Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T05:17:26.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selectivity of insecticides to Encarsia pergandiella (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), an endoparasitoid of Bemisia argentifolii (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

P.A. Stansly  and
T.-X. Liu
P.A. Stansly
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, PO Box 5127, Immokalee, FL 34143–5002, USA
T.-X. Liu
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, PO Box 5127, Immokalee, FL 34143–5002, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Encarsia pergandiella Howard is the most abundant parasitoid of silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia argentifolii Bellows & Perring, in south Florida vegetable fields and can contribute significantly to natural biological control of this and other whitefly species. However, quality standards, costs, and risks in commercial tomato production are high, resulting in frequent recourse to chemical control. Therefore, successful utilization of biological control could depend on compatibility of the parasitoid with selective insecticides. We tested a wide range of potentially selective insecticides, represented by a mineral oil, an insecticidal soap, a neem seed extract and synthetic and natural sugar esters, against eggs, first and third instar larvae, pupae and adults, using a pyrethroid, CaptureR (20 g bifenthrin/1 EC), for comparison. CaptureR residues on nymphs exposed to adult parasitoids reduced parasitization more than other materials tested, and were most toxic to all parasitoid stages. Mineral oil caused high mortality to immature parasitoids, and residues reduced parasitization of E. pergandiella. However, oil residues were much less toxic to adults if applied as a spray to leaf surfaces than as a dip to a leaf and especially glass surfaces. In contrast, the toxicity of CaptureR was high regardless of bioassay method. Neem extract, insecticidal soap and both sugar esters tested had little or no effect on E. pergandiella. These latter materials could be considered selective in respect to E. pergandiella and might be used to suppress B. argentifolii without decimating parasitoid populations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 87 , Issue 5 , October 1997 , pp. 525 - 531
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bentz, J.-A. & Neal, J.W. Jr. (1995) Effects of a natural insecticide from Nicotiana gossei on the whitefly parasitoid Encarsia formosa (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 88, 1611–1615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chortyk, O.T., Pomonis, J.G. & Johnson, A.W. (1996) Syntheses and characterizations of insecticidal sucrose esters. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. (1993) Systematic studies of New World Encarsia species and a survey of the parasitoids of Bemisia tabaci in Florida, the Caribbean and Latin America. PhD Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.Google Scholar
Freund, R.J., Littell, R.C. & Spector, P.C. (1986) SAS system for linear models. 210 pp. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
Gerling, D. (1966) Studies with whitefly parasites of Southern California. I. Encarsia pergandiella Howard (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Canadian Entomology 98, 707–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, K.A. & Gomez, A.A. (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 680 pp. 2nd edn, New York, John and Wiley.Google Scholar
Harbaugh, B.K. & Mattson, R.H. (1976) Insecticide effects on Encarsia formosa Gahan, parasite of the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood). Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Sciences 101, 228–233.Google Scholar
Hoogcarspel, A.P. & Jobsen, J.A. (1984) Laboratory method for testing the side-effects of pesticides on Encarsia formosa (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Results with pesticides used on tomato in glasshouses in the Netherlands. Journal of Applied Entomology 97, 268–278.Google Scholar
Ledieu, M.S. (1979) Laboratory and glasshouse screening of pesticides for adverse effects on the parasite Encarsia formosa Gahan. Pesticide Science 10, 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, T.-X. & Stansly, P.A. (1995a) Toxicity and repellency of biorational insecticides to Bemisia argentifolii on tomato plants. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 74, 137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, T.-X. & Stansly, P.A. (1995b) Toxicity of some selected biorational insecticides to Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on tomato plants. Journal of Economic Entomology 88, 564–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, T.-X. & Stansly, P.A. (1996) Development, oviposition and survivorship of Encarsia pergandiella (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), parasitoids of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 88, 96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAuslane, H.J., Johnson, F.A., Knauft, D.A. & Colvin, D.L. (1994) Seasonal abundance and within-plant distribution of parasitoids of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in peanuts. Environmental Entomology 22, 1043–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAuslane, H.J., Johnson, F.A., Sojack, B. & Colvin, D.L. (1995) Influence of foliar pubescence on abundance and parasitism of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on soybean. Environmental Entomology 24, 1135–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oomen, P.A. (1985) Encarsia formosa Gahan (Aphelinidae: Hymenoptera). pp. 221–222in Hassan, S.A. et al. (Eds) Standard methods to test the side-effects of pesticides on natural enemies of insects and mites developed by the IOBC/WPRS working group ‘Pesticides and beneficial organisms’. Bulletin of OEPP 15, 214–255.Google Scholar
Osborne, L.S., Hoelmer, K.M. & Gerling, D. (1990) Prospects for biological control of Bemisia tabaci. Bulletin of SROP/WPRS 13, 153–160.Google Scholar
Perring, T.M., Cooper, A.D., Rodrigez, R.J., Farrar, C.A. & Bellows, T.S. Jr. (1993) Identification of a whitefly species by genomic and behavioral studies. Science 259, 74–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polaszek, A., Evans, G.A. & Bennett, F.D. (1992) Encarsia parasitoids of Bemisia tabaci (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae, Homoptera: Aleyrodidae): a preliminary guide to identification. Bulletin of Entomological Research 82, 374–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (1988) SAS/STAT user's guide. Cary, North Carolina, SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Schuster, D.J., Funderburk, J.E. & Stansly, P.A. (1996) Selected IPM programs: tomato. pp. 387–412. in Rosen, D., Bennett, F.D. & Capinera, J.L. (Eds) Pest management in the subtropicals: integrated pest management: a Florida perspective. Andover, UK, Intercept.Google Scholar
Stansly, P.A., Schuster, D.J. & McAuslane, H.J. (1994) Biological control of silverleaf whitefly: an evolving sustainable technology. pp. 484–491. in Campbell, K.L., Graham, W.D. & Bottcher, A.B. (Eds) Environmentally sound agriculture. Proceedings of the Second Conference,20–22 April 1994,Orlando, Florida.American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stansly, P.A., Liu, T.-X., Schuster, D.J. &. Dean, D.E. (1996) Role of insecticides in management of Bemisia. pp. 605–615. in Gerling, D. & Mayer, R.T. (Eds). Bemisia: 1995 taxonomy, biology, control and management. Andover UK, Intercept.Google Scholar