Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:54:33.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modification of the attractiveness of the primary pheromone component of the Egyptian cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), by secondary pheromone components and related chemicals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. G. Campion ,
P. Hunter-Jones ,
L. J. McVeigh ,
D. R. Hall ,
R. Lester  and
B. F. Nesbitt
D. G. Campion
Affiliation:
Centre for Overseas Pest Research, Overseas Development Administration, College House, Wrights Lane, London W8 5SJ, UK
P. Hunter-Jones
Affiliation:
Centre for Overseas Pest Research, Overseas Development Administration, College House, Wrights Lane, London W8 5SJ, UK
L. J. McVeigh
Affiliation:
Centre for Overseas Pest Research, Overseas Development Administration, College House, Wrights Lane, London W8 5SJ, UK
D. R. Hall
Affiliation:
Centre for Overseas Pest Research, Overseas Development Administration, College House, Wrights Lane, London W8 5SJ, UK
R. Lester
Affiliation:
Centre for Overseas Pest Research, Overseas Development Administration, College House, Wrights Lane, London W8 5SJ, UK
B. F. Nesbitt
Affiliation:
Tropical Products Institute, Overseas Development Administration, 56–62 Gray’s Inn Road, London WCIX 8 LU, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Known components of the female sex pheromone of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.), tetradecyl acetate (I), (Z)-9-tetradecenyl acetate (IIA), (Z,E)-9, 11-tetradecadienyl acetate (III) and (Z,E)-9, 12-tetradecadienyl acetate (IV), and related compounds dispensed from polyethylene vials were used to bait water traps and funnel traps in lucerne fields in Crete. In comparison with the catches of males in traps baited with the primary component (III) alone, catches were increased by the addition of 1–100% of I in relation to the amounts of III, decreased by the addition of 5% or more of IIA and decreased by the addition of more than 5% of IV. The diene III was more attractive than any of the other three geometric isomers, although combining the Z,Z isomer (V) or the E,E isomer (VI) with III increased catches while the addition of the E,Z isomer (VII) decreased catches. The alcohols VIII and IX corresponding to the acetates III and IIA were not attractive but caused a marked reduction in trap catch when combined with III. The homologue of III (Z,E)-11-methyl–9, 11-tetradecadienyl acetate (X), was unattractive to males but increased trap catches when combined with III. 9-Tetradecynyl acetate (XI) exhibited neither attractant nor inhibitory activity, and similar results were obtained with ethyl cyclohexane carboxylate (XII) and 2-nonynal dimethyl acetal (XIII), compounds which have similar far-infrared spectra to that of diene III. The distributions of males landing on sticky board traps 70 cm in diameter baited with III or mixtures of III with I, IIA or IV showed that a greater percentage of the moths landed at the periphery of the traps baited with certain combinations of III with I and IV than on traps baited with III alone. Collection and analysis of the volatiles emitted by virgin females of different origins indicated that those from Crete produced I and III only, those from Israel produced I, III and IV, while those from Egypt produced I, III, IV and IIA and/or (E)-11-tetradecenyl acetate (IIB). The results are discussed in relation to previous work on S. littoralis and current theories on insect communication, and also in terms of their relevance to the practical field usage of pheromones in control of this pest.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , September 1980 , pp. 417 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aihara, Y & Shibuya, T. (1977). Responses of single olfactory receptor cells to sex pheromones in the tobacco cutworm moth, Spodoptera litura.—J. Insect Physiol. 23, 779–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. L, Hill, A. S & Roelofs, W. L. (1978). Seasonal variations in pheromone trap catches of male omnivorous leafroller moths, Platynota stultana.—Environ. Entomol. 7, 399–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bestmann, H. J., Suss, J & Vostrowsky, O. (1979). Pheromone XXVI. Synthese der Sexual-lockstoffe (E)-7,(Z)-9-Dodecadienylacetat, (E)-9,11-Dodecadienylacetat und (Z)-9,(E)-11-Tetradecadienylacetat.—Tetrahedron Lett. No. 26, 2467–2470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butenandt, A., Beckmann, R., Stamm, D & Hecker, E. (1959). Über den Sexuallockstoff des Seidenspinners Bombyx mori. Reindarstellung und Konstitution.—Z. Naturf. B. 14, 283–284.Google Scholar
