Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:57:17.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does Lottery Advertising Exploit Disadvantaged and Vulnerable Markets?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Abstract:

Is it unethical to advertise lotteries? Many citizens think that states should not be actively promoting and encouraging the public to spend hard-earned dollars on a bet that they are virtually guaranteed to lose. Perhaps more importantly, business ethicists are concerned that lottery advertising may be targeting the most vulnerable markets: households with the lowest income and education levels. If this were true, then it would increase the already disproportionately large burden of lottery taxes on the poor. Fortunately, our research finds no evidence to support the contention that advertising is responsible for high rates of lottery participation and expenditures by lower income groups or that low-income groups are more affected by advertising than high-income groups. On the contrary, awareness of lottery advertising seems to be associated with a higher probability to play Lotto only for the middle income group. This means that lottery advertising may actually reduce the regressivity of lottery taxes.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borg, Mary O., and Mason, Paul M.. 1988. “The Budgetary Incidence of a Lottery to Support Education.” National Tax Journal 61 (March): 7585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, Mary O., Mason, Paul M., and Shapiro, Stephen L.. 1991. The Economic Consequences of State Lotteries. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Brinner, Roger E., and Clotfelter, Charles T.. 1975. “An Economic Appraisal of State Lotteries.” National Tax Journal 28 (December): 395404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clotfelter, Charles T. 1979. “On the Regressivity of State Operated ‘Numbers’ Games.” National Tax Journal 32 (December): 54348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clotfelter, Charles T., and Cook, Philip J.. 1987. “Implicit Taxation in Lottery Finance.” National Tax Journal 40 (December): 53346.Google Scholar
Clotfelter, Charles T., and Cook, Philip J. 1989. Selling Hope: State Lotteries in America. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clotfelter, Charles T., Cook, Philip J., Edell, Julie A., and Moore, Marian. 1999. “State Lotteries at the Turn of the Century: Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission” (April 23). Available at http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/ngisc/reports/lotfinal.pdf.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton, and Savage, L. J.. 1948. “The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk.” Journal of Political Economy (August): 279304.Google Scholar
Greene, William. 2000. Econometric Analysis. New York: Macmillian Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Heavey, Jerome F. 1978. “The Incidence of State Lottery Taxes.” Public Finance Quarterly 6 (October): 141526.Google Scholar
Herring, Mary, and Bledsoe, Timothy. 1994. “A Model of Lottery Participation: Demographics, Context, and Attitudes.” Policy Studies Journal 22(2) (Summer): 24558.Google Scholar
Kitchen, Harry, and Powells, Scott. 1991. “Lottery Expenditures in Canada: A Regional Analysis of Determinants and Incidence.” Applied Economics 23: 184552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koza, John R. 1982. “The Myth of the Poor Buying Lottery Tickets.” Public Gaming (January): 3140.Google Scholar
Landman, Janet, and Petty, Ross. 2000. “‘It Could Have Been You’: How States Exploit Counter-factual Thought to Market Lotteries.” Psychology and Marketing 17 (April): 299321.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livernois, John R. 1987. “The Redistributive Effect of Lotteries: Evidence from Canada.” Public Finance Quarterly 15 (July): 33951.Google Scholar
Mikesell, John L. 1989. “A Note on the Changing Incidence of State Lottery Finance.” Social Science Quarterly 70(2) (June): 51320.Google Scholar
Miyazaki, Anthony D., Langenderfer, Jeff, and Sprott, David E.. 1996. “Methodological Issues in Public Policy Research: The Case of Education and Lottery Purchase Behavior.” Marketing and Public Policy Conference Proceedings 6: 18189.Google Scholar
National Gambling Impact Study Commission Final Report. 1999. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Pirog-Good, Maureen, and Mikesell, John L.. 1995. “Longitudinal Evidence of the Changing Socio-Economic Profile of a State Lottery Market.” Policy Studies Journal 23(3) (Fall): 45166.Google Scholar
Scott, Frank, and Garen, John. 1994. “Probability of Purchase, Amount of Purchase, and the Demographic Incidence of the Lottery Tax.” Journal of Public Economics 54: 12143.Google Scholar
Shenk, Joshua Wolf. 1995. “Everyone’s a Loser: How Lottery Ads Entice the Wrong People to Gamble.” Washington Monthly 27(7): 2224.Google Scholar
Spiro, Michael H. 1974. “On the Incidence of the Pennsylvania Lottery.” National Tax Journal 27 (March): 5761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stranahan, Harriet A., and Borg, Mary O.. 1998a. “Horizontal Equity Implications of the Lottery Tax.” National Tax Journal 51(1): 7182.Google Scholar
Stranahan, Harriet A., and Borg, Mary O.. 1998b. “Separating the Decisions of Lottery Expenditures and Participation: A Truncated Tobit Approach.” Public Finance Review 26(2): 99117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suits, Daniel B. 1977. “Gambling Taxes: Regressivity and Revenue Potential.” National Tax Journal 30 (March): 1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Senate. 1985. State Lotteries: An Overview. Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Relations of Committee on Governmental Affairs, 98th Congress, 2nd Session. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, Francois, and Grignon, Julie. 1988. “Canadian Lotteries as Taxes: Revenues and Incidence.” Canadian Tax Journal 36 (March–April): 36988.Google Scholar
Vickrey, William. 1945. “Measuring Utility by Reactions to Risk.” Econometrica 13: 31933.Google Scholar