Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:09:19.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in the recovery of insects in pitfall traps associated with the age of cow dung bait fresh or frozen at the time of placement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2020

G.A. Bezanson Open the ORCID record for G.A. Bezanson [Opens in a new window] ,
C.D. Dovell  and
K.D. Floate Open the ORCID record for K.D. Floate [Opens in a new window]
G.A. Bezanson
Affiliation:
Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 5403 1st Avenue S., Lethbridge, ABT1J 4B1, Canada Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive W., Lethbridge, ABT1K 3M4, Canada
C.D. Dovell
Affiliation:
Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 5403 1st Avenue S., Lethbridge, ABT1J 4B1, Canada Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive W., Lethbridge, ABT1K 3M4, Canada
K.D. Floate*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive W., Lethbridge, ABT1K 3M4, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: K.D. Floate, Email: Kevin.Floate@canada.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pitfall traps baited with cattle dung are commonly used to characterize local assemblages of coprophilous insects. Baits can be made fresh or be prepared in advance and kept frozen until needed. Insect recoveries are expected to decline with the age of the bait and may be affected by the use of fresh vs. frozen baits. To assess the effect of these two factors on insect recoveries, we performed a pitfall trap experiment that was repeated in four trials spanning 2 years and two locations in southern Alberta, Canada. The experimental design allowed us to minimize the potential confounding effect of short-term weather events. For results combined across trials, baits aged >3 days were largely ineffective for attracting coprophilous species. Frozen baits attracted significantly more insects than did fresh dung for the first 3 days after placement in the field with no difference thereafter. Our findings suggest that insect recoveries in dung-baited pitfall traps can be maximized with the use of frozen baits with replacement every 3–4 days.

Keywords

Communitycoprophilousdiversity
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 111 , Issue 3 , June 2021 , pp. 340 - 347
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-food, (2020). Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aruchunnan, G, Foo, NY, Ling, WS and Hazmi, IR (2015) Diversity and abundance of dung beetles attracted to different ages of cow dung at Tasik Chini Biosphere Reserve, Pahang. AIP Conference Proceedings 1678, 020005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbero, E, Palestrini, C and Rolando, A (1999) Dung beetle conservation: effects of habitat and resource selection (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea). Journal of Insect Conservation 3, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertone, M, Green, J, Washburn, S, Poore, M, Sorenson, C and Watson, DW (2005) Seasonal activity and species composition of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae and Geotrupidae) inhabiting cattle pastures in North Carolina. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 98, 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezanson, GA (2019) Assessing the effect of habitat, location and bait treatment on dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) diversity in southern Alberta, Canada. MSc, University of Lethbridge Lethbridge, Alberta.Google Scholar
Bezanson, GA and Floate, KD (2020) Use of wet, air-dried or oven-dried bulk mass to quantify insect numbers: an assessment with Chilothorax distinctus (Müller) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). The Canadian Entomologist 152, 261–268.Google Scholar
Brousseau, PM, Cloutier, C and Hébert, C (2010) Selected beetle assemblages captured in pitfall traps baited with deer dung or meat in balsam fir and sugar maple forests of central Quebec. Environmental Entomology 39, 1151–1158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, A (1984) Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 11, 265–270.Google Scholar
Dormont, L, Jay-Robert, P, Bessiere, JM, Rapior, S and Lumaret, J-P (2010) Innate olfactory preferences in dung beetles. Journal of Experimental Biology 213, 3177–3186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Errouissi, F, Haloti, S, Jay-Robert, P, Janati-idrissi, A and Lumaret, J-P (2004) Effects of the attractiveness for dung beetles of dung pat origin and size along a climatic gradient. Environmental Entomology 33, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiene, JG, Connior, MB, Androw, R, Baldwin, B and McKay, T (2011) Surveys of Arkansas dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae and Geotrupidae): phenologies, mass occurrences, state and distributional records. The American Midland Naturalist 165, 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincher, GT, Stewart, TB and Davis, R (1970) Attraction of coprophagous beetles to feces of various animals. Journal of Parasitology 56, 378–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, JA and Giller, PS (2002) Experimental investigations of colonisation by north temperate dung beetles of different types of domestic herbivore dung. Applied Soil Ecology 20, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flechtmann, CAH, Tabet, VG and Quintero, I (2009) Influence of carrion smell and rebaiting time on the efficiency of pitfall traps to dung beetle sampling. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 132, 211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floate, KD (1998) Does a repellent effect contribute to reduced levels of insect activity in dung from cattle treated with ivermectin. Bulletin of Entomological Research 88, 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floate, KD (2007) Endectocide residues affect insect attraction to dung from treated cattle: implications for toxicity tests. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 21, 312–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floate, KD and Gill, BD (1998) Seasonal activity of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) associated with cattle dung in southern Alberta and their geographic distribution in Canada. The Canadian Entomologist 130, 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floate, KD, Bouchard, P, Holroyd, G, Poulin, R and Wellicome, TI (2008) Does doramectin use on cattle indirectly affect the endangered burrowing owl? Rangeland Ecology & Management 61, 543–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goñi, B, Remedios, M, González-Vainer, P, Martínez, M and Vilela, CR (2012) Species of Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) attracted to dung and carrion baited pitfall traps in the Uruguayan Eastern Serranías. Zoologia (Curitiba) 29, 308–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howden, HF and Nealis, VG (1975) Effects of clearing in a tropical rain forest on the composition of the coprophagous scarab beetle fauna (Coleoptera). Biotropica 7, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jochmann, R and Blanckenhorn, WU (2016) Non-target effects of ivermectin on trophic groups of the cow dung insect community replicated across an agricultural landscape. Basic and Applied Ecology 17, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadiri, N, Lumaret, J-P and Floate, KD (2014) Functional diversity and seasonal activity of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) on native grasslands in southern Alberta, Canada. The Canadian Entomologist 146, 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, TH and Forsyth, A (2005) Trap spacing and transect design for dung beetle biodiversity studies. Biotropica 37, 322–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louzada, JNC and Silva, P (2009) Utilisation of introduced Brazilian pastures ecosystems by native dung beetles: diversity patterns and resource use. Insect Conservation and Diversity 2, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lysyk, TJ, Easton, ER and Evenson, PD (1985) Seasonal changes in nitrogen and moisture content of cattle manure in cool-season pastures. Journal of Range Management 38, 251–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, CJ, Louzada, J, Beiroz, W and Ewers, RM (2013) Optimising bait for pitfall trapping of Amazonian dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae). PLoS ONE 8, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pecenka, JR and Lundgren, JG (2018) The importance of dung beetles and arthropod communities on degradation of cattle dung pats in eastern South Dakota. PeerJ 6, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pimsler, M (2007) A survey of the dung beetles in cattle manure on pastures of an organic and a conventional dairy farm in New York state. (Undergraduate Thesis), Cornell University Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Price, DL (2004) Species diversity and seasonal abundance of scarabaeoid dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Geotrupidae and Trogidae) attracted to cow dung in central New Jersey. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 112, 334–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, DL, Brenneman, LM and Johnston, RE (2012) Dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae and Geotrupidae) communities of eastern Maryland. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 114, 142–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rentz, E and Price, DL (2016) Species diversity and succession of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Geotrupidae and Scarabaeidae) attracted to horse dung on Assateague Island. The Coleopterists Bulletin 70, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rounds, RJ and Floate, KD (2012) Diversity and seasonal phenology of coprophagous beetles at Lake City, Michigan, USA, with a new state record for Onthophagus taurus (Schreber) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin 66, 169–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabu, TK, Vinod, KV and Vineesh, PJ (2006) Guild structure, diversity and succession of dung beetles associated with Indian elephant dung in South Western Ghats forests. Journal of Insect Science 6, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simons, P, Molina, M, Hagadorn, MA and Price, DL (2018) Monitoring of dung beetle (Scarabaeidae and Geotrupidae) activity along Maryland's coastal plain. Northeastern Naturalist 25, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiberg, K and Floate, KD (2011) Where went the dung-breeding insects of the American bison? The Canadian Entomologist 143, 470–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viegas, G, Stenert, C, Schulz, UH and Maltchik, L (2014) Dung beetle communities as biological indicators of riparian forest widths in southern Brazil. Ecological Indicators 36, 703–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, L, Beaumont, DJ, Nager, RG and McCracken, DI (2007) Effects of avermectin residues in cattle dung on yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Scathophagidae) populations in grazed pastures. Bulletin of Entomological Research 97, 129–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WMO (2003) World Meteorological Organization. Manual on the Global Observing System, Geneva: WMO. Available at https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/OSY/Manual/WMO544.pdf (downloaded November 25, 2019).Google Scholar
Wurmitzer, C, Blüthgen, N, Krell, F-T, Maldonado, B, Ocampo, F, Müller, JK and Schmitt, T (2017) Attraction of dung beetles to herbivore dung and synthetic compounds in a comparative field study. Chemoecology 27, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bezanson et al. supplementary material

Figure S2

Download Bezanson et al. supplementary material(File)
File 598.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Bezanson et al. supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Bezanson et al. supplementary material(File)
File 2.9 MB