Skip to main content Accessibility help

Verb agreement in Proto-Tibeto-Burman

  • Scott DeLancey


My purpose in this paper is to outline a preliminary reconstruction scheme for the agreement morphology of the Proto-Tibeto-Burman (PTB) verb. I will deal with two separable issues: the provenence of the widespread suffixal agreement paradigm, and that of a less widely attested set of prefixes. The suffixal paradigm has, since the work of Bauman (1974, 1975, 1979, see also DeLancey 1980, 1981b) been recognized by some, but by no means all, Tibeto- Burmanists as being reconstructible for PTB. The prefixes, on the other hand, are as far as I know currently universally viewed as of secondary origin (although Bauman (1975) attributes a PTB provenence to one of the morphemes involved, he does not consider it to have been part of an original agreement system). I will show, however, that there is good evidence on which to base an argument that these also are of PTB provenence, and in fact very likely older than the suffixes.



Hide All
Allen, N. J. 1975. Sketch of Thulung grammar. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University China-Japan Program.
Anon, . 1959. Qingpo yu yufa gangyao. Beijing.
Barnard, J. T. O. 1934. A handbook of the Rawang dialect of the Nung language. Rangoon.
Bauman, James. 1974. ‘Pronominal verb morphology in Tibeto-Burman’, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 1, I: 108–55.
Bauman, James. 1975. Pronouns and pronominal morphology in Tibeto-Burman. Ph.D. dissertation,University of California, Berkeley.
Bauman, James. 1979. ‘An historical perspective on ergativity in Tibeto-Burman’, in F., Plank (ed.) Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations. London: Academic Press.
Benedict, Paul, K. 1972. Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Caughley, Ross. 1982. The syntax and morphology of the verb in Chepang. (Pacific Linguistics Series B, no. 84.) Canberra: Australian National University.
Das Gupta, Kamalesh. 1971. An introduction to the Node language. Shillong: N.E.F.A.
Das Gupta, Kamalesh. 1977. A phrase book in Miju. Shillong.
Das Gupta, Kamalesh. 1978. ‘A note on the Tangsa dialect’, RESARUN, III, 3: 15.
DeLancey, Scott. 1980a. Deictic categories in the Tibeto-Burman verb. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
DeLancey, Scott. 1980b. ‘Parameters of empathy’, Journal of Linguistic Research, 1, 3:41–9.
DeLancey, Scott, 1981a. ‘An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns’, Language, 57:626–57.
DeLancey, Scott. 1981b. ‘The category of direction in Tibeto-Burman’, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 6, 1: 83101.
DeLancey, Scott. 1983. ‘Tangut and Tibeto-Burman morphology’, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 7, 2: 100–8.
DeLancey, Scott. 1985. ‘Lhasa Tibetan evidentials and the semantics of causation’, in M., Niepokuj et al. (ed.) Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 6572.
DeLancey, Scott. 1987. ‘Sino-Tibetan languages’, in B., Comrie (ed.) The world's major languages. London: Croom Helm: 797810.
Delancey, Scott. (Forthcoming.) ‘On the evolution of the Kham agreement paradigm’, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area.
DeLancey, Scott, Lon, Diehl, and LaRaw, Maran. 1978. ‘A localistic account of aspect in Jinghpaw’, University of Michigan Papers in Linguistics, 2, 4: 4964.
Driem, George van. 1987. A grammar of Limbu. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Driem, George van (Forthcoming.) ‘The verbal morphology of Dumi Rai simplicia’, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area.
Driem, George van. 1988. ‘The verbal morphology of Dumi Rai simplicia’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 11, 1: 134207.
Ebert, Karen. 1987. ‘Grammatical marking of speech act participants in Tibeto-Burman’, Journal of Pragmatics, 11: 473–82.
Genetti, Carol. (Forthcoming.) ‘A contrastive study of the Dolakhali and Katmandu Newari dialects’, Cahiers de Linguistique, Asie Orientate.
Genetti, Carol. 1987. ‘ A contrastive study of the Dolakhali and Kathmandu Newari dialects’, presented at the 20th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics.
Hale, Austin. 1980. ‘Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari’, in R., Trail (ed.), Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics no. 7 (Pacific Linguistics Series A, No. 53), Canberra, Australian National University: 95106.
Henderson, E. J. A. 1957. ‘Colloquial Chin as a pronominalized language’, BSOAS, xx, 2: 323–7.
Henderson, E. J. A. 1965. Tiddim Chin: A descriptive analysis of two texts. London: Oxford University Press.
Lo, Ch'ang-p'ei. 1945. ‘A preliminary study on the Trung language of Kung Shan’, HJAS, 8:343–8.
Nagano, Yasuhiko. 1984. A historical study of the rGyarong verb system. Tokyo: Seishido.
Shafer, Robert. 1966. Introduction to Sino-Tibetan. Part I. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Stern, Theodore. 1963. ‘A provisional sketch of Sizang (Siyin) Chin’, Asia Major, n.s., x, 2: 2278.
Stern, Theodore. 1984. ‘Sizang (Siyin) Chin texts’, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 8, 1:4358.
Sun, Hongkai. 1983. ‘Wo-guo Zang-Mian-yu dungci-de rencheng fanchou’, Minzu Yuwen, 2:1729.
Sun, Hongkai, etal. 1980. Menba, Loba, Dengren-de yuyan, Beijing.
Thurgood, Graham. 1984. ‘The “Rung” languages: A major new Tibeto-Burman subgroup’, in C., Brugman, et al. (ed.), Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 338–49.
Thurgood, Graham. 1985. ‘Pronouns, agreement systems, and the subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman’, in G., Thurgood et al. (ed.), Linguistics of the Sino-Tibetan area: the state of the art (Pacific Linguistics Series C, no. 87). Canberra: Australian National University: 376400.
Voegelin, C. F., and Voegelin, F. M.. 1977. Classification of the world's languages. New York: Elsevier/North Holland.
Weidert, Alfons. 1985. ‘Paradigmatic typology and its application to verb agreement analysis’, in Pieper, & Stickel, (ed.), Studia Linguistica Diachronica et Synchronica, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 903936.
Weidert, Alfons, and Subba, B.. 1985. Concise Limbu grammar and dictionary. Amsterdam: Lobster Publications.
Wen, Yu. 1944. ‘Lun Jiarong yu dungcu-zhi rencheng weicu’, Bulletin of Chinese Studies, 4, 2: 7994.

Verb agreement in Proto-Tibeto-Burman

  • Scott DeLancey


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed