Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:35:46.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Larval and female footprints as feeding deterrent cues for immature stages of two congeneric ladybird predators (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2014

B. Kumar ,
G. Mishra  and
Omkar
B. Kumar
Affiliation:
Centre of Excellence in Biocontrol of Insect Pests, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow 226 007, India
G. Mishra
Affiliation:
Centre of Excellence in Biocontrol of Insect Pests, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow 226 007, India
Omkar*
Affiliation:
Centre of Excellence in Biocontrol of Insect Pests, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow 226 007, India
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +91-9415757747 E-mail: omkaar55@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the present study predation parameters, i.e. consumption rate, conversion efficiency and growth rate, and total developmental duration of immature stages of two congeneric ladybirds, Coccinella septempunctata (L.) and Coccinella transversalis F., have been evaluated in presence of conspecific and heterospecific fourth instar larval and adult female tracks. We hypothesized that the semiochemicals within larval/adult female tracks might act as foraging/feeding deterrent pheromones (FDPs) and would reduce the predation parameters; and would prolong total developmental duration of ladybird predators. Results of the study positively affirmed our hypothesis. The deterrence in prey consumption and reduction in conversion efficiency and growth rate was density dependent with species-specific variations. Consumption rate, conversion efficiency, and growth rate of larval instars decreased and the total developmental duration of immature stages increased when exposed to an increasing density of zero, two, three, and four conspecific/heterospecific larval/adult female tracks. Between ladybird species, C. septempunctata had higher consumption rate, growth rate, and total developmental durations, whereas conversion efficiency was higher in C. transversalis. Despite the presence of semiochemical tracks as foraging barriers, early instars showed higher conversion efficiencies and growth rates, whereas fourth instars had highest consumption rate in all experimental treatments. The present study, therefore, suggests that semiochemical tracks significantly reduce the predation potential and prolong developmental duration of conspecifics and heterospecifics. They, thus behave as FDP.

Keywords

ladybirdssemiochemical tracksconsumption rateconversion efficiencygrowth rate
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 104 , Issue 5 , October 2014 , pp. 652 - 660
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlawat, D.S., Singh, H., Singh, D. & Rohilla, H.R. (2008) Predatory potential of ladybird beetle, Coccinella septempunctata L. on mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.). Journal of Oilseeds Research 25(1), 62–63.Google Scholar
Al Abassi, S., Birkett, M.A., Petterson, J., Pickett, J.A. & Woodcock, C.M. (1998) Ladybird beetle odour identified and found to be responsible for attraction between adults. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 54, 876–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almohamad, R., Verheggen, F.J., Francis, F. & Haubruge, E. (2010) Intraguild interactions between the predatory hoverfly Episyrphus balteatus (Diptera: Syrphidae) and the Asian ladybird, Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): effect of larval tracks. European Journal of Entomology 107, 41–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amat, I., Desouhant, E. & Carlos Bernstein, C. (2009) Differential use of conspecific-derived information by sexual and asexual parasitic wasps exploiting partially depleted host patches. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 63, 563–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, A.F.G. (2000) Insect Predator–Prey Dynamics: Ladybird Beetles and Biological Control. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doumbia, M., Hemptinne, J.L. & Dixon, A.F.G. (1998) Assessment of patch quality by ladybirds: role of larval tracks. Oecologia 113, 197–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrero, D., Lemon, J., Fluegge, D., Pashkovski, S., Korzan, W., Datta, S., Spehr, M., Fendt, M. & Liberles, S. (2011) Detection and avoidance of a carnivore odor by prey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108, 11235–11240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finlayson, C.J., Alyokhin, A.V., Gross, S. & Porter, E.W. (2010) Differential consumption of four aphid species by four lady beetle species. Insect Science 10, 31. doi: 10.1673/031.010.3 101.Google ScholarPubMed
Hemptinne, J.L. & Dixon, A.F.G. (2000) Defence, oviposition and sex: semiochemical parsimony in two species of ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)? A short review. European Journal Entomology 97, 443–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemptinne, J.L., Dixon, A.F.G. & Coffin, J. (1992) Attack strategy of ladybird beetles (Coccinellidae): factors shaping their numerical response. Oecologia 90, 238–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemptinne, J.L., Doumbia, M. & Dixon, A.F.G. (2000 a) Assessment of patch quality by ladybirds: role of aphid and plant phenology. Journal of Insect Behavior 13, 353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemptinne, J.L., Lognay, G., Gauthier, C. & Dixon, A.F.G. (2000 b) Role of surface chemical signals in egg cannibalism and intraguild predation in ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Chemoecology 10, 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemptinne, J.L., Lognay, G., Doumbia, M. & Dixon, A.F.G. (2001) Chemical nature and persistence of the oviposition deterring pheromone in the tracks of the two spot ladybird, Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Chemoecology 11, 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodek, I., van Emden, H.F. & Honek, A. (2012) Ecology and Behavior of the Ladybird Beetles (Coccinellidae). UK, Blackwell Publishing limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isikber, A.A. & Copland, M.J.W. (2001) Food consumption and utilization by larvae of two coccinellid predators, Scymnus levaillanti and Cycloneda sanguinea, on cotton aphid’, Aphis gossypii. BioControl 46, 455–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jalali, M.A., Tirry, L. & De Clercq, P. (2009) Food consumption and immature growth of Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on a natural prey and a factitious food. European Journal of Entomology 106, 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarosik, V., Honek, A., Magarey, R.D. & Skuhrovec, J. (2011) Developmental database for phenology models: related insect and mite species have similar thermal requirements. Journal of Economic Entomology 104(6), 1870–1876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kajita, Y., Yasuda, H. & Evans, E.W. (2006) Effects of native ladybirds on oviposition of the exotic species, Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), in Japan. Applied Entomology and Zoology 41, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, B., Bista, M., Mishra, G. & Omkar, (2014) Stage specific consumption and utilization of aphids, con-specific and hetero-specific eggs by two species of Coccinella (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 111(3), 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laubertie, E., Martini, X., Cadena, C., Treilhou, M., Dixon, A.F.G. & Hemptinne, J.L. (2006) The immediate source of the oviposition-deterring pheromone produced by larvae of Adalia bipunctata (L.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Journal of Insect Behaviour 19, 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, E., Demougeot, S., Vincent, C. & Coderre, D. (2004) Predation upon the oblique-banded leafroller, Choristoneura rosaceana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), by two aphidophagous coccinellids (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in the presence and absence of aphids. European Journal of Entomology 101, 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magro, A., Tene, J.N., Bastin, N., Dixon, A.F.G. & Hemptinne, J.L. (2007) Assessment of patch quality by ladybirds: relative response to conspecific and heterospecific larval tracks a consequence of habitat similarity? Chemoecology 17, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magro, A., Ducamp, C., Ramon-Portugal, F., Lecompte, E., Crouau-Roy, B., Dixon, A.F.G. & Hemptinne, J.L. (2010) Oviposition deterring infochemicals in ladybirds: the role of phylogeny. Evolutionary Ecology 24, 251–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marples, N.M., Brakefield, P.M. & Cowie, R.J. (1989) Differences between the 7-spot and 2-spot ladybird beetles (Coccinellidae) in their toxic effects on a bird predator. Ecological Entomology 14, 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martini, X., Haccou, P., Olivieri, I. & Hemptinne, J.L. (2009) Evolution of cannibalism and female's response to oviposition deterring pheromone in aphidophagous predators. Journal of Animal Ecology 78, 964–972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martini, X., Dixon, A.F.G. & Hemptinne, J.L. (2013) The effect of relatedness on the response of Adalia bipunctata L. to oviposition deterring cues. Bulletin of Entomological Research 103(1), 14–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meisner, M.H. & Ives, A.R. (2013) Foraging efficiency and the fitness consequences of spatial marking by ladybeetle larvae. Oikos 122, 1238–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisner, M.H., Harmon, J.P. & Anthony, R.I. (2011) Response of coccinellid larvae to conspecific and heterospecific larval tracks: a mechanism that reduces cannibalism and intraguild predation. Environmental Entomology 40, 103–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michaud, J.P. & Jyoti, J.L. (2007) Repellency of conspecific and heterospecific larval residues to Hippodamia convergens (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) ovipositing on sorghum plants. European Journal of Entomology 104, 399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, G. & Omkar, (2006) Conspecific interference by adults in an aphidophagous ladybird Propylea dissecta (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): effect on reproduction. Bulletin of Entomological Research 96, 407–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, G., Kumar, B., Shahid, M., Singh, D. & Omkar, (2011) Evaluation of four co-occurring ladybirds for use as biocontrol agents of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Homoptera: Aphididae). Biocontrol Science and Technology 21, 991–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, G., Singh, N., Shahid, M. & Omkar, (2012 a) Effect of presence and semiochemicals of conspecific stages on oviposition by ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 109, 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, G., Omkar, , Kumar, B. & Pandey, G. (2012 b) Stage and age specific predation in four aphidophagous ladybird beetles. Biocontrol Science and Technology 22, 463–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, G.M., Singh, N., Shahid, M. & Omkar, (2013) The effects of three sympatric ladybird species on oviposition by Menochilus sexmaculatus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Chemoecology 23(2), 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, S.E., Haynes, K.F. & Obrycki, J.J. (2010) Behavioral response to larval tracks and the influence of tracks on intraguild scavenging by coccinellid larvae. Journal of Insect Behavior 23, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakashima, Y. & Senoo, N. (2003) Avoidance of ladybird trails by an aphid parasitoid Aphidius ervi: active period and effects of prior oviposition experience. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 109, 163–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakashima, Y., Birkett, M.A., Pye, B.J., Pickett, J.A. & Powell, W. (2004) The role of semiochemicals in the avoidance of the seven-spot ladybird, Coccinella septempunctata, by the aphid parasitoid, Aphidius ervi. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30, 1103–1116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakashima, Y., Birkett, M.A., Pye, B.J. & Powell, W. (2006) Chemically mediated intraguild predator avoidance by aphid parasitoids: interspecific variability in sensitivity to semiochemical trails of ladybird predators. Journal of Chemical Ecology 32, 1989–1998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nufio, C.R. & Papaj, D.R. (2001) Host marking behavior in phytophagous insects and parasitoids. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 99, 273–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omkar, & Afaq, U. (2011) Food consumption, utilization and ecological efficiency of Parthenium beetle, Zygogramma bicolorata Pallister (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Asia Pacific Entomology 14(4), 393–397.Google Scholar
Omkar, & Pathak, S. (2009) Crowding affects the life attributes of an Aphidophagous ladybird beetle, Propylea dissecta. Bulletin of Insectology 62(1), 35–40.Google Scholar
Omkar, , Pervez, A. & Gupta, A.K. (2004) Role of surface chemicals in egg cannibalism and intraguild predation by neonates of two aphidophagous ladybirds, Propylea dissecta and Coccinella transversalis. Journal of Applied Entomology 128, 9–10.Google Scholar
Pasteels, J.M., Deroe, C., Tursch, B., Brakeman, J.C., Daloze, D. & Hootele, C. (1973) Distribution et activité des alcaloïdes défensifs des Coccinellidae. Journal of Insect Physiology 19, 1771–1784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rath, S.S. (2010) Food utilization efficiency in Antheraea mylitta fed on Terminalia arjuna leaves. Academic Journal of Entomology 3(1), 23–28.Google Scholar
Rieder, J.P., Newbold, T.A.S., Sato, S., Yasuda, H. & Evans, E.W. (2008) Intraguild predation and variation in egg defence between sympatric and allopatric populations of two species of ladybird beetles. Ecological Entomology 33, 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutledge, C.E., Eigenbrode, S.D. & Ding, H. (2008) A plant surface mutation mediates predator interference among ladybird larvae. Ecological Entomology 33, 464–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruzicka, Z. (1997) Recognition of oviposition-deterring allomones by aphidophagous predators (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae, Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 94, 431–434.Google Scholar
Ruzicka, Z. (2003) Perception of oviposition-deterring larval tracks in aphidophagous coccinellids Cycloneda limbifer and Ceratomegilla undecimnotata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 100, 345–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruzicka, Z. (2006) Oviposition-deterring effects of conspecific and heterospecific larval tracks on Cheilomenes sexmaculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 103, 757–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruzicka, Z. (2010) Detection of oviposition-deterring larval tracks in Chrysopa oculata and Chrysopa perla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). European Journal of Entomology 107, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruzicka, Z. & Zemek, R. (2008) Deterrent effects of larval tracks on conspecific larvae in Cycloneda limbifer. Biological Control 53, 763–771.Google Scholar
Schaller, M. & Nentwig, W. (2000) Olfactory orientation of the seven-spot ladybird beetle, Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): attraction of adults to plants and conspecific females. European Journal of Entomology 97, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swihart, R.K., Pignatello, J.J. & Mattina, M.J.I. (1991) Aversive responses of white-tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus, to predator urines. Journal of Chemical Ecology 17, 767–777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takizawa, T., Yasuda, H. & Agarwala, B.K. (2000) Effects of parasitized aphids as food on larval performance of three predatory ladybirds. Applied Entomology and Zoology 35, 467–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A.J., Muller, C.B. & Godfray, H.C.J. (1998) Effect of aphid predators on oviposition behaviour of aphid parasitoids. Journal of Insect Behavior 11, 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, R., Yguel, B. & Majerus, M. (2009) Effects of competition, cannibalism and intraguild predation on larval development of the European coccinellid Adalia bipunctata and the invasive species Harmonia axyridis. Ecological Entomology 34, 12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasuda, H., Takagi, T. & Kogi, K. (2000) Effects of conspecific and heterospecific larval tracks on the oviposition behaviour of the predatory ladybird, Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 97, 551–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar