Skip to main content Accessibility help

Differential response to oviposition site by feral and domestic populations of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae)

  • Sister M. G. Leahy (a1), R. C. VandeHey (a1) and K. S. Booth (a1)


Low fecundity in the laboratory was found in populations of Aedes aegypti (L.) exhibiting Black tergite (Bt), a phenotype characteristic of the feral A. a. formosus (Wlk), whereas high fecundity was found in six domestic populations of A. a. aegyptiin which the phenotype was absent. An investigation of the cause of low oviposition by the feral population indicated that behavioural differences in mating and feeding were not responsible; egg retention was identified as the major factor. Introduction into laboratory procedure of a variable simulating the feral environment, i.e., coconut-shell infusion at the oviposition site, induced a highly significant increase in feral fecundity both through its chemical constituents and visual attraction. Differential response to oviposition site is discussed in relation to the evolution of subspecies of A. aegypti.



Hide All
Bond, H. A. & Fay, R. W. (1969). Factors influencing Aedes aegypti occurrence in containers.—Mosquito News 29, 113116.
Craig, G. B. Jr. & Vandehey, R. (1962). Genetic variability in Aedes aegypti (Diptera, Culicidae). I. Mutations affecting color pattern.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 55, 4758.
Crovello, T. J. & Hacker, C. (1972). Evolutionary strategies in life table characteristics among feral and urban strains of Aedes aegypti (L.).—Evolution, Lancaster, Pa 26, 185196.
Garnham, P. C. C., Harper, J. O. & Highton, R. B. (1946). The mosquitoes of the Kaimosi Forest, Kenya Colony, with special reference to yellow fever.—Bull. ent. Res. 36, 473496.
Gillett, J. D. (1955). Variation in the hatching-response of Aedes eggs (Diptera, Culicidae). —Bull. ent. Res. 46, 241265.
Gouck, H. D. (1972). Host preferences of various strains of Aedes aegypti and A. simpsoni as determined by an olfactometer.—Bull. Wld Hith Org. 47, 680683.
Haddow, A. J. (1945). On the mosquitoes of Bwamba county, Uganda. I: Description of Bwamba, with special reference to mosquito ecology.—Proc. zooi. Soc. Lond. 115, 113.
Haddow, A. J. (1948). The mosquitoes of Bwarnba County, Uganda. VI: Mosquito breeding in plant axils.—Bull. ent. Res. 39, 185212.
Hartberg, W. K. & Craig, G. B. Jr. (1968). Reproductive isolation in Stegomyia mosquitoes. I. Sexual isolation between Aedes aegypti and A. mascarensis.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61, 865870.
Hazard, E. I., Mayer, M. S. & Savage, K. E. (1967). Attraction and oviposition stimulation of gravid female mosquitoes by bacteria isolated from hay infusions.—Mosquito News 27, 133136.
Kennedy, J. S. (1942). On water-finding and oviposition by captive mosquitoes.—Bull. ent. Res. 32, 279301.
Kilama, W. L. & Craig, G. B. Jr. (1969). Monofactorial inheritance of susceptibility to Plasmodium gallinaceum in Aedes aegypti.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 63, 419432.
Leahy, M. G. (1962). Barriers to hybridization between Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera, Culicidae).—Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Notre Dame, USA.
Machado-Allison, C. E. (1971). Genetic differences among subspecies of Aedes aegypti (L.) and their evolutionary implications.—Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Notre Dame, USA.
Machado-Allison, C. E. & Craig, G. B. Jr. (1972). Geographic variation in resistance to dessication in Aedes aegypti and A. atropalpus (Diptera, Culicidae).—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65, 542547.
Manefield, T. (1951). Investigations of the preference shown by Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (L.) and Culex (Culex) fatigans Wied. for specific types of breeding water.—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 76, 149154.
Mathis, M. (1934). Agressivité et ponte comparées du moustique de Ia fièvre jaune en conditions expérimentales.—C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 115, 16241626.
Mattingly, P. F. (1957). Genetical aspects of the Aedes aegypti problem. 1. Taxonomy and bionomics.—Ann. trop Med. Parasit. 51, 392408.
McClelland, G. A. H. (1960). A preliminary study of the genetics of abdominal colour variations in Aedes aegypti (L) (Diptera, Culicidae)Ann. trop. Med. Parosit. 54, 305320.
McClelland, G. A. H. (1974). A worldwide survey of variation in scale pattern of the abdominal tergum of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera, Culicidae).—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 126, 239259.
O’Gower, A. K. (1963). Environmental stimuli and the oviposition behavior of Aedes aegypti var. queenslandis Theobald (Diptera, Culicidae).Anim. Behav. 11, 189197.
Petersen, J. L. (1977). Behavioral differences in two subspecies of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera, Culicidae) in East Africa.—Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Notre Dame, USA.
Rodriquez, P. H. & Craig, G. B. Jr. (1973). Susceptibility to Brugia pahangi in geographic strains of Aedes aegypti.—Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 22, 5361.
Schoenig, E. (1967). Strain variation in behaviour in Aedes aegypti (Diptera, Culicidae).— Philipp. Scient. (Ser. F) 4, 5582.
Scott, J. A. & McClelland, G. A. H. (1975). Electrophoretic differences between sympatric ecotypes.—Nature, Lond. 256, 405406.
Snow, W. F. (1971). The spectral sensitivity of Aedes aegypti (L) at oviposition.—Bull. ent. Res. 60, 683696.
Spielman, A., Leahy, M. G. & Skaff, V. (1967). Seminal loss in repeatedly mated female Aedes aegypti.—Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 132, 404412.
Trpis, M & Hausermann, W. (1975). Demonstration of differential domesticity of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera, Culicidae) in Africa by mark-release-recapture.—Bull. ent. Res. 65, 199208.
VandeHey, R. C., Leahy, M. G. & Booth, K. S. (1978). Analysis of colour variations in feral, peridomestic and domestic populations of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). —Bull. ent. Res. 68, 443453.
Wallis, R. C. (1954). A study of oviposition activity of mosquitoes.—Am. J. Hyg. 60, 135168.
Woke, P. A. (1937). Comparative effects of the blood of different species of vertebrates on egg production of Aedes aegypti Linn.—Am. J. trop. Med. 17, 729745.

Differential response to oviposition site by feral and domestic populations of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae)

  • Sister M. G. Leahy (a1), R. C. VandeHey (a1) and K. S. Booth (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed