Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:27:39.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Morphology of the Larva of Serica brunnea, L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

W. F. Jepson
W. F. Jepson
Affiliation:
Imperial Institute of Entomology.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is a remarkable fact that out of the six commonly occurring species of the family Scarabaeidae (chafers, white grubs) in Britain, five are constantly reported as causing damage, either as grubs or as adults, to agricultural and forest crops. Thus, of the six species listed in Table I, only the last named, Anomala aenea, de Geer, which is very abundant locally on sand-dunes, finds agricultural conditions unsuitable to its existence.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 1937 , pp. 149 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature

Arrow, G. J. (1904). Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond. 1904, pp. 709–750, pl. xxxvi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böving, A. G. & Craighead, F. C. (1931). Ent. Amer. 11, pp 1–351, 125 pls.Google Scholar
Carpenter & Macdowell. (1912). Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 57, pp. 373–396, 5 figs.Google Scholar
Davis, J. J. (1916). J. Econ. Ent. 8, pp. 135–139, 3 pl.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decoppet, M. (1920). Le Hanneton. Payot, Geneva.Google Scholar
Edwards, E. E. (1931). J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.) 37, p. 93.Google Scholar
Erichson, W. F. (1848). Naturg. Ins. Deutschl. 3, Abt. I., 698 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. (1775). Ent. 36, p. 20.Google Scholar
Fryer, J. C. F. (1928). Misc. Publ. Minist. Agr. no. 62.Google Scholar
Hayes, W. P. (1929). Ill. Biol. Monogr. 12, no. 2, 119 pp., 15 p1., 3 pp. refs.Google Scholar
Houlbert & Monnot. (1915). Trav. Sci. Univ. Rennes 13, pp. 102–103, 1 fig.Google Scholar
Imms, A. D. (1925). General Textbook of Entomology, p. 109.Google Scholar
Linné, C. (1758). Syst. Nat. 10, p. 352, no. 49.Google Scholar
McColloch, J. W. (1917) Jour. Econ. Ent. 10, pp. 183–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIndoo, N. E. (1931). Smithson. Misc. Coll. 82, no. 18, p. 51.Google Scholar
Mingazzini, . (1889). Ricerche sul canale digerente dei Lamellicorni fitofagi.—Mitth. Zool. Sta. Neapel. 9.Google Scholar
Munro, J. W. (1927). Chafer Beetles.—For. Comm. Leafl. no. 17, 6 pp., 3 figs.Google Scholar
Ohaus, . (1899). Stett. Ent. Ztg. 61, pp. 9–10.Google Scholar
Perris, E. (1875). Ann. Soc. Linn. Lyon. 22.Google Scholar
Piochard de la Brûlerie, C. (1864). Ann. Soc. Ent. Fr. (4) 4, pp. 663–667, 1 tab., 7 figs.Google Scholar
Rittershaus, K. (1927). Z. Morph. Oek. 8, pp. 271–408, 149 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiödte, I. C. (1874). Naturh. Tidskr. (3) 9, pp. 227–376.Google Scholar
Taylor & Thompson. (1926). Ann. Appl. Biol. 15, pp. 258–262.Google Scholar
Werner, E. (1926). Z. Morph. Oek. 6, pp. 150–206, 16 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiedermann, J. F. (1930). Z. Morph. Oek. 19, pp. 228–258, 9 figs.Google Scholar
Willaume, F. (1924). Rev. Hist. Nat. Appl. (2) 5, pp. 44–64.Google Scholar
Willaume, F. (1927–1929). Rev. Zool. Agric. 26, pp. 185–201; 27, pp. 6–8, pp. 37–49; 28, pp. 5–12, 81–89.Google Scholar
Zambeu, . (1903). Ann. Soc. Linn. Lyon N. S. 49, pp. 136–138.Google Scholar