Ilies, R., & Scott, B.A. 2006. Work-family conflict and emotions: Effects at work and at home. Personnel Psychology, 59(4): 779814. Scholar
Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D.N., De Hoogh, A.H.B. 2011. Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1): 5169. Scholar
Kark, R., & Van Dijk, D. 2007. Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: The role of the self regulatory focus in leadership processes. Academy of Management Review, 32: 500–28. Scholar
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Bolger, N. 1998. Data analysis in social psychology. In Gilbert, D.T., Fiske, S.T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, 4th ed.:233–65). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kerr, S., & Jermier, J.M. 1978. Substitutes for leadership: their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22: 375403. Scholar
Klein, H.J., Molloy, J.C., & Cooper, J.T. 2009. Conceptual foundations: Construct definitions and theoretical representations of workplace commitments. In Klein, H.J., Becker, T.E., & Meyer, J.P. (Eds.), Commitment in organizations: Accumulated wisdom and new directions. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lanaj, K., Chang, C., & Johnson, R.E. 2012. Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5): 9981034. ScholarPubMed
LePine, J.A., & Van Dyne, L. 2001. Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with Big Five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2): 326–36. ScholarPubMed
Liberman, N., Idson, L.C., Camacho, C.J., & Higgins, E.T. 1999. Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 77(6): 1135–45. ScholarPubMed
Marinova, S., Moon, H., & Van Dyne, L. 2010. Are all good soldier behaviors the same? Supporting multidimensionality of organizational citizenship behaviors based on rewards and roles. Human Relations, 60(10): 1463–85. Scholar
Mayer, D.M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R.L., & Kuenzi, M. 2012. Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1): 151–71. Scholar
Mayer, D.M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. 2009. How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108: 113. Scholar
Meyer, J.P. 2009. Commitment in a changing world of work. In Klein, H.J., Becker, T.E., & Meyer, J.P. (Eds.), Commitment in organizations: Accumulated wisdom and new directions. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Meyer, J.P., & Allen, R. 1991. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1: 61–89. Scholar
Meyer, J.P., & Allen, R. 1997. Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Meyer, J.P., Becker, T.E., & Vandeberghe, C. 2004. Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6): 9911007. Scholar
Morrison, E.W. 2011. Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1): 373412. Scholar
Neubert, M.J., Carlson, D.S., Kacmar, K.M., Roberts, J.A. & Chonko, L.B. 2009. The virtuous influence of ethical leadership behavior: Evidence from the field. Journal of Business Ethics, 90: 157–70. Scholar
Neubert, M.J., Kacmar, K.M., Carlson, D.S., Chonko, L.B. & Roberts, J.A. 2008. Regulatory focus as a mediator of the influence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6): 1220–33. ScholarPubMed
Organ, D.W., & Konovsky, M. 1989. Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 7: 157–64. Scholar
Piccolo, R.F., & Colquitt, J.A. 2006. Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 327–40. Scholar
Piccolo, R.F., Greenbaum, R., Hartog, D.N., & Folger, R. 2010. The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31: 259–78. Scholar
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 879903. ScholarPubMed
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Paine, J.B., & Bachrach, D.G. 2000. Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3): 513–63. Scholar
Rubin, R.S., Dierdorff, E.C., & Brown, M.E. 2010. Do ethical leaders get ahead? Exploring ethical leadership and promotability. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2): 215–36. Scholar
Salancik, G. 1977. Commitment is too easy! Organizational Dynamics, 6: 62–80. Scholar
Scandura, T.A., Graen, G.B., & Novak, M.A. 1986. When managers decide not to decide autocratically: Leader-member exchange and decision influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 250–56. Scholar
Scholer, A.A., & Higgins, E.T. 2010. Regulatory focus in a demanding world. In Hoyle, R.H. (Eds.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation: 291291. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C.A., Organ, D.W., & Near, J.P. 1983. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68: 653–63. Scholar
Sobel, M.E. 1982. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In Leinhardt, S. (Eds.), Sociological methodology 1982: 290312. Washington, D.C.: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
Sparrowe, R.T., Soetjipto, B.W., & Kraimer, M.L. 2006. Do leaders’ influence tactics relate to members’ helping behavior? It depends on the quality of the relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6): 11941208. Scholar
Tenbrunsel, A.E., Smith-Crowe, K., & Umphress, E. 2003. Building houses on rocks: The role of the ethical infrastructure on organizations. Social Justice Research, 16: 285307. Scholar
Thompson, J.A., & Bunderson, J.S. 2003. Violations of principle: Ideological currency in the psychological contract. Academy of Management Review, 28: 571–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L.K. 1992. The social effects of punishments in organizations: A justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 17: 647–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L.K., Brown, M., & Hartmann, L.P. 2003. A qualitative investigation of perceived executive leadership in organizations: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 55: 5–37. Scholar
Treviño, L.K., Hartman, L.P., & Brown, M. 2000. Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42(4): 128–42. Scholar
Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J.A. 1998. Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1): 108–19. Scholar
Wallace, C., and Chen, G. 2006. A multilevel integration of personality, climate, self-regulation, and performance. Personnel Psychology, 59(3): 529–57. Scholar
Walumbwa, F.O., Avolio, B.J., Gardner, W.L., Wernsing, T.S., & Peterson, S.J. 2008. Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34: 89126. Scholar
Walumbwa, F.O., Mayer, D.M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., & Christensen, A.L. 2011. Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader-member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115: 204–13. Scholar
Walumbwa, F.O., & Schaubroeck, J. 2009. Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 1275–86. ScholarPubMed
Wayne, S.J., Coyle-Shapiro, J.M., Eisenberger, R., Liden, R.C., Rousseau, D.M., & Shore, L.M. 2009. Social Influences. In Klein, H.J., Becker, T.E., & Meyer, J.P. (Eds.), Commitment in organizations: Accumulated wisdom and new directions. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Weaver, G.R., Treviño, L.K., & Cochran, P.L. 1999. Corporate ethics programs as control systems: Influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 41–57. Scholar
Williams, L.J., & Anderson, S.E. 1991. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17: 601–17. Scholar
Williams, L.J., Cote, J.A., & Buckley, M.R. 1989. Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions of work: Reality or artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 462–68. Scholar
Wiltermuth, S.S., Monin, B., & Chow, R.M. 2010. The orthogonality of praise and condemnation in moral judgment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(4): 302–10. Scholar
Wood, R., & Bandura, A. 1989. Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14: 361–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C., McMullen, J., Neubert, M.J. & Yi, X. 2008. The influence of leader regulatory focus on employee creativity. Journal of Business Venturing, 23: 587602. Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 1961 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-898fc554b-t2lmn Total loading time: 0.48 Render date: 2021-01-26T13:04:02.844Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "1", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Influence of Ethical Leadership and Regulatory Focus on Employee Outcomes
Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The Influence of Ethical Leadership and Regulatory Focus on Employee Outcomes
Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The Influence of Ethical Leadership and Regulatory Focus on Employee Outcomes
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *