No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Towards a common equine rationing system across the European Union
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2018
Summary
Since the 1980’s, two feed evaluation systems, the NRC and the INRA, have been proposed, suggesting allowances for energy and protein (Cuddeford, 1998). NRC recommendations include suggestions for digestible energy (DE) and digestible crude protein (DCP in 1978) and later crude protein (CP in 1989). INRA, (from 1984-1990), have firstly suggested the Net Energy System (NE), also referred to as the UFC system in French, (so called, as the NE system relies on expressing the NE value of a feed relative to a reference feed [barley], or Horse Feed Unit). The INRA have also gone on to recommend the Horse Digestible Crude Protein system (HDCP, or MADC in French). Whilst the INRA and NRC systems have both proposed nutritional requirements, the NRC is exclusive in its use of a protocol called the ‘factorial method’.The factorial method was initially contrived to allow for the determination of physiological expenditure, where the efficiencies of the nutrients were known and relevant. Other influences could then be considered by implementing feed trials to determine allowances which would take into account most environmental factors. Both the NRC and the INRA have proposed a range of Dry Matter Intake (DMI) values, which intend to meet the nutritional requirements of differing types of horses. DMI values provided by the INRA have been drawn directly from feeding experiments conducted over the last 30 years. Ingestibility of the main types of forages have also been extensively measured in horses, using feeding trials devoted to that purpose. The following chapter will review existing methods and suggest a progression strategy towards a common rationing system.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 2004
References
Autsbo, A. (2002). The Scandinavian adaptation of the French UFC system. In: Proceedings of the 1st European workshop on Equine Nutrition, Dijon, France 17–18 January, 69-78.Google Scholar
Cuddeford, D. (1998). Feeding systems for Horses. In: Feeding systems and feed evaluation models. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 239–274.Google Scholar
Coenen, M., Mülller, G., Enbergs, H. (2003). Grass silages vs hays in feeding horses. In: Proceedings of the 18th ENPS symposium, Lansing, Michigan, USA, 4-7 June, 138–139.Google Scholar
Corino, C., Miraglia, N., Polidori, M. (1996) Determination of the organic matter digestibility and prediction of the UFC value of Mediterranean forages. In: Proceedings of the 47th EAAP meeting Lillehammer, Norway, 25-29 August, Horse commission, Session 4, Abstract H4.3, p.292.Google Scholar
INRA, (1984). Le Cheval , Edited by R., Jarrige and W., Martin–Rosset, INRA Editions , 78026 Versailles, France, pp 687.Google Scholar
INRA, (1990). Alimentation des chevaux, Edited by W., Martin–Rosset, INRA Editions, 78026 Versailles, France, pp 232.Google Scholar
Hale, C,E., Moore–Colyer, M,J,S. (2001). Volountary food intake and apparent digestibilty of hay, big bales, silages and red clover by ponies. In: Proceedings of the 17th ENPS symposium, Lexington, USA, May 31-June 2,468–469.Google Scholar
Lowman, R.S., Hyslop, J.J., Longland, A.C., Cuddeford, D., Hollands, T. (1999). Evaluation of an in vitro batch culture technique for estimating the in vivo digestibility and digestible energy content of equine feeds using equine faeces as the source of microbial inoculum. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 85:11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin–Rosset, W., Vermorel, M., Doreau, M., Tisserand, J.L., Andrieu, A. (1994). The French horse feed evaluation systems and recommended allowances for energy and protein. Livestock Production Science, 40: 37–56.Google Scholar
Martin–Rosset, W., Andrieu, A., Vermorel, M. (1996). Routine methods for predicting the net energy value (UFC) of feeds in horses. In: Proceedings of the 47th EAAP meeting, Lillehammer, Norway 22-29 August, Horse Commission, Session H4, Abstract H4.1p.292. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Martin–Rosset, W., Vermorel, M. (2002). Evaluation and expression of energy allowances and energy value of feeds in the UFC system for the performance horse. In: Proceedings of the 1st European workshop on Equine Nutrition, Dijon, France, 17-18 January, 19–58.Google Scholar
Martin–Rosset, W., Tisserand, J,L. (2002). Evaluation and expression of protein allowances and protein value of feeds in the MADC system for the performance horse. In: Proceedings of the 1st European workshop on Equine Nutrition, Dijon, France, 17-18 January, 109–148.Google Scholar
Memedeikin, V.G. (1990). The energy and nitrogen systems used in USSR for horses. Proceedings of 41st EAAP meeting Toulouse, 9-12 July, France, Horse Commission, Session 3, Abstract H1.3p382.Google Scholar
Micol, D., Martin–Rosset, W. (1995). Feeding systems for horses on high forage diets in the temperate zone. In: Proceedings of the 4th International symposium on the Nutrition of Herbivores, Clermont–Ferrand, France, September 11-15, INRA Editions 78026 Versailles, France, 569–584.Google Scholar
Miraglia, N., Bergero, B., Gagliardi, D. (2000). Il cavallo atleta. Calderini edagricole edizioni, Bologna, Italy.Google Scholar
NRC, (1978). Nutrients Requirements of Horses. 5th Edition, National Academy Press , Washington D.C, USA, pp 33.Google Scholar
NRC, (1989). Nutrients Requirements of Horses. 6th Edition , National Academy Press, Washington D.C,USA, pp 100.Google Scholar
Zeyner, A., Kienzle, E. (2001). Ein neus Konzept zur energetischen Futterverwetung beim Pferd. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Phys., 10:106.Google Scholar