Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T13:38:00.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aircraft applications of insecticides in East Africa. XV.—Very-low-volume treatment of a seed-bean crop with DDT in oil solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

G. F. Burnett
Affiliation:
Tropical Pesticides Research Institute, Arusha, Tanzania
C. W. Lee
Affiliation:
Tropical Pesticides Research Institute, Arusha, Tanzania
P. O. Park
Affiliation:
Tropical Pesticides Research Institute, Arusha, Tanzania

Extract

Experiments are described on the aerial application of very low volumes (0·5 gal./acre) of oil solutions of DDT to control two pests, Heliothis armigera (Hb.) (bollworm) and Acanthomia horrida (Germ.) (brown bug), of the seed-bean crop in northern Tanzania. The method was compared with an improved variant of the standard commercial method of aerial control, in which DDT emulsion is applied at 1·85 gal./acre. This improved variant was also compared with a standard commercial treatment. Very-low-volume (solution) treatments were made with rotary atomisers, normal volume (emulsion) treatments with boom-and-nozzle equipment. The results were assessed, by measuring the amount of DDT deposited on filter papers and on the leaves of the crop and by estimating pest mortality from counts made immediately before and 48 hours after spraying.

A direct comparison of very-low- and normal-volume treatments under identical conditions was not possible, but it was established that under similar conditions the proportion of DDT emitted that was deposited at crop level (percentage recovery) was much the same for the two methods, varying between 41 and 62 per cent, according to conditions. The lower leaves of a fairly young crop of an open variety received about 60 per cent, of the deposit on the upper leaves, but in a mature crop of a tall dense variety this percentage fell to 35.

Standard commercial practice, with the aircraft flying very close to the crop, gave a recovery of about 55 per cent, in moderately good conditions but with a variation in deposit density across the swath of over 7:1. An identical application from 10 ft. above crop, as in our method gave in rather better conditions a recovery of 62 per cent., with the deposit-density variation reduced to 2:1. This performance was much the same as that achieved by the type of emulsion application used in the other experiments described.

In similar conditions, both very-low and normal-volume treatments gave very similar mortalities of Heliothis. Acanthomia was present in only one experiment and was less readily controlled; it required deposits at crop level of about 0·4 lb./acre to give satisfactory mortality, whereas in the same experiment 0·25 lb./acre gave 96 per cent, mortality in a relatively young Heliothis population containing only 10 per cent, of sixth-instar larvae.

Older Heliothis larvae required higher dosages, 0·4 lb./acre at crop level killing only 53 per cent, of a population containing 62 per cent, of sixth-instar larvae. It was shown that there is a regular decrease in the kill inflicted by a given dosage on the successively later instars (from 92 per cent, of the third to 66 per cent, of the sixth) with a recorded deposit of 0·63 lb. DDT per acre.

Except in the first experiment, mortalities were much below those claimed for commercial treatments, even at lower rates of DDT per acre. The reasons for this are discussed, together with the advantages to be expected from a change to the very-low-volume technique with solutions.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1965). Airspraying experiments at Mugugu.—Rep. trop. Pestic. Res. Inst. 1964 pp. 78.Google Scholar
Angermann, R. (1961). Aerial control of the Colorado beetle by ultra-low-volume-spraying.—Agric. Aviat. 3 pp. 4954.Google Scholar
Bondine, V. (1963). Experiments in using aircraft for combating the Colorado beetle.—Agric. Aviat. 5 pp. 911.Google Scholar
Burnett, G. F., Chadwick, P. R., Miller, A. W. D. & Beesley, J. S. S. (1964). Aircraft applications of insecticides in East Africa. XIV.—Bull. ent. Res. 55 pp. 527539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. & Yates, F. (1953). Statistical tables for biological, agricultural and medical research.—4th edn. 126 pp. Edinburgh, &c., Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Lee, C. W. & Yeo, D. (1962). Experiments with rotary atomisers fitted to a Beaver aircraft to produce spray of a desired droplet size.—Misc. Rep. trop. Pestic. Res. Inst. no. 331.Google Scholar
Park, P. O., Lee, C. W. & Burnett, G. F. (1964). Spray distribution from a Piper Pawnee 235 aircraft fitted with boom-and-nozzle equipment.—Misc. Rep. trop. Pestic. Res. Inst. no. 463, 8 pp., multigraph.Google Scholar
Yeo, D. (1961). The Cessna aircraft—limited tests with the Sorensen boom-and-nozzle equipment.—Misc. Rep. trop. Pestic. Res. Inst. no. 310, 2 pp., multigraph.Google Scholar