Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-26T03:07:55.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shot-hole borer (Xyleborus fornicatus Eichh.) of tea in Ceylon. I.—Chemical control and population dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. E. Cranham
J. E. Cranham
Affiliation:
Tea Research Institute of Ceylon, Talawakele, Geylon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1960–63, fifteen field trials were carried out on tea estates in Ceylon to find whether dieldrin at 1–5 or 3 Ib. per acre applied as a spray to the tea bushes immediately after pruning would afford control of the shot-hole borer, Xyleborus fornicatus Eichh. Koutine sampling by a method that is described was carried out for three years after spraying, and fluctuations in the numbers of live stages and galleries of the Scolytid were recorded.

In unsprayed plots, the beetle population left in the old wood of the tea bushes after pruning at first declined, but began to rise about nine months later. Sampling was then continued in the new wood that grew after pruning. In this, the numbers of galleries and live stages increased to a major peak late in the second or early in the third year and then declined; there was a smaller increase later in the third year in several of the trials. By comparison, dieldrin at 1·5 lb. per acre greatly delayed the build-up of attack and effected an average reduction in gallery numbers of 81 per cent, by the eighteenth month and 70 per cent, by the twenty-fourth month. The main peak of attack was delayed until the early part of the third year, and the maximum level averaged only about half of that on unsprayed plots; but control in the third year was less satisfactory and more variable than in the second year. Spraying with dieldrin at 3 lb. per acre did not give better control, and no difference in effectiveness was found between 1·5 lb. applied as a high-volume (90 gal. per acre) and a low-volume (8 gal.) spray.

Special sampling in two trials revealed that reinfestation of sprayed plots began at edges adjacent to infested unsprayed plots and continued progressively inwards. It is concluded that the duration of control from spraying will be influenced by the size of the area sprayed and the proximity of infested tea fields, and that on estates, where fields of 20–40 acres would be sprayed, the level of control will be at least as good as that observed in the trial plots of 5–10 acres.

The main drawback to the use of dieldrin is that it induces outbreaks of tea tortrix, Homona coffearia (Nietn.), by killing off the parasite Macrocentrus homonae Nixon. The possible use of less persistent insecticides is discussed, together with the timing of chemical control measures in relation to cultural practices.