Campion, D. G., Bettany, B. W., Nesbitt, B. F., Beevor, P. S., Lester, R & Poppi, R. G. (1974 a). Field studies of the female sex pheromone of the cotton leaf worm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) in Cyprus.—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion, D. G., Bettany, B. W & Steedman, R. A. (1974 b). The arrival of male moths of the cotton leaf-wormSpodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) at a new continuously recording pheromone trap.—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion, D. G.Bettany, B. W.Nesbitt, B. F.Beevor, P. S.Lester, R & Poppi, R. G. (1975).The synthetic sex-pheromone of Spodoptera littoralis Boisd. and its uses: a field evaluation.—pp. 593–609 in Sterility principle for insect control 1974. Proceedings of the symposium on the sterility principle for insect control jointly organized by the IAEA and the FAO of the United Nations and held in Innsbruck, 22–26 07 1974.—622 pp. Vienna, IAEA (STI/PUB/377).Google Scholar
Campion, D. G.Lester, R & Nesbitt, B. F. (1978). Controlled release of pheromones.—Pestic. Sci. 9, 434–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decodts, G.Dressaire, G & Langlois, Y. (1979). Pyridines as precursors of conjugated diene pheromones.—Synthesis. 510–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goto, G., Shima, T., Masuya, H., Masuoka, Y & Hiraga, K. (1975). A stereoselective synthesis of (Z,E)-9, 11-tetradecadienyl-1-acetate, a major component of the sex pheromone of Spodoptera litura.—Chem. Lett. 103–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grob, K & Zurcher, F. (1976). Stripping of organic trace substances from water. Equipment and procedure.—J. Chromat. 117, 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, D. R.Beevor, P. S.Lester, R.Poppi, R. G & Nesbitt, B. F. (1975). Synthesis of the major sex pheromone of the Egyptian cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.).—Chem. & Ind. no. 5, 216–217.Google Scholar
Henrick, C. A.Willy, W. E.Baum, J. W.Baer, T. A.Garcia, B. A.Mastre, T. A & Chang, S. M. (1975). Stereoselective synthesis of alkyl (2E, 4E)-and (2Z, 4E)-3,7,11-trimethyl-2,4-dodecadienoates. Insect growth regulators with juvenile hormone activity.—J. org. Chem. 40, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrick, C. A. (1977). The synthesis of insect sex pheromones.—Tetrahedron 33, 1845–1889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosny, M. M.Iss-Hak, R. R.Nasr EL Sayed, A.Critchley, B. R.Topper, C & Campion, D. G. (1979). Mass-trapping for the control of Egyptian cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis in Egypt.—pp. 395–400 in Proceedings of the 1979 British Crop Protection Conference—Pests and Diseases. Vol. 2, London, British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
Kaissling, K. E., Kasang, G.Bestmann, H. J.Stransky, W & Vostrowsky, O. (1978). A new pheromone of the silkworm moth Bombyx mori. Sensory pathway and behavioural effect.—Naturwissenschaften 65, 382–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehat, M.Greenberg, S & Tamaki, Y. (1976). Field evaluation of the synthetic sex pheromone, as an attractant for males of the cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.). in Israel.—Appl. Entomol. Zool. 11, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, R. (1978). Smectic liquid crystal for the gas-liquid chromatographic separation of lepidopterous sex pheromones and related isomeric olefins.—J. Chromat. 156, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, J. R.Tumlinson, J. H & Sharp, J. L. (1977). Absence of synergism in the response of Florida lesser peachtree borer males to synthetic sex pheromone.—Fla. Ent. 60, 27–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McVeigh, L. J.Paton, E. M & Hall, D. R. (1979). Factors affecting the performance of pheromone traps for male Spodoptera littoralis.—pp. 409–419 in Proceedings of the 1979 British Crop Protection Conference—Pests and Diseases. Vol. 2, London, British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
Murlis, J & Bettany, B. W. (1977). Night flight towards a sex pheromone source by male Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae).—Nature, Lond. 268, 433–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesbitt, B. F.Beevor, P. S.Cole, R. A.Lester, R & Poppi, R. G. (1973). Sex pheromones of two noctuid moths.—Nature New Biol. 244, 208–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesbitt, B. F.Beevor, P. S.Hall, D. R.Lester, R.Davies, J. C & Reddy, K. V. S. (1979). Components of the sex pheromone of the female spotted stalk borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): identification and preliminary field trials.—J. chem. Ecol. 5, 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumark, S.Jacobson, M & Teich, I. (1974). Field evaluation of the four synthetic components of the sex pheromone of Spodoptera littoralis and their improvement with an antioxidant.—Environ. Letters. 6, 219–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neumark, S.Waters, R. M.Jacobson, M & Teich, I. (1975). Improvement of the attractiveness of Spodoptera littoralis sex pheromone and its possible use in safety belts around cultivated areas to control the pest in Israel.—Environ. Letters 10, 97–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neumark, S.Waters, R. M.Jacobson, M & Teich, I. (1977). The relative attractiveness of several synthetic formulations of Spodoptera littoralis pheromone to male moths.—J. environ. Sci. Hlth A 12, 259–276.Google Scholar
Priesner, E. (1979). Specificity studies on pheromone receptors of noctuid and tortricid lepidoptera.—pp. 57–71 in Ritter, F. J. (Ed.). Chemical ecology: odour communication in animals.—427 pp. Amsterdam, Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press.Google Scholar
Read, J. S & Beevor, P. S. (1976). Analytical studies on the sex pheromone complex of Ephestia cautella (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae).—J. stored Prod. Res. 12, 55–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, W. L & Cardé, R. T. (1974). Oriental fruit moth and lesser appleworm attractant mixtures refined.—Environ. Entomol. 3, 586–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, W. L & Cardé, R. T. (1977). Responses of lepidoptera to synthetic sex pheromone chemicals and their analogues.—A. Rev. Ent. 22, 377–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, W. L. (1978). Threshold hypothesis for pheromone perception.—J. chem. Ecol. 4, 685–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, G. H. L & Minks, A. K. (1977). Some factors influencing the performance of pheromone traps for oriental fruit moth in Australia.—Entomologia exp. appl. 22, 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamaki, Y & Honma, K. (1976). Sex pheromone and reproductive isolation in Lepidoptera with special reference to Adoxophyes spp. in Japan.—pp. 13–22 in Proceedings of a symposium on insect pheromones and their applications. Nagaoka and Tokyo, 12 8–11, 1976.—176 pp. Tokyo, Japan Plant Protection Association.Google Scholar
Tamaki, Y.Noguchi, H & Yushima, T. (1973). Sex pheromone of Spodoptera litura (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): isolation, identification and synthesis.—Appl. Ent. Zool. 8, 200–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamaki, Y & Yushima, T. (1974 a). Sex pheromone of the cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis.—J. Insect Physiol. 20, 1005–1014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamaki, Y & Yushima, T. (1974 b). Biological activity of the synthesized sex pheromone and its geometrical isomers of Spodoptera litura (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).—Appl. Ent. Zool. 9, 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teich, I.Neumark, SJacobson, M.Klug, J.Shani, A & Waters, R. M. (1979). Mass trapping of males of Egyptian cotton leafworm (Spodoptera littoralis) and large-scale synthesis of Prodlure.—pp. 343–350 in Ritter, F. J. (Ed.) Chemical ecology: odour communication in animals.—427 pp. Amsterdam, Elsevier/North Holland Biochemical Press.Google Scholar
Wiltshire, E. P. (1977). Middle East Lepidoptera, XXXVII: notes on the Spodoptera litura (F.) group (Noctuidae—Trifinae).—Proc. Brit. ent. Nat. Hist. Soc. 10, 92–96.Google Scholar
Wright, R. H. (1966). Primary odors and insect attraction.—Can. Ent. 98, 1083–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yushima, T.Tamaki, YKamano, S & Oyama, M. (1974). Field evaluation of a synthetic sex pheromone, “litlure”, as an attractant for males of Spodoptera litura (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).—Appl. Ent. Zool. 9, 147–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar