Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T05:38:06.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Role of modified CDC miniature light-traps as an alternative method for sampling adult anophelines (Diptera: Culicidae) in the National Mosquito Surveillance Programme in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

C. Sadanandane ,
P. Jambulingam  and
S. Subramanian
C. Sadanandane*
Affiliation:
Vector Control Research Centre (ICMR), Medical Complex, Indira Nagar, Pondicherry 605006, India
P. Jambulingam
Affiliation:
Vector Control Research Centre (ICMR), Medical Complex, Indira Nagar, Pondicherry 605006, India
S. Subramanian
Affiliation:
Vector Control Research Centre (ICMR), Medical Complex, Indira Nagar, Pondicherry 605006, India
*
*Fax: +91-413-2272041 E-mail: mailto:vcrc@vsnl.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The efficiency of modified CDC miniature light-traps for sampling adult mosquitoes was evaluated in comparison with indoor resting, outdoor resting, indoor man-landing and outdoor man-landing collections in the hilly district of Koraput, Orissa, India. Overall, light-traps captured 78% of adult mosquitoes collected by all methods. Of the 16 anopheline species recorded in the study area, light-traps effectively sampled 13, contributing about 72% of the total anophelines collected by all methods. Light-traps also caught a large number of female Culex vishnui Theobald (96%). As fully-fed mosquitoes were predominant (82%) and caught alive, light-traps can be used to catch large numbers of vector mosquitoes for studies on vector prevalence, distribution, vector incrimination and also for laboratory bioassays. Light-trap and indoor resting collections revealed similar seasonal trends in numbers of Anopheles culicifacies Giles, A. fluviatilis James, A. jeyporiensis James, A. vagus Doenitz, and A. splendidus Koidzumi. Age-structure of the samples did not vary significantly between the two methods. Light-traps could be used as an alternative to daytime indoor resting collections to monitor the seasonal fluctuations in the abundance and parity rates of these species. The light-trap collections correlated with indoor and outdoor man-landing collections of A. jeyporiensis and the outdoor man-landing collections of A. maculatusTheobald in measuring seasonal trends. Light-trap collections can thus be used as a substitute for man-landing collections of A. jeyporiensis and A. maculatus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 94 , Issue 1 , February 2004 , pp. 55 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carnevale, P. (1974) Comparison de trois methods de capture pour l'échantillonnage d'une population d'Anopheles nili (Theobald), 1904. Cahiers ORSTOM, Série Entomologie Médicale et Parasitologie 12, 135–144.Google Scholar
Carnevale, P. & Le Pont, F. (1973) Epidemiologie du paludisme humain en Republique Populaire du Congo. II. Utilisation des pièges lumineux ‘CDC’ comme moyen d'échantillonnage des populations anophéliennes. Cahiers ORSTOM, Série Entomologie Médicale et Parasitologie 11, 263–270.Google Scholar
CostantiniC., C.,SagnonN.F., N.F.,SanogoE., E.,Merza, L. & Colluzi, M. (1998) Relationship to human biting collections and influence of light and bednets in CDC light-trap catches of West African malaria vectors. Bulletin of Entomological Research 88, 503–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DasP.K., P.K.,GunasekaranK., K.,SahuS.S., S.S.,Sadanandane, C. & Jambulingam, P. (1990) Seasonal prevalence and resting behaviour of malaria vectors in Koraput district, Orissa state. Indian Journal of Malariology 27, 173–181.Google Scholar
DavisJ.R., J.R.,HallT., T.,CheeE.M., E.M.,MajalaA., A.,Minjas, J. & Shiff, C.J. (1995) Comparison of sampling anopheline mosquitoes by light-trap and human-bait collections indoors at Bagamoyo, Tanzania. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 9, 249–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Detinova, T.S. (1962) Age-grouping methods in Diptera of medical importance. With special reference to some vectors of malaria. World Health Organization Monograph Series 47, p. 216.Google ScholarPubMed
Gills, H.M. & Warell, D.A. (1993) Bruce-Chwatt's essential malariology. 3rd edn. 340 pp. London, Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
GithekoA.K., A.K.,ServiceM.W., M.W.,MbogoC.M., C.M.,Atieli, F.A. & Juma, F.O. (1994) Sampling Anopheles arabiensis, A. gambiae sensu lato and A. funestus (Diptera: Culicidae) with CDC light-traps near a rice irrigation area and a sugarcane belt in western Kenya. Bulletin of Entomological Research 84, 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GunasekaranK., K.,JambulingamP., P.,SadanandaneC., C.,Sahu, S.S. & Das, P.K. (1994) Reliability of light-trap sampling for Anopheles fluviatilis, a vector of malaria. Acta Tropica 58, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HiiJ.L., J.L.,SmithT., T.,MaiA., A.,Ibam, E. & Alpers, M.P. (2000) Comparison between anopheline mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) caught using different methods in a malaria endemic area of Papua New Guinea. Bulletin of Entomological Research 90, 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismail, I.A.H., Pinichpongse, S., Chitprarop, V., Prasittisuk, C. & Schepens, J. (1982) Trials with CDC and Monks Wood light-traps for sampling malaria vectors in Thailand. WHO/VBC/82.864, 7 pp. (mimeographed).Google Scholar
JambulingamP., P.,MohapatraS.S.S., S.S.S.,GovardhiniP., P.,DasL.K., L.K.,ManoharanA., A.,Pani, S.P. & Das, P.K. (1991) Microlevel epidemiological variations in malaria and its implications on control strategy. Indian Journal of Medical Research 93, 371–378.Google ScholarPubMed
LinesJ.D., J.D.,CurtisC.F., C.F.,Wilkes, T.J. & Njunwa, K.J. (1991) Monitoring human-biting mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Tanzania with light-traps hung beside mosquito nets. Bulletin of Entomological Research 81, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MagbityE.B., E.B.,LinesJ.D., J.D.,MarbiahM.T., M.T.,David, K. & Peterson, E. (2002). How reliable are light traps in estimating biting rates of adult Anopheles gambiae s.l (Diptera: Culicidae) in the presence of treated nets?. Bulletin of Entomological Research 92, 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MbogoC.N., C.N.,GlassG.E., G.E.,ForsterD., D.,KabiruE.W., E.W.,GithureJ.I., J.I.,Ouma, J.H. & Beier, J.C. (1993) Evaluation of light traps for sampling anopheline mosquitoes in Kilifi, Kenya. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 9, 141–144.Google ScholarPubMed
ParidaS.K., S.K.,GunasekaranK., K.,SadanandaneC., C.,PatraK.P., K.P.,Sahu, S.S. & Jambulingam, P. (1991) A note on infection rate and vectorial capacity of malaria vectors in Jeypore hill tracts. Indian Journal of Malariology 28, 207–213.Google Scholar
RajagopalanP.K., P.K.,DasP.K., P.K.,PaniS.P., S.P.,JambulingamP., P.,MohapatraS.S.S., S.S.S.,Gunasekaran, K. & Das, L.K. (1990) Parasitological aspects of malaria persistence in Koraput district Orissa, India. Indian Journal of Medical Research 91, 44–51.Google ScholarPubMed
Rao, T.R. (1984) The anophelines of India. 518 pp. Malaria Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi.Google Scholar
ReisenW.K., W.K.,BoyceK., K.,CummingsR.C., R.C.,DelgadoO., O.,GutierrezA., A.,Meyer, R.P. & Scott, T.W. (1999) Comparative effectiveness of three adult mosquito sampling methods in habitats representative of four different biomes of California. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 15, 24–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Rubio-Palis, Y. (1996) Evaluation of light-traps combined with carbon dioxide and 1-octen-3-ol to collect anophelines in Venezuela. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 12, 91–96.Google ScholarPubMed
Rubio-Palis, Y. & Curtis, C.F. (1992) Evaluation of different methods of catching anopheline mosquitoes in western Venezuela. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 8, 261–267.Google ScholarPubMed
Russell, P.F. & Santiago, D. (1934) An earth-lined trap for anopheline mosquitoes. Proceedings of Entomological Society of Washington 36, 1–21.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1981) Biometry. 859 pp. New York, Freeman.Google Scholar
Sudia, W.D. & Chamberlin, R.W. (1962) Battery-operated light-trap, an improved model. Mosquito News 22, 126–129.Google Scholar
UlloaA., A.,RodriguezM.H., M.H.,Rodriguez, A.D. & Roberts, D.R. (1997) A comparison of two collection methods for estimating abundance and parity of Anopheles albimanus in breeding sites and villages of southern Mexico. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 13, 238–244.Google ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (1975) Manual on practical entomology in malaria Part II, Materials and techniques, WHO Offset Publication No. 13, Geneva, pp. 80–86.Google Scholar