The numbers of open galleries (entrances visible) were closely correlated with those of live stages of the beetle up to the time of peak attack and less closely afterwards, probably because the entrance holes healed up at varying rates. The proportion of immature stages (eggs, larvae and pupae) in the population fell from the first to the third year; the fall was most rapid in unsprayed plots after the second-year peak of attack. One-tenth of adult beetles counted were males, but the true proportion in the broods was estimated to be between one-third and one-fifth. The frequency distribution of gallery numbers showed that invasion of new wood starts at random and becomes increasingly over-dispersed (more uniform) as the density rises. This would be expected if there is a maximum density of galleries that is much the same in all the tea bushes. There was some evidence for a density-dependent regulation of borer numbers brought about by intra-specific competition for wood suited to gallery formation and brood-rearing. Other possible factors influencing density are discussed.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , June 1966 , pp. 481 - 504
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, G. D. (1955). Report of the Officer-in-Charge Passara Sub-Station for the year 1954.–Bull. Tea Res. Inst. Ceylon no. 36 pp. 54–56.Google Scholar
Austin, G. D. (1956). Historical review of shot-hole borer investigations.—Tea Quart. 27 pp. 97–102.Google Scholar
Baptist, B. A. (1956). The tea leaf-eating tortrix caterpillar (Homona coffearia Nietn.) as a limiting factor in insecticidal applications on tea.—Tea Quart. 27 pp. 28–35.Google Scholar
Browne, F. G. (1961). The biology of Malayan Scolytidae and Platypodidae.—Malay. For. Rec. no. 22, 255 pp.Google Scholar
Calnaido, D. (1964). Studies of the “population-ecology” of the shot-hole borer—Xyleborus fornicatus Eichh.—in tea in Ceylon.—Tea Quart. 35 pp. 41–51.Google Scholar
Cranham, J. E. (1961a). Report of the entomologist for 1960.—Rep. Tea Res. Inst. Ceylon 1960 pp. 58–65.Google Scholar
Cranham, J. E. (1961b). The chemical control of shot-hole borer (Xyleborus fornicatus Eichh.) on tea.—Tea Quart. 32 pp. 171–184.Google Scholar
Cranham, J. E. (1962). Report of the entomologist for 1961.—Rep. Tea Res. Inst. Ceylon 1961 pp. 71–80.Google Scholar
Cranham, J. E. (1963). Report of the entomologist for 1962.—Rep. Tea Res. Inst. Ceylon 1962 pt. 2 pp. 50–69.Google Scholar
Cranham, J. E. (1964). Report of the entomologist for 1963.—Rep. Tea Res. Inst. Ceylon 1963 pt. 2 pp. 74–90.Google Scholar
Cranham, J. E., Danthanarayana, W. –: Ranaweera, D. J. W. (1962). The chemical control of shot-hole borer with dieldrin: interim report on estate trials, 1960–1961.—Tea Quart. 33 pp. 5–33.Google Scholar
Cranham, J. E., & Kathiravetpillai, A. (1964). Some factors affecting the efficiency of dieldrin sprays for shot-hole borer control—Tea Quart. 35 pp. 189–195.Google Scholar
Gadd, C. H. (1941a). The life-history of shot-hole borer of tea.—Tea Quart. 14 pp. 5–22.Google Scholar
Gadd, C. H. (1941b). Observations on an attack by shot-hole borer on tea.—Tea Quart. 14 pp. 132–146.Google Scholar
Gadd, C. H. (1944a). An unusual correlation between insect damage and crop harvested.—Ann. appl. Biol. 31 pp. 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadd, C. H. (1944b). A further note on an unusual correlation between insect damage and crop harvested.—Ann. appl. Biol. 31 pp. 250–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadd, C. H. (1946a). Studies of shot-hole borer of tea. 1.—Distribution and nomenclature.—Tea Quart. 18 pp. 46–54.Google Scholar
Gadd, C. H. (1946b). Studies of shot-hole borer of tea. 2.—Galleries.—Tea Quart. 18 pp. 114–124.Google Scholar
Gadd, C. H. (1947a). Studies of shot-hole borer of tea. III.—Damage to the tea bush.—Tea Quart. 19 pp. 96–101.Google Scholar
Gadd, C. H. (1947b). Observations on the life-cycle of Xyleborus fornicatus Eich-hoff in artificial culture.—Ann. appl. Biol. 34pp. 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadd, C. H. (1949a). Studies of shot-hole borer of tea. IV.—Life cycle of the beetle.—Tea Quart. 20 pp. 61–65.Google Scholar
Gadd, C. H. (1949b). Studies of shot-hole borer of tea. V.—Borer population.—Tea Quart. 20 pp. 66–76.Google Scholar
Gadd, C. H. & Loos, C. A. (1947). The ambrosia fungus of Xyleborus fornicatus Eich.—Trans. Brit, mycol Soc. 31 pp. 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. G. (1957). The distribution of insects in the air and the empirical relation of density to height.—J.Anim. Ecol. 26 pp. 479–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. G., Taylok, L. B. & Southwood, T. E. E. (1962). High altitude migration of Oscinella frit L. (Diptera: Chloropidae).—J. Anim,. Ecol. 31 pp. 373–383.Google Scholar
Judenko, E. (1958a). Preliminary small-scale field experiments on a chemical method for the prevention of shot-hole borer (Xyleborus fornicatus Eich.) attack on tea in plucking.—Tea Quart. 29 pp. 115–124.Google Scholar
Judenko, E. (1958b). Trials with a method of assessment of infestation caused by shot-hole borer (Xyleborus fornicatus Eich.) on old tea.—Tea Quart. 29 pp. 51–59.Google Scholar
Judenko, E. (1958c). The appearance of adult shot-hole borers (Xyleborus fornicatus Eich.) outside their galleries under natural conditions.—Tea Quart. 29 pp. 104–111.Google Scholar
Judenko, E. (1960). Further small-scale field experiments on the chemical control of attack by shot-hole borer (Xyleborus fornicatus Eich.) on tea in plucking.—Tea Quart. 31 pp. 19–25.Google Scholar
Judenko, E., Shanmugam, C. & Hasselo, H. N. (1962). Field experiments on the chemical control of shot-hole borer (Xyleborus fornicatus Eichh.) on tea soon after pruning.—Tea Quart. 33 pp. 69–87.Google Scholar
Newton, A. P. (1960). Control of shot-hole borer with Dieldrex.—Tea Quart. 31 pp. 172–175.Google Scholar
Rau, S. A. (1956). Address by Mr. S. Ananda Bau, entomologist, United Planters' Association of Southern India.—Tea Quart. 27 pp. 123–124.Google Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A. (1962). Ecology of Scolytidae.—Annu. Rev. Ent. 7 pp. 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salt, G. & Hollick, F. S. J. (1946). Studies on wireworm populations. II. Spatial distribution.—J. exp. Biol. 23 pp. 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedl, K. E. (1959). A check list of the Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleop-tera) of Ceylon with descriptions of new species and biological notes.—Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Land. 111 pp. 469–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar