Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:51:17.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The semantic structure of nominal compounds in modern Hebrew

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Raphael Nir
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The term ‘derivation’ denotes a process of linguistic creativity. It does not involve creating something out of nothing, rather of availing oneself of material already existing in the language in order to create new lexemes (i.e. new ‘lexical words’). Clearly, the lexicon is not enriched through derivation only; generally speaking, derivation is not involved when a word is borrowed from outside, i.e. from another language. The borrowed word enters the Hebrew lexicon as a moneme, so there is no creativity (or very little of it) involved in the borrowing process.

Type
Articles Notes and Communications
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , June 1980 , pp. 185 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aronson-Berman, R. 1978. Modern Hebrew structure. Tel-Aviv: University Publishing Projects.Google Scholar
Bally, Ch. 1965. Linguistique générale et linguistique française. (4ème éd.) Bern: Ernest Leroux.Google Scholar
Ben-Hayyim, Z. 1971. ‘Hebrew grammar—morphology’, Encyclopaedia Judaica, VIII, 102–24.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. 1975. Aspects of Language. (Second ed.) New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, esp. 107–23.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. 1970. Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Corbin, D. 1976. ‘Le statut des exceptions dans le lexique’, Langue Français (Paris), XXX, 90–110.Google Scholar
Dokulil, M. 1966. ‘Zum wechselseitigen Verhältnis zwischen Wortbildung und Syntax’, Travaux Linguistiques de Prague, 1. (L'École de Prague d'aujourd'hui, Academia, Prague), 215–24.Google Scholar
Gauger, H. M. 1971. Durchsichtige Wörter: zur Theorie der Wortbildung. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Halle, M. 1973. ‘Prolegomena to a theory of word formation’, Linguistic Inquiry, IV, 1, 3–16.Google Scholar
Kaddari, M. 1969. ‘zihuy yexidot semantiyot murkavot be'ivrit’, in Proceedings of the Fourth World Congress of Judaism, vol. II. Jerusalem, 135–43.Google Scholar
Kooij, J. G. 1968. ‘Compounds and idioms’, Lingua, XXI, 250–68.Google Scholar
Koziol, H. 1937. Handbuch der englischer Wortbildungslehre. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. 1968. Language and its structure. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Leech, G. 1974. Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 202–31.Google Scholar
Lees, R. B. 1963. The grammar of English nominalizations (Second ed.). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Levi, J. N. 1976. ‘A semantic analysis of Hebrew compound nominals’, in Cole, P. (ed.), Studies in Modern Hebrew syntax and semantics. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co., 9–55.Google Scholar
Marchand, H. 1965. ‘On the analysis of substantive compounds and suffixal derivatives not containing a verbal element’, Indogermanische Forschungen, LXX, 2, 117–45.Google Scholar
Mirkin, R. 1975. ‘al hamilim hazarot be'ivrit ve'al milon lamilim hazarot be'ivrit’, Leshonenu La'am, No. 260, 288–300.Google Scholar
Nir, R. 1971. ‘leverur mahuto šel haniv ha'ivri’, in Kodesh, S. (ed.), Kamrat Memorial Volume. Jerusalem: The Council on the Teaching of Hebrew, 108–15.Google Scholar
Nir, R. 1975. ‘hitraxavut hamilon ha'ivri keycad?’, Leshonenu La'am, Nos. 258–9, 249–61.Google Scholar
Ornan, U. 1976. ‘al yecirat šorašim xadašim ve'al kama milim mexudašot’, Leshonenu La'am, No. 269, 254–67.Google Scholar
Rabin, C. 1977. ‘anaxnu vehalason’, Me'asef Yerušalayim, Nos. 11–12, 37–49.Google Scholar
Rohrer, C. 1965. Die Wortzusammensetzung im modernen Fravzösisch, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tübingen.Google Scholar
Swaminathan, R. 1973. ‘The word’, IRAL, XI, 1, 29–49.Google Scholar
Téné, D. 1969. ‘Israeli Hebrew’, Ariel, No. 25, 48–63.Google Scholar
Ullmann, S. 1962. Semantics: an introduction to the science of meaning; Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar