Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T20:58:25.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ON A CERTAIN GENERALISATION OF THE ITERATED FUNCTION SYSTEM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2012

FILIP STROBIN*
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, Łódź University of Technology, Wólczańska 215, 93-005 Łódź, Poland (email: filip.strobin@p.lodz.pl)
JAROSŁAW SWACZYNA
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, Łódź University of Technology, Wólczańska 215, 93-005 Łódź, Poland (email: jswaczyna@wp.pl)
*
For correspondence; e-mail: filip.strobin@p.lodz.pl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We follow the idea of generalising the notion of classical iterated function systems, as presented by Mihail and Miculescu. We give their deliberations a more general setting and, using this general approach, study the generic aspect of the problem of existence of an attractor of a function system.

MSC classification

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 2012

References

[B]Barnsley, M. F., Fractals Everywhere (Academic Press, Boston, 1993).Google Scholar
[Br]Browder, F., ‘On the convergence of successive approximations for nonlinear functional equations’, Indag. Math. 30 (1968), 2735.Google Scholar
[DM]De Blasi, F. and Myjak, J., ‘Sur la porosité de l’ensemble des contractions sans point fixe’, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 308 (1989), 5154.Google Scholar
[GD]Granas, A. and Dugundji, J., Fixed Point Theory, Springer Monographs in Mathematics (Springer, New York, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[H]Hutchinson, J., ‘Fractals and self-similarity’, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30(5) (1981), 713747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[J]Jachymski, J. and Jóźwik, I., ‘Nonlinear contractive conditions: a comparison and related problems’, Banach Center Publ. 77 (2007), 123146.Google Scholar
[M]Mihail, A., ‘Recurrent iterated function systems’, Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl. 53(1) (2008), 4353.Google Scholar
[Ma]Máté, L., ‘The Hutchinson–Barnsley theorey for certain noncontraction mappings’, Period. Math. Hungar. 27(1) (1993), 2133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[MM1]Mihalil, A. and Miculescu, R., ‘Applications of fixed point theorems in the theory of generalized IFS’, Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2008 (2008), article ID 312876, 11 pp;doi:10.1155/2008/312876.Google Scholar
[MM2]Michalil, A. and Miculescu, R., ‘Generalized IFSs on noncompact spaces’, Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2010 (2010), article ID 584215, 11 pp; doi:10.1155/2010/584215.Google Scholar
[S1]Strobin, F., Genericity and Porosity of Some Subsets of Function Spaces, Doctorial Dissertation, Polish Academy of Sciences, 2011.Google Scholar
[S2]Strobin, F., ‘Some porous and meager sets of continuous mappings’, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 13(2) (2012), 351361.Google Scholar
[S3]Strobin, F., ‘σ-porous sets of generalized nonexpansive mappings’, Fixed Point Theory, to appear.Google Scholar
[Se]Serban, M., ‘Fixed point theorems for operators on Cartesian product spaces and applications’, Semin. Fixed Point Theory Cluj-Napoca 3 (2002), 163172.Google Scholar
[RZ1]Reich, S. and Zaslavski, A., ‘Almost all nonexpansive mappings are contractive’, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Soc. R. Can. 22(3) (2000), 118124.Google Scholar
[RZ2]Reich, S. and Zaslavski, A., ‘The set of noncontractive mappings is σ-porous in the space of all nonexpansive mappings’, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 333(6) (2001), 539544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Z1]Zajíček, L., ‘Porosity and σ-porosity’, Real Anal. Exchange 13(2) (1987/88), 314350.Google Scholar
[Z2]Zajíček, L., ‘On σ-porous sets in abstract spaces’, Abstr. Appl. Anal. 5 (2005), 509534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar