Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T19:36:29.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On finite loops whose inner mapping groups are Abelian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Markku Niemenmaa
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Oulu, PL 3000, 90014 Oulu, Finland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Loops are nonassociative algebras which can be investigated by using their multiplication groups and inner mapping groups If the inner mapping group of a loop is finite and Abelian, then the multiplication group is a solvable group. It is clear that not all finite Abelian groups can occur as inner mapping groups of loops. In this paper we show that certain finite Abelian groups with a special structure are not isomorphic to inner mapping groups of finite loops. We use our results and show how to construct solvable groups which are not isomorphic to multiplication groups of loops.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2002

References

[1]Baer, R., ‘Erweiterung von Gruppen und ihren Isomorphismen’, Math. Z. 38 (1934), 375416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bruck, R.H., ‘Contributions to the theory of loops’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 60 (1946), 245354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Denes, J. and Keedwell, A., ‘A new authentication scheme based on latin squares’, Discrete Math. 106/107 (1992), 157161.Google Scholar
[4]Foguel, T. and Ungar, A., ‘Gyrogroups and the decomposition of groups into twisted subgroups and subgroups’, Pacific J. Math. 197 (2001), 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Huppert, B., Endliche Gruppen I, Die Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 134 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Kepka, T., ‘On the abelian inner permutation groups of loops’, Comm. Algebra. 26 (1998), 857861.Google Scholar
[7]Kepka, T. and Niemenmaa, M., ‘On loops with cyclic inner mapping groups’, Arch. Math. 60 (1993), 233236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Moore, C., Therien, D., Lemieux, F., Berman, J. and Drisko, A., ‘Circuits and expressions with nonassociative gates’, J. Comput. System Sci. 60 (2000), 368394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Niemenmaa, M., ‘On the structure of the inner mapping groups of loops’, Comm. Algebra 24 (1996), 135142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Niemenmaa, M. and Kepka, T., ‘On multiplication groups of loops’, J. Algebra 135 (1990), 112122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Niemenmaa, M. and Kepka, T., ‘On connected transversals to abelian subgroups’, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 49 (1994), 121128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Pflugfelder, H.O., ‘Historical notes on loop theory’, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 41 (2000), 359370.Google Scholar
[13]Phillips, J.D., ‘A note on simple groups and simple loops’, in Proceedings of the Groups (Korea 1998) (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 2000), pp. 305317.Google Scholar
[14]Smith, J.D.H., ‘Loops and quasigroups: aspects of current work and prospects for the future’, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 41 (2000), 415427.Google Scholar
[15]Vesanen, A., ‘Solvable loops and groups’, J. Algebra 180 (1996), 862876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar