Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T06:53:29.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on Wheat Bulb Fly, Leptohylemyia Coarctata, Fall

II. Numbers in Relation to Crop Damage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

H. C. Gough
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University, Leeds.

Extract

A detailed quantitative study of the incidence and development of an attack of wheat bulb fly on a field in East Yorkshire is described. The numbers of larvae, puparia, plants, and shoots, and the percentage of plants and shoots attacked, were estimated on various dates. This information is graphically summarised in fig. 1. Similar information was obtained from other fields in 1944 and 1945. No single factor could be correlated with the effect of the attack on the crop.

The number of larvae ranged up to nearly 600,000 per acre, but high numbers did not invariably result in a poor crop. A high percentage of plants or shoots attacked was not necessarily associated with crop failure. The number of shoots per plant at the time the larvae hatch was important and in some cases attack stimulated tillering. It is suggested that a study of the rate at which damage occurs would lead to a better understanding of the reaction of any crop to pest attack.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (19331938). Precision wheat sampling observations. Quarterly Reports.—J. Minist. Agric., 40–45.Google Scholar
Becker, J. & Blunck, H. (1927). Die Getreideblumenfliege in ihren Beziehungen zu Nässe, Bodenart und Vorfrucht.—Landw. Wbl. Schles.-Holst., 77, p. 1129.Google Scholar
Bremer, H. (1929). Zur Methodik epidemiologischer Untersuchung von Getreidefliegen-Kalamitäten.—Anz. Schädlingsk., 5, p. 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, H. (1931). Beitrag zur Epidemiologie der Brachfliegenschäden (Hylemyia coarctata, Fall.).—Z. angew. Ent., 18, p. 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crüger, O. & Körting, A. (1931). Ueber die Eiablage der Getreideblumenfliege und die unmittelbare Voraussage ihres Schad-Auftretens.—Z. PflKrankh., 41, p. 49.Google Scholar
Gemmill, J. F. (1927). On the life history and bionomics of the wheat bulb fly (Leptohylemyia coarctata, Fall.).—Proc. R. phys. Soc. Edinb., 21, p. 133.Google Scholar
Gough, H. C. (1946). Studies on wheat bulb fly (Leptohylemyia coarctata, Fall.). I. Biology.—Bull. ent. Res., 37, pp. 251271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleine, R. (1915). Die Getreideblumenfliege, Hylemyia coarctata, Fall. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis ihrer Biologie und ihrer Bedeutung für die Landwirtschaft.—Z. angew. Ent., 2, p. 360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleine, R. (1918). Diesjährige Beobachtungen in Pommern.—Z. angew. Ent., 4, p. 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDougall, R. S. (1932). Insect Pests No. XIV.—Scot. J. Agric., 15, p. 184.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture (1943). Wheat bulb fly.—Adv. Leafl. Minist. Agric. Fish., Lond., no. 177.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture. (1944). Wireworms and food production.—Bull. Minist. Agric. Fish., Lond., no. 128.Google Scholar
Molz, E. (1918). Zur Biologie der Getreideblumenfliege (Hylemyia coarctata, Fall.).—Z. angew. Ent., 4, p. 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petherbridge, F. R. (1921). Observations on the life history of the wheat bulb fly (Leptohylemyia coarctata, Fall.).—J. agric. Sci., 11, p. 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petherbridge, F. R. & Stapley, J. H. (1944). Two important wheat pests.—Agriculture, 51, p. 320.Google Scholar
Petherbridge, F. R. & Wood, J. (1945). Wheat bulb fly experiments.—Agriculture, 52, p. 351.Google Scholar
Rostrup, S. (1924). Kornets Blomsterflue (Hylemyia coarctata) i Danmark 1903–23.—Tidsskr. Planteavl, 30, p. 713.Google Scholar
Russell, E. J. & Watson, D. J. (1940). The Rothamsted field experiments on the growth of wheat.— Tech. Comm. Imp. Bur. Soil Sci., no. 40.Google Scholar
Schnauer, W. (1929). Untersuchungen über Schadgebiet und Umweltfaktoren einiger landwirtschaftlicher Schädlinge in Deutschland auf Grund statistischer Unterlagen.—Z. angew. Ent., 16, p. 565.Google Scholar