Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Hostname: page-component-684bc48f8b-4z9h4 Total loading time: 0.216 Render date: 2021-04-11T13:12:12.842Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }
EnglishFrançais
Bulletin of Entomological Research Bulletin of Entomological Research

Article contents

Effect of cabbage cultivars with varying levels of resistance to aphids on the performance of the parasitoid, Aphidius colemani (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

T. Kalule  and
D.J. Wright
T. Kalule
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK
D.J. Wright
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK
Corresponding
E-mail address:
d.wright@bio.ic.ac.uk
Get access
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of aphid resistance in plant cultivars on parasitism of Myzus persicae(Sulzer) and Brevicoryne brassicae (Linnaeus) by Aphidius colemaniViereck was investigated under laboratory conditions using three cultivars of common cabbage, Brassica oleracea var. capitata. Significantly greater aphid populations were found on cv. Derby Day (green-leaved, susceptible to both aphid species), regardless of the presence or absence of parasitoids, compared with cv. Minicole (green-leaved, partially resistant with antibiosis factors for B. brassicae) or cv. Ruby Ball (red-leaved, partially resistant with antixenosis factors for B. brassicae). Minicole had the greatest proportion of parasitized aphids and Derby Day the least. A significantly lower percentage of emerged parasitoids were recorded on Minicole for both aphid species compared with Derby Day and Ruby Ball. The implication of the results are discussed in relation to the integrated control of aphids.

Type
Review Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 92 , Issue 1 , February 2002 , pp. 53 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.
If you should have access and can't see this content please contact technical support.

References

Auclair, J.L. (1989) Host plant resistance. pp. 225–265 in Minks, A.K. & Harrewijn, P. (Eds) Aphids: their biology, natural enemies and control. World Crop Pests 2C, Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Barbosa, P. (1988) Natural enemies and herbivore plant interactions: influence of plant allelochemicals and host specificity. pp. 201–229 in Barbosa, P. & Letourneau, D.K. (Eds) Novel aspects of insect-plant allelochemicals and host specificity. New York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bergman, J.M. & Tingey, W.M. (1979) Aspects of interaction between plant genotypes and biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 25, 275–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Y. & Cloutier, C. (1984) Honeydew as a source of host-searching kairomones for the aphid parasitoid Aphidius nigripes (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 62, 1513–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, B.C. & Duffey, S.S. (1981). Alleviation of tomatin-induced toxicity to the parasitoid, Hyposoter exigua, by phytosterols in the diets of host, Heliothis zea. Journal of Chemical Ecology 7, 927–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R.K., Salto, C.E., Sumner, L.C. & Eikenbary, R.D. (1990) Tritrophic interactions between grains, aphids and a parasitoid. pp. 393–401 in Szentesi, A. & Jermy, T. (Eds) Insect plants: 89, (Symp. Biol. Hungary, 39). Budapest, Academizi Kiado.Google Scholar
Cortesero, A.M., Stapel, J.O. & Lewis, W.J. (2000) Understanding and manipulating plant attributes to enhance biological control. Biological Control 17, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffey, S.S., Bloem, K.A. & Campbell, B.C. (1986) Consequences of sequestration of plant natural products in plant-insect-parasitoid interactions. pp. 31–60 in Boethel, D.J. & Eikenbary, R.D. (Eds) Interactions of plant resistance and parasitoids and predators of insects. New York, Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ellis, P.R., Singh, R., Pink, D.A.C., Lynn, J.R. & Saw, P.L. (1996) Resistance to Brevicoryne brassicae in horticultural brassicas. Euphytica 88, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farid, A., Johnson, J.B., Shafii, B. & Quisenberry, S.S. (1998) Tritrophic studies of Russian wheat aphid, a parasitoid, and resistant and susceptible wheat over three parasitoid generations. Biological Control 12, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeny, P. (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defence. pp. 1–40 in Wallace, J.W. & Mansell, R.L. (Eds) Biochemical interaction between plants and insects. New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Fernandez, C. & Nentwig, W. (1997) Quality control of the parasitoid Aphidius colemani (Hym., Aphidiidae) used for biological control in greenhouses. Journal of Applied Entomology 121, 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfray, H.C.J. (1994) Parasitoids – behavioural and evolutionary ecology. 473 pp. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grasswite, T.R. (1998) Effect of adult experience on the host-location behaviour of the aphid parasitoid Aphidius colemani Viereck (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Biological Control 12, 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, D.J. (1992) Effects of plant variation on herbivore–enemy interactions. pp. 278–298 in Fritz, R.S. & Simms, E.L. (Eds) Plant resistance to herbivore and pathogens – ecology, evolution and genetics. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Herzog, D.C. & Funderburk, J.E. (1985) Plant resistance and cultural practice interactions with biological control. pp. 67–88 in Hoy, M.A. & Hertzog, D.C. (Eds) Biological control in agricultural IPM systems. London, Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, A.D. (1917) [Contribution to discussion]. Journal of Economic Entomology 10, 92–93.Google Scholar
Kausalya, K.G., Nwanze, K.F., Reddy, Y.V.R. & Reddy, D.D.R. (1995) Genotype–pest interactions in sorghum: sorghum midge. pp. 4–7 in Nwanze, K.F. & Youm, O. (Eds) Panicle insect pests of sorghum and pearl millet: proceedings of international consultative workshop. ICRISAT, Niamey, Niger.Google Scholar
Kuo, H.L. (1986) Resistance of oats to cereal aphids: effects on parasitism by Aphelinus asychis (Walker). pp. 125–137 in Boethel, D.J. & Eikenbary, R.D. (Eds) Interactions of plant resistance and parasitoids and predators of insects. New York, Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Messing, R.H. & Rabasse, J.M. (1995) Oviposition behaviour of the polyphagous aphid parasitoid Aphidius colemani Viereck (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 52, 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MSTAT-C (1990) Microcomputer statistics program. Experimental design, data management, data analysis. Institute of International Agriculture, Michigan State University, USA.Google Scholar
Ofuya, I.T. (1995) Colonisation and control of Aphis craccivora Koch (Homoptera: Aphididae) by coccinellid predators in some resistant and susceptible cowpea varieties in Nigeria. Crop Protection 14, 47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, D.B., Boethel, D.J. & Jones, W.A. (1985) Biology of Telenomus chloropus (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) from eggs of Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) reared on resistant and susceptible soybean genotypes. Canadian Entomologist 117, 1137–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, W., Pennacchio, F., Poppy, G.M. & Tremblay, E. (1998) Strategies involved in the location of hosts by the parasitoid Aphidius ervi Haliday (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae). Biological Control 11, 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, P.W. (1986) Ecological aspects of host plant resistance and biological control: interactions among three trophic levels. pp. 11–30 in Boethel, D.J. & Eikenbary, R.D. (Eds) Interactions of plant resistance and parastoids and predators of insects. New York, Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Price, P.W., Bouton, C.E., Gross, P., McPheron, B.A., Thompson, J.N. & Weis, A.E. (1980) Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plant on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11, 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pungerl, N.B. (1984). Host preferences of Aphidius (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) populations parasitising pea and cereal aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 74, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, D.K., Webster, J.A., Jones, B.G. & Burd, J.D. (1991) Tritrophic relationships of Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae), a hymenopterous parasitoid (Diaeretiella rapae McIntosh), and resistant and susceptible small grains. Biological Control 1, 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, D.K., Kindler, S.D. & Springer, T.L. (1992) Interactions of Russian wheat aphid, a hymenopterous parasitoid and resistant and susceptible slender wheatgrasses. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 64, 239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salto, C.E., Eikenbary, R.D. & Starks, K.J. (1983) Compatibility of Lysiphlebus testaceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) with greenbug (Homoptera: Aphididae) biotypes C and E reared on susceptible and resistant oat varieties. Environmental Entomology 12, 603–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, R. & Ellis, P.R. (1993) Sources, mechanisms and bases of resistance in Cruciferae to the cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 16, 21–35.Google Scholar
Starks, K.J., Muniappan, R. & Eikenbary, R.D. (1972) Interaction between plant resistance and parasitism against the greenbug on barley and sorghum. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 65, 650–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storeck, A., Poppy, G.M., van Emden, H.F. & Powell, W. (2000) The role of plant chemical cues in determining host preference in the generalist aphid parasitoid Aphidius colemani. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 97, 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trumble, J.T. (1982) Temporal occurrence, sampling and within-field distribution of aphids on broccoli in coastal California. Journal of Economic Entomology 75, 378–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Emden, H.F. (1986) The interaction of plant resistance and natural enemies: effect on populations of sucking insects. pp. 139–150 in Boethel, D.J. & Eikenbary, R.D. (Eds) Interaction of plant resistance and parasitoids and predators of insects. New York, Elsevier.Google Scholar
van Emden, H.F. (1991) The role of host plant resistance in insect pest mis-management. Bulletin of Entomological Research 81, 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Emden, H.F. (1995) Host plant-Aphidophaga interactions. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 52, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Emden, H.F. & Wratten, S.D. (1991) Tritrophic interactions involving plants in the biological control of aphids. pp. 29–43 in Peters, D.C., Webster, J.A. & Chlouber, C.S. (Eds) Aphid-plant interactions: population to molecules. USDA/Agricultural Research Service and Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
Van Emden, H.F., Sponagl, B., Wagner, E., Baker, T., Ganguly, S. & Douloumpaka, S. (1996) Hopkins' ‘host selection principle’, another nail in its coffin. Physiological Entomology 21, 325–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Lenteren, J.C. (1991) Biological control in a tritrophic system approach. pp. 3–27 in Peters, D.C., Webster, J.A. & Chlouber, C.S. (Eds) Aphid–plant interactions: population to molecules. USDA/Agricultural Research Service and Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
van Steenis, M.J. (1993) Suitability of Aphis gossypii Glov., Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thom.) and Myzus persicae Sulz. (Hom.: Aphididae) as hosts for several aphid parasitoid species (Hym.: Braconidae). IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 16, 157–160.Google Scholar
Verkerk, R.H.J., Leather, S.R. & Wright, D.J. (1998) The potential for manipulating crop–pest–natural enemy interactions for improved insect pest management. Bulletin of Entomological Research 88, 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkerk, R.H.J., Neugebauer, K.R., Ellis, P.R. & Wright, D.J. (1998) Aphids on cabbage: tritrophic and selective insecticide interactions. Bulletin of Entomological Research 88, 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 28 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 11th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Effect of cabbage cultivars with varying levels of resistance to aphids on the performance of the parasitoid, Aphidius colemani (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Effect of cabbage cultivars with varying levels of resistance to aphids on the performance of the parasitoid, Aphidius colemani (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Effect of cabbage cultivars with varying levels of resistance to aphids on the performance of the parasitoid, Aphidius colemani (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *