Skip to main content Accessibility help

Upwind flight by gravid australian sheep blowflies, Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae), in response to stimuli from sheep

  • C. H. Eisemann (a1)


Groups of gravid females of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) in a 1-m3 cage flew upwind in response to sheep placed upwind of the cage. No downwind flight or other response was observed to sheep placed downwind of the fly cage. Flystruck sheep stimulated the greatest accumulation of flies on the upwind cage wall (46% of the caged flies), followed by sound wet sheep (29%) and sound dry sheep (19%). All sheep tested caused significantly more flies to accumulate on the upwind wall than did controls consisting of either no bait or a man placed upwind (14%). Struck sheep elicited significant upwind movement of flies at distances of up to 20 m; sound, dry sheep did so only up to 10 m. It was concluded that L. cuprina is able to orient from a distance in response to volatile sheep kairomones; kairomones from dry sheep are augmented by wetting or the presence of cutaneous myiasis, as indicated by an enhanced fly response. The experiments performed did not exclude a role for visual or thermal cues in blowfly orientation to sheep.



Hide All
Browne, L. B. & Rogoff, W. M. (1959). The “sheep factor” and oviposition in Lucilia cuprina.—Aust. J. Sci. 21, 189190.
Conover, W. J. (1980). Practical nonparametric statistics.—2nd edn, 493 pp. New York, Wiley.
Cragg, J. B. (1950). The reactions of Lucilia sericata (Mg.) to various substances placed on sheep.—Parasitology 40, 179186.
Cragg, J. B. (1956). The olfactory behaviour of Lucilia species (Diptera) under natural conditions.—Ann. appl. Biol. 44, 467477.
Cragg, J. B. & Ramage, G. R. (1945). Chemotropic studies on the blow-flies Lucilia sericata (Mg.) and Lucilia caesar (L.).—Parasitology 36, 168175.
Dallwitz, R., Roberts, J. A. & Kitching, R. L. (1984). Factors determining the predominance of Lucilia cuprina larvae in blowfly strikes of sheep in southern New South Wales.—J. Aust. entomol. Soc. 23, 175177.
David, C. T., Kennedy, J. S., Ludlow, A. R., Perry, J. N. & Wall, C. (1982). A reappraisal of insect flight towards a distant point source of wind-borne odor.—J. Chem. Ecol. 8, 12071215.
Daykin, P. N., Kellogg, F. E. & Wright, R. H. (1965). Host-finding and repulsion of Aedes aegypti.Can. Ent. 97, 239263.
Eisemann, C. H. (1985). A study of aspects of the host-finding behaviour of the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina (Wied.) and of the structure, distribution and behavioural significance of its antennal and palpal sensilla.—246 pp. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Queensland.
Eisemann, C. H. & Rice, M. J. (1987). The origin of sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae), attractants in media infested with larvae.—Bull. ent. Res. 77, 287294.
Freney, M. R. (1937). Studies on the chemotropic behaviour of sheep blowflies.—Pamph. Coun. scient. ind. Res., Aust. no. 74, 24 pp.
Hawkes, C. (1974). Dispersal of adult cabbage root fly (Erioischia brassicae (Bouché)) in relation to a brassica crop.—J. appl. Ecol. 11, 8393.
Hobson, R. P. (1935). Sheep blowfly investigations. II. Substances which induce Lucilia sericata Mg. to oviposit on sheep.—Ann. appl. Biol. 22, 294300.
Hobson, R. P. (1936). Sheep blow-fly investigations. III. Observations on the chemotropism of Lucilia sericata Mg.Ann. appl. Biol. 23, 845851.
Kennedy, J. S. (1940). The visual responses of flying mosquitoes.—Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. (A) 109, 221242.
Kennedy, J. S. (1977). Olfactory responses to distant plants and other odor sources.—pp. 67–91 in Shorey, H. H. & McKelvey, J. J. Jr. (Eds). Chemical control of insect behavior.—414 pp. New York, Wiley.
Kennedy, J. S. (1978). The concepts of olfactory ‘arrestment' and ‘attraction'.—Physiol. Entomol. 3, 9198.
Kennedy, J. S. (1983). Zigzagging and casting as a programmed response to wind-borne odour: a review.—Physiol. Entomol. 8, 109120.
Mackerras, I. M. & Mackerras, M. J. (1944). Sheep blowfly investigations: the attractiveness of sheep for Lucilia cuprina.—Bull. Coun. scient. ind Res., Melb. no. 181, 44 pp.
Rice, M. J. (1986). Semiochemicals and sensory manipulation strategies for behavioural management of Heliothis spp. Ochsenheimer (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).—pp. 27–45 in Zalucki, M. P. & Twine, P. H. (Eds). Proceedings of the Heliothis Ecology Workshop, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 18–19 July, 1985.—159 pp. Brisbane, Qd, Dep. Primary Ind.
Riches, J. H. & O'Sullivan, P. J. (1955). The value of DDT, BHC, aldrin and dieldrin for the protection of sheep against body strike.—Aust. vet. J. 31, 258262.
Tillyard, R. J. & Seddon, H. R. (Eds). (1933). The sheep blowfly problem in Australia. Report no. 1 by the Joint Blowfly Committee.—Pamph. Coun. scient. ind. Res., Aust. no. 37, 136 pp. (Also as Sci. Bull. Dep. Agric. N.S.W. no. 40).
Vale, G. A. (1974). The responses of tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) to mobile and stationary baits.—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 545588.
Warnes, M. L. & Finlayson, L. H. (1985). Responses of the stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans (L.) (Diptera: Muscidae), to carbon dioxide and host odours. II. Orientation.—Bull. ent. Res. 75, 717727.
Woodburn, T. L. & Vogt, W. G. (1982). Attractiveness of Merino sheep before and after death to adults of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae).—J. Aust. entomol. Soc. 21, 131134.
Wright, R. H. (1958). The olfactory guidance of flying insects.—Can. Ent. 90, 8189.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Upwind flight by gravid australian sheep blowflies, Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae), in response to stimuli from sheep

  • C. H. Eisemann (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.