Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T03:05:42.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Erratum: Two hyperbolic Shwarz lemmas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

L. Bernal-González
Affiliation:
Departmento de Análisis Matemático, Facultad de Matemáticas, Apdo, 1160, Avenida Reina Mercedes41080 SevillaSpain, e-mail: lbernal@us.es, mccm@us.es
M. C. Calderón-Moreno
Affiliation:
Departmento de Análisis Matemático, Facultad de Matemáticas, Apdo, 1160, Avenida Reina Mercedes41080 SevillaSpain, e-mail: lbernal@us.es, mccm@us.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In [1] there is an error, as pointed out to us by J.M. Isidro. In that paper we consider the set Rm of all m-rotations, that is, Rm = {czm: |c| = 1}; the set Aut() of the automorphisms of the unit disc  and the set of the m-automorphisms of , Autm () = {ψ ∘ R ∘ ϕ : ψ, ϕ ∈ Aut(), RRm}. We asserted that

where ϕa(Z) = (a − z)/(1 − āz). Equality (1) is not true. For instance, it suffices to consider f (z) = ϕ¼ ∘ ∘ z2 ∘ ϕ½. We have that f ∈ Aut2 (), f (0) = (0) and, after calculations, f (z) = (7z2 − 6z)/(6z − 7). Then it is evident that will never hold f (z) = ϕ0R ∘ ϕ0 with RR2, because ϕ0 is equal to identity.

Type
Correction
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2003

References

[1]Bernal-González, L. and Calderón-Moreno, M.C., ‘Two hyperbolic Schwarz lemmas’, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 66 (2002), 1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar