Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-5mhkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T14:14:37.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterizations of invertible, unitary, and normal composition operators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

R.K. Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Jammu, Jammu, Tawi, India.
Ashok Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Jammu, Jammu, Tawi, India.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let Cφ be a composition operator on L2(λ), where λ is a σ-finite measure on a set X. Conditions under which Cφ is invertible, unitary, and normal are investigated in this paper.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1979

References

[1]Choksi, J.R., “Measurable transformations on compact groups”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 184 (1973), 101124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Halmos, Paul R., Measure theory (Van Nostrand, Toronto, New York, London, 1950. Reprinted: 1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Halmos, Paul R., A Hilbert space problem book (Van Nostrand, Princeton, New Jersey; Toronto; London; 1967).Google Scholar
[4]Sikorski, Roman, Boolean algebras, 3rd edition (Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 25. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Singh, Raj Kishor, “Composition operators” (Doctoral dissertation, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, 1972).Google Scholar
[6]Singh, Raj Kishor, “Compact and quasinormal composition operators”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 45 (1974), 8082.Google Scholar
[7]Singh, R.K., “Composition operators induced bŷ rational functions”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 59 (1976), 329333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Singh, R.K. and Kumar, Ashok, “Multiplication operators and composition operators with closed ranges”, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 16 (1977), 247252.Google Scholar