Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:37:40.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrating biology into invasive species management is a key principle for eradication success: the case of yellow crazy ant Anoplolepis gracilipes in northern Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2014

B.D. Hoffmann
B.D. Hoffmann*
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Tropical Ecosystems Research Centre, PMB 44 Winnellie NT 0822, Australia
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +61 8 89448432 E-mail: Ben.Hoffmann@csiro.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The lack of biological knowledge of many invasive species remains as one of the greatest impediments to their management. Here I detail targeted research into the biology of the yellow crazy ant Anoplolepis gracilipes within northern Australia and detail how such knowledge can be used to improve the management outcomes for this species. I quantified nest location and density in three habitats, worker activity over 24 h, infestation expansion rate, seasonal variation of worker abundance and the timing of production of sexuals. Nests were predominantly (up to 68%) located at the bases of large trees, indicating that search efforts should focus around tree bases. Nest density was one nest per 22, 7.1 and 6.3 m2 in the three habitats, respectively. These data form the baselines for quantifying treatment efficacy and set sampling densities for post-treatment assessments. Most (60%) nests were underground, predominantly (89%) occurring in an open area rather than underneath a rock or log. Some seasonality was evident for nests within leaf litter, with most (83%) occurring during the ‘wet season’ (October–March). Of the underground nests, most were shallow, with 44% being less than 10 cm deep, and 67% being less than 20 cm deep. Such nest location and density information serves many management purposes, for improving detection, mapping and post-treatment assessments, and also provided strong evidence that carbohydrate supply was a major driver of A. gracilipes populations. Just over half of the nests (56%) contained queens. Of the 62 underground nests containing queens, most queens (80%) were located at the deepest chamber. When queens were present, most often (38%) only one queen was present, the most being 16. Queen number per nest was the lowest in July and August just prior to the emergence of virgin queens in September, with queen numbers then remaining steadily high until April. Nothing is known for any ant species about how the queen number per nest/colony affects treatment efficacy, but further research would no doubt yield important breakthroughs for treating ants. Activity occurred predominantly nocturnally, ceasing during mid-day. These activity data determined the critical threshold above which work must be conducted to be considered reliable, and also suggests that treatments are best applied in the afternoon. Total brood production peaked in February and was the lowest around August and September. These abundance data form the baselines for quantifying treatment efficacy, and may have implications for treatment efficacy. Males were found every month, predominantly between August and November. Queen pupae were found in September. The reproductive timing of sexuals determines the treatment schedule. Targeted, site-specific research such as that described here should be an integral part of any eradication program for invasive species to design knowledge-based treatment protocols and determine assessment benchmarks.

Keywords

invasioninvertebratephenologyreproductiontreatment
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 105 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 141 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, K.L. (2005) Supercolonies of the invasive yellow crazy ant, Anoplolepis gracilipes, on an oceanic island: forager activity patterns, density and biomass. Insectes Sociaux 52, 266–273.Google Scholar
Abdelkrim, J., Pascal, M., Calmet, C. & Samadi, S. (2005) Importance of assessing population genetic structure before eradication of invasive species: examples from insular Norway rat populations. Conservation Biology 19, 1509–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdelkrim, J., Pascal, M. & Samadi, S. (2007) Establishing causes of eradication failure based on genetics: case study of ship rat eradication in Ste. Anne Archipelago. Conservation Biology 21, 719–730.Google Scholar
Ansari, S. & Daehler, C.C. (2010) Life history variation in a temperate plant invader, Verbascum Thapsus along a tropical elevational gradient in Hawaii. Biological Invasions 12, 4033–4047.Google Scholar
Baker, G.L. (1976) The seasonal life cycle of Anoplolepis longipes (Jerdon) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a cacao plantation and under brushed rain forest in the northern district of Papua New Guinea. Insectes Sociaux 23, 253–262.Google Scholar
Bøhn, T., Sandlund, O.T., Amundsen, P. & Primicerio, R. (2004) Rapidly changing life history during invasion. Oikos 106, 138–150.Google Scholar
Bouwma, A. & Shoemaker, D. (2011) Wolbachia wSinvictaA infections in natural populations of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta: testing for phenotypic effects. Journal of Insect Science 11, 11.Google Scholar
Buckley, Y.M. (2008) The role of research for integrated management of invasive species, invaded landscapes and communities. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buczkowski, G. (2010) Extreme life history plasticity and the evolution of invasive characteristics in a native ant. Biological Invasions 12, 3343–3349.Google Scholar
Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-theoretic Approach. New York, USA, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Callcott, A.M.A., Porter, S.D., Weeks, R.D. Jr., Graham, L.C.F., Johnson, S.J. & Gilbert, L.E. (2011) Fire ant decapitating fly cooperative release programs (1994–2008): two Pseudacteon species, P. tricuspis and P. curvatus rapidly expand across imported fire ant populations in the southeastern United States. Journal of Insect Science 11, 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, K. & Donlan, C.J. (2005) Feral goat eradications on islands. Conservation Biology 19, 1362–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D.W., Cook, S.C., Snelling, R.R. & Chua, T.H. (2003) Explaining the abundance of ants in lowland tropical rainforest canopies. Science 300, 969–972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esler, K.J., Prozesky, H., Sharma, G.P. & McGeoch, M. (2010) How wide is the “knowing-doing” gap in invasion biology? Biological Invasions 12, 4065–4075.Google Scholar
Espadeler, X., Rey, S. & Bernal, V. (2004) Queen number in a supercolony of the invasive garden ant, Lasius neglectus . Insectes Sociaux 51, 232–238.Google Scholar
Greenslade, P.J.M. (1971) Phenology of three ant species in the Solomon Islands. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 10, 241–252.Google Scholar
Gross, K.L. & Werner, P.A. (1978) The biology of Canadian weeds Verbascum Thapsus L. and V. blattaria L. Canadian Journal of Botany 58, 401–413.Google Scholar
Haines, I.H. & Haines, J.B. (1978) Colony structure, seasonality and food requirements of the crazy ant, Anoplolepis longipes (Jerd.), in the Seychelles. Ecological Entomology 3, 109–118.Google Scholar
Hauser, C.E. & Possingham, H.P. (2008) Experimental or precautionary? Adaptive management over a range of time horizons. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 72–81.Google Scholar
Heller, N.E. (2004) Colony structure in introduced and native populations of the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile . Insectes Sociaux 51, 378–386.Google Scholar
Heller, N.E. & Gordon, D.M. (2006) Seasonal spatial dynamics and causes of nest movement in colonies of the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile). Ecological Entomology 31, 499–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, N.E., Sanders, N.J. & Gordon, D.M. (2006). Linking temporal and spatial scales in the study of an Argentine ant invasion. Biological Invasions 8, 501–507.Google Scholar
Heller, N.E., Ingram, K.K. & Gordon, D.M. (2008) Nest connectivity and colony structure in unicolonial Argentine ants. Insectes Sociaux 55, 397–403.Google Scholar
Helms, K.R. & Vinson, B. (2008) Plant resources and colony growth in an invasive ant: the importance of honeydew-producing hemiptera in carbohydrate transfer across trophic levels. Environmental Entomology 37, 487–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, B.D. (2010) Yellow crazy ant, Anoplolepis gracilipes, eradications in NE Arnhem Land. Ecological Management and Restoration 11, 82–83.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, B.D. & Abbott, K.L. (2010) Active adaptive management for invasive ant management. pp. 297–298 in Lach, L., Parr, C.L. & Abbott, K.L. (Eds) Ant Ecology. New York, NY, USA, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, B.D. & Saul, W.C. (2010). Yellow crazy ant (Anoplolepis gracilipes) invasions within undisturbed mainland Australian habitats: no support for biotic resistance hypothesis. Biological Invasions 12, 3093–3108.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, B.D., Abbott, K. L. & Davis, P. (2010) Invasive ant management. pp. 287–304 in Lach, L., Parr, C.L. & Abbott, K.L. (Eds) Ant Ecology. New York, NY, USA, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, B., Davis, P., Gott, K., Jennings, C., Joe, S., Krushelnycky, P., Miller, R., Webb, G. & Widmer, M. (2011) Improving ant eradications: details of more successes, a global synthesis, and recommendations. Aliens 31, 16–23.Google Scholar
Holway, D.A., Lach, L., Suarez, A.V., Tsutsui, N.D. & Case, T.J. (2002) The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33, 181–233.Google Scholar
Howald, G., Donlan, C.J., Galván, J.P., Russell, J.C., Parkes, J., Samaniego, A., Wang, Y., Veitch, C.R., Genovesi, P., Pascal, M., Saunders, A. & Tershy, B. (2007) Invasive rodent eradication on islands. Conservation Biology 21, 1258–1268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingram, K.K. (2002) Plasticity in queen number and social structure in the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile). Evolution 56, 2008–2016.Google Scholar
Kay, A.D., Zumbusch, T., Heinen, J.L., Marsh, T.C. & Holway, D.A. (2010) Nutrition and interference competition have interactive effects on the behaviour and performance in Argentine ants. Ecology 91, 57–64.Google Scholar
Kelehear, C., Brown, G.P. & Shine, R. (2012) Rapid evolution of parasite life history traits on an expanding range-edge. Ecology Letters 15, 329–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, R.N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W.M., Evans, H., Clout, M. & Bazzaz, F.A. (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10, 689–710.Google Scholar
Myers, J.H., Simberloff, D., Kuris, A.M. & Carey, J.R. (2000) Eradication revisited: dealing with exotic species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15, 316–320.Google Scholar
O'Dowd, D.J., Green, P.T. & Lake, P.S. (2003) Invasional ‘meltdown’ on an oceanic island. Ecology Letters 6, 812–817.Google Scholar
Oliver, T.H., Pettitt, T., Leather, S.R. & Cook, J.M. (2008) Numerical abundance of invasive ants and monopolisation of exudate-producing resources – a chicken and egg situation. Insect Conservation and Diversity 1, 208–214.Google Scholar
Oppel, S., Beaven, B.M., Bolton, M., Vickery, J. & Bodey, T.W. (2010) Eradication of invasive mammals on islands inhabited by humans and domestic animals. Conservation Biology 25, 232–240.Google Scholar
Orivel, J., Grangier, J., Foucaud, J., Le Breton, J., Andrès, F.X., Jourdan, H., Delabie, J.H.C., Fournier, D., Cerdan, P., Facon, B., Estoup, A. & Dejean, A. (2009) Ecologically heterogeneous populations of the invasive ant Wasmannia auropunctata within its native and introduced ranges. Ecological Entomology 34, 504–512.Google Scholar
Pascal, M., Brithmer, R., Lorvelec, O. & Vénumière, N. (2004) Conséquences sur l'avifaune nicheuse de la réserve naturelle des îlets de Sainte-Anne (Martinique) de la récente invasion du rat noir (Rattus rattus), établies à l'issue d'une tentative d'éradication. Revue d'Écologie (Terre and Vie) 59, 309–318.Google Scholar
Rao, N.S. & Veeresh, G.K. (1991) Nesting and foraging habits of Crazy ant Anoplolepis longipes (Jeredon) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Environment and Ecology 9, 670–677.Google Scholar
Rao, N.S. & Veeresh, G.K. (1994) Bio-ecology and management of crazy ant Anoplolepis longipes (Jerdon) – A review. Agricultural Reviews 15, 182–194.Google Scholar
Rao, N.S., Veeresh, G.K. & Viraktamath, A.C. (1991) Dispersal and spread of Crazy ant Anoplolepis longipes (Jeredon) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). 9, 682–686.Google Scholar
Raven, P.H. & Johnson, G.B. (1992) Biology. Missouri, Mosby-Year Book.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online at http://www.R-project.org Google Scholar
Richardson, D.M. & Pyšek, P. (2008) Fifty years of invasion ecology – the legacy of Charles Elton. Diversity and Distributions 14, 161–168.Google Scholar
Rowles, A.D. & Silverman, J. (2009) Carbohydrate supply limits invasion of natural communities by Argentine ants. Oecologia 161, 161–171.Google Scholar
Russell-Smith, J. (1991) Classification, species richness, and environmental relations of monsoon rain forest in northern Australia. Journal of Vegetation Science 2, 259–278.Google Scholar
Savage, A.M., Rudgers, J.A. & Whitney, K.D. (2009) Elevated dominance of extrafloral nectary-bearing plants is associated with increased abundances of an invasive ant and reduced native ant richness. Diversity and Distributions 15, 751–761.Google Scholar
Silverman, J. & Brightwell, R.J. (2008). The Argentine ant: challenges in managing an invasive unicolonial pest. Annual Review of Entomology 53, 231–252.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. (2003) How much information on population biology is needed to manage introduced species? Conservation Biology 17, 83–92.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. (2009) We can eliminate invasions or live with them: successful management projects. Biological Invasions 11, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tindo, M., Masse, P.S.M., Kenne, M., Mony, R., Orivel, J., Fotio, A.S., Kuaté, A.F., Djiéto-Lordon, C., Fomena, A., Estoup, A., Dejean, A. & Foucaud, J. (2012) Current distribution and population dynamics of the little fire ant supercolony in Cameroon. Insectes Sociaux 59, 175–182.Google Scholar
Tschinkel, W.R. (2006) The Fire Ants. Cambridge, England, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vanderwoude, C., Onuma, K. & Reimer, N. (2010) Eradicating Wasmannia auropunctata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Maui, Hawaii: the use of combination treatments to control an arboreal invasive ant. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 42, 23–31.Google Scholar
Veeresh, G.K. (1987) Pest status of crazy ant Anoplolepis longipes (Jerdon) in Karnataka, India, and causes for its outbreak. pp. 667–668 in Eder, J. & Rembold, H. (Eds) Chemistry and Biology of Social Insects. Munich, Peperny.Google Scholar
Veitch, C.R., Clout, M.N. & Towns, D.R. (Eds) (2011) Island Invasives: Eradication and Management. Gland, Switzerland, IUCN.Google Scholar
Walters, C.J. & Holling, C.S. (1990) Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71, 2060–2068.Google Scholar
Wilder, S.M., Holway, D.A., Suarez, A.V., LeBrun, E.G. & Eubanks, M.D. (2011) Intercontinental differences in resource use reveal the importance of mutualisms in fire ant invasions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 20639–20644.Google Scholar
Williams, D.F., Collins, H.L. & Oi, D.H. (2001) The Red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): an historical perspective of treatment programs and the development of chemical baits for control. American Entomologist 47, 146–159.Google Scholar
Williams, R.J., Duff, G.A., Bowman, D.M.J.S. & Cook, G.D. (1996) Variation in the composition and structure of tropical savannas as a function of rainfall and soil texture along a large scale climatic gradient in the Northern Territory, Australia. Journal of Biogeography 3, 747–756.Google Scholar
Young, G.R. (1996) The crazy ant, Anoplolepis longipes (Jerdon)(Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on coconut palms in New Guinea. Papua New Guinea Journal of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 39, 10–13.Google Scholar