Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Engaging the evolution of varieties of capitalism: a two-tier approach to examining institutional change

  • Michele Mastroeni

Abstract

There is a continuing need for an analytical approach to institutional change, especially as applied to incremental, agent-driven change. Important institutional change can be incremental and not necessarily linked to immediate crisis. Institutional adjustments initiated by actors in the course of meeting specific economic and political goals can unblock systemic bottlenecks leading to improved economic performance. Aggregate incremental change could also lead to system evolution that deviates significantly from the original system model. This paper presents an approach that engages agent impact on the institutional system, and the political or social motives for action; the two-tiered approach moves away from the categories described in Varieties of Capitalism, one of the more influential approaches to analyzing institutional impact in an economy. Instead of static national categories, the approach presented in this paper differentiates between defining institutions and instrumental institutions, the differences in ease and speed of change which characterize each institutional tier, and how the system's evolution is impacted by the combined effect of changes in each tier. Differentiating between institutions in this manner, the paper provides an approach that is more flexible in explaining the interactions between agents and institutions, and the changes which may result.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Innogen Institute, University of Edinburgh, Old Surgeon's Hall High School Yards Edinburgh Midlothian EH1 1LZ, UK, Tel.: +441316506391, E-mail: m.mastroeni@ed.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Ahlquist, J. and Breunig, C. 2012. “Model-based clustering and typologies in the social sciences.” Political Analysis 20: 92112.
Akkermans, D. C. Castaldi and Los, B. 2005. “Do Liberal market economies really innovate more radically than coordinated market economies? Hall and soskice reconsidered,” Paper presented at the EMAEE.
Amable, B. and Palombarini, S. 2009. “A neorealist approach to institutional change and the diversity of capitalism.” Socio-Economic Review 7: 123143.
Barry, F. and Bradley, J. 1997. “FDI and Trade: the Irish host-country experience.” Economic Journal 107: 17981811.
Black, B. and Gilson, R. 2003. “Venture capital and the structure of capital markets: banks versus stock markets.” In: McCahery, J.A. and Renneboog, L.D.R. (eds.), Venture capital contracting and the valuation of high-technology firms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blyth, M. 2003. “Same as it never was: temporality and typology in the Varieties of capitalism.” Comparative European Politics 1: 215225.
Campbell, J. and Pedersen, O. 2007. “The varieties of capitalism and hybrid success: Denmark in the global economy.” Comparative Political Studies 40: 307332.
Casper, S. and Whitley, R. 2004. “Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms: a comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK.” Research Policy 33: 89106.
Cetindamar, D. and Jacobsson, S. 2003. “The Swedish venture capital industry: an infant, adolescent or grown-up?” In: Cetindamar, D. (ed.), The growth of venture capital: a cross-cultural comparison. London: Praeger, pp. 119148.
Cogan, D. and McDevitt, J. 2000. Science, technology and innovation policy & science and technology policy evaluation: the Irish experience. Dublin: Converge Workshop.
Cortell, A. and Peterson, S. 1999. “Altered states: explaining domestic institutional change.” British Journal of Political Science 29: 177203.
Deeg, R. and Jackson, G. 2007. “Towards a more dynamic theory of capitalist variety.” Socio-Economic Review 5: 149179.
Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment. 2006. Strategy for science, technology and innovation, 2006–2013. Dublin.
Ireland, Enterprise. 1999. Seed and venture capital measure of the operational programme, 1994–1999 report. Dublin.
Evans, P. 1995. Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fitzpatrick, J. 2001. Discussion paper from Ireland on building sustainable competitive advantage in Irish industry, peer review. Dublin: Mutual Learning Programme.
Gertler, M. 2010. “Rules of the game: the place of institutions in regional economic change.” Regional Studies 44: 115.
Giarratana, M., Pagano, A. and Torris, S. 2005. “The role of multinational companies.” In: Arora, A. and Gambardella, A. (eds.), From underdogs to tigers: the rise and growth of the software industry in Brazil, China, India, Ireland and Israel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 207235.
Girvin, B. 1989. Between two worlds: politics and economy in independent Ireland. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.
Hall, P. 2007. “The evolution of varieties of capitalism in Europe.” In: Hancké, B., Rhodes, M. and Thatcher, M. (eds.), Beyond varieties of capitalism: conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3988.
Hall, P. and Soskice, D. 2001. Varieties of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Publishers.
Hall, P. and Gingerich, D. 2009. “Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the political economy: an empirical analysis.” British Journal of Political Studies 39: 449482.
Hall, P. and Thelen, K. 2009. “Institutional change in varieties of capitalism.” Socio-Economic Review 7: 734.
Henrekson, M. and Rosenberg, N. 2001. “Designing efficient institutions for science-based entrepreneurship: lessons from the US and Sweden.” Journal of Technology Transfer 26: 207231.
Henrekson, M. and Jakobsson, U. 2003. “The Swedish model of corporate ownership and control in transition.” In: Huizinga, H. and Jonung, L. (eds.), Who will own Europe? The internationalisation of asset ownership in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 207246.
Herrigel, G. and Zeitlin, J. 2010. “Alternatives to varieties of capitalism.” Business History Review 84: 667674.
Hilliard, R. and Green, R. 2005. “Innovation policy governance and institutional change in Ireland.” Paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference, Copenhagen.
Immergut, E. 1998. “The theoretical core of the new instititutionalism.” Politics & Society 26 (1): 534.
Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M. and Hellsmark, H. 2003. “Entrepreneurial transformation in the Swedish university system: the case of Chalmers University of Technology.” Research Policy 32 (9): 15551568.
Jasso, G. and Opp, K.-D. 1997. “Probing the character of norms: a factorial survey analysis of the norms of political action.” American Sociological Review 62: 947964.
Lehrer, M. and Asakawa, K. 2004. “Rethinking the public sector: idiosyncracies of biotechnology commercialisation as motors of national R&D reform in Germany and Japan.” Research Policy 33: 921938.
Mac Sharry, R. 2000. “Social partnership.” In: Mac Sharry, R., White, P. and O'Malley, J. (eds.), The making of the celtic tiger: the inside story of Ireland's boom economy. Cork: Mercier Press, Chapter 5.
Mastroeni, M. and Rosiello, A. 2010. “Life science innovation strategies, in Sweden, Ireland and Ontario: lessons learned for Scotland.” Commissioned report for Scottish Enterprise.
McGowan, P. 1990. Money and banking in Ireland. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
Nilsson, A., von Borgstede, C. and Biel, A. 2004. “Willingness to accept climate change strategies: the effect of values and norms.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 24: 267277.
Niosi, J. 2002. “National systems of innovation are “x-efficient” (and x-effective): why some are slow learners.” Research Policy 31: 291302.
Niosi, J. and Bellon, B. 2002. “The absorptive capacity of regions,” Paper presented at the Colloque economie mediterranee Monde Arabe.
North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O'Connor, T. 2001. “Foreign direct investment and indigenous industry in Ireland: review of evidence, one Europe or several?” Working Papers.
OECD, 1996. “The knowledge-based economy, OCDE/GD(96)102.” In: Science, Technology and Industry Outlook. Paris: OECD Publishing.
O'Riain, S. 2004. The politics of high-tech growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rafiqui, P. 2010. “Varieties of capitalism and local outcomes: A Swedish case study.” European Urban and Regional Studies 17 (3): 309329.
Reiter, J. 2003. “Changing the microfoundations of corporatism: the impact of financial globalization on Swedish corporate ownership.” New Political Economy 8: 103125.
Roland, G. 2004. “Understanding institutional change: fast-moving and slow-moving institutions.” Studies in International Comparative Development 38: 109131.
Schneider, M. and Paunescu, M. 2012. “Changing varieties of capitalism and revealed comparative advantages from 1990 to 2005: a test of the Hall and Soskice claims.” Socio-Economic Review 10: 731753.
Steinmo, S. 2003. “Bucking the trend? The welfare state and global economy: the Swedish case up close.” New Political Economy 8: 3148.
Taylor, M. 2004. “Empirical evidence against varieties of capitalism's theory of technological innovation.” International Organization 58: 601631.
Tylecote, A. 1994. “Financial systems and Innovation.” In: Dodgson, M. and Rothwell, R. (eds.), Handbook of industrial innovation. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, Chapter 19.
Van Deth, J. 2003. “Measuring social capital: orthodoxies and continuing controversies.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 6: 7992.
Varheim, A. 2003. “Changing varieties of capitalism: Irish corporatism and innovation policy 1987–2000.” Paper presented at the second general conference of the European consortium for political research. Marburg, Germany.
Zysman, J. 1994. “Dynamic diversity: institutions and economic development in advanced countries.” In: Delorme, R. and Dopfer, K. (eds.), The political economy of diversity. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 126146.
Zysman, J. 1986. “Financial systems and innovation.” Conference paper presented on innovation diffusion, Venice, March 17–22.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business and Politics
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1469-3569
  • URL: /core/journals/business-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed