Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T14:53:57.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attraction of Aedes aegypti (L.): responses to human arms, carbon dioxide, and air currents in a new type of olfactometer1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. S. Mayer  and
J. D. James
M. S. Mayer
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Division, Agr. Res. Serv., U.S.D.A., Gainesville, Fla. 32601
J. D. James
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Division, Agr. Res. Serv., U.S.D.A., Gainesville, Fla. 32601
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A new type of olfactometer was designed to study the responses of mosquitos to various stimuli. Hosts could be displayed downwind as well as upwind from the mosquitos, and two hosts could be displayed simultaneously, one upwind from the other. Responses to radiations, if any, and to odours could be measured.

Mosquitos were not attracted downwind to an arm displayed within 61 cm., even when they were stimulated by CO2 (under an incident illumination of about 10 foot-candles). About half the mosquitos showed a positive anemotactic response (i.e., they left the end downwind compartment in which they were released) in a current of room air, which undoubtedly contained human emanations. Only 15 per cent, responded to filtered air. Carbon dioxide caused no increase in response to filtered air but increased the number responding to room air (76 per cent, left the end down-wind compartment). Equal numbers of mosquitos responded to an arm displayed upwind in room air and in filtered air, i.e., about 83 per cent, left the end compartment. Carbon dioxide caused no increase in the number of mosquitos responding to an arm but increased the number responding to attenuated emanations from an arm. A repellent (deet) eliminated most of the response to an arm; the addition of carbon dioxide increased upwind flight to the treated arm, but many of the mosquitos flew past it. Carbon dioxide therefore appears to have a synergistic action with arm odours in the attraction of females of Aedes aegypti (L.). However, this conclusion does not exclude other behavioural effects of carbon dioxide demonstrated by other investigators.

Eesponses to arms in this new type of olfactometer were nearly identical to those obtained in another type previously used in a large-scale study. The testing confirmed earlier reports that mosquitos do not fly far in the same direction as wind-current and that host location was not possible through positive anemotaxis in the absence of light. Mosquitos were not attracted to a source of infra-red radiation.

The new direct method of comparing the attractiveness of different subjects demonstrated that mosquitos would leave the vicinity of one arm and migrate further upwind to another that was more attractive. Water and acetone rinses of human arms reduced attraction; acetone appeared to be a better solvent for the attractant substance than water.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , February 1969 , pp. 629 - 642
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, A. W. A. (1951). Studies of the responses of the female Aëdes mosquito. Part IV. Field experiments on the Canadian species.—Bull. ent. Res. 42 pp. 575–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. W. A. (1966). The attraction of mosquitoes to hosts.—J. Am. Med. Ass. 196 pp. 159–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, A. W. A. Sarkaria, D. S. & Thompson, R. P. (1951). Studies on the responses of the female Aëdes mosquito. Part I.—The search for attractant vapours.—Bull. ent. Res. 42 pp. 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, P. S. (1966). Are arthropods infra-red and microwave detectors?.—Proc. N. Cent. Brch. ent. Soc. Am. 20 (1965) pp. 20–31.Google Scholar
Callahan, P. S. (1967). Insect molecular bioelectronics: a theoretical and experimental study of insect sensillae as tubular waveguides, with particular emphasis on their dielectric and thermoelectret properties.—Misc. Publ. ent. Soc. Am. 5 pp. 315–347.Google Scholar
Daykin, P. N., Kellogg, F. E. & Wright, R. H. (1965). Host-finding and repulation of Aedes aegypti—Can. Ent. 97 pp. 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derksen, W., Delhery, G. & Monahan, T. I. (1955). Final research report on reflectance and absorptance of human skin. Lab. Project 5046–3 Part 54. Armed Services Technical Information Agency AD-62854, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Dethier, V. G., Browne, L. B. & Smith, C. N. (1960). The designation of chemicals in terms of the responses they elicit from insects.—J. econ. Ent. 53 pp. 134–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, I. H., Gouck, H. K. & Smith, N. (1966). Attractiveness of men and women to Aedes aegypti and relative protection time obtained with deet.—Fla Ent. 49 pp. 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouck, H. K & Schreck, C. E. (1965). An olfactometer for use in the study of mosquito attractants.—J. econ. Ent. 58 pp. 589–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, J. D., Hammel, H. T & Murgatroyd, D. (1956). Spectral transmittance and reflectance of excited human skin.—J. appl. Physiol. 9 pp. 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalmus, H. & Hocking, B. (1960). Behaviour of Aedes mosquitoes in relation to blood-feeding and repellents.—Entomologia exp. appl. 3 pp. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, W. C. & Pittman Jr, J. C. (1966). Quantitative radiometric measurement of skin temperature.—J. appl. Physiol. 21 pp. 302–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, J. S. (1940). The visual responses of flying mosquitoes.—Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. (A) 109 pp. 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, A. A. (1965). Effects of repellents on mosquito behaviour.—Quaest. ent. 1 pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
Lindauer, M. (1960). Time-compensated sun orientation in bees.—Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 25 pp. 371–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Low, M. J. D. (1966). Infrared emission spectra of in vivo human skin.—Experientia 22 pp. 262–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Thiel, P. H. (1947). Attraction exercée sur Anopheles maculipennis atroparvus par l’acide carbonique dans un olfactomètre.—Acta trop. 4 pp. 10–20.Google Scholar
Willis, E. R. (1947). The olfactory response of female mosquitoes.—J. econ. Ent. 40 pp. 769–778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, R. H. (1962). The attraction and repulsion of mosquitoes.—Wld Rev. Pest Control 1 no. 4 pp. 20–30.Google Scholar