Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T21:48:51.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of rare and traditional breeds in conservation: the Grazing Animals Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

R.W. Small
R.W. Small*
Affiliation:
School of Biological and Earth Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK
Get access

Abstract

The landscape of the UK has been largely determined by past agricultural practices that have given rise to a range of anthropogenic habitats much valued by conservationists. Many of these have been created by, or for, grazing livestock. The suggestion that grazing and browsing animals were instrumental in ‘cyclical succession’ in the preagricultural period is also gaining ground. For these reasons the use of grazing animals in the management of conservation sites has become more common. Since its foundation in 1997 the Grazing Animals Project (GAP) has promoted and facilitated the use of grazing livestock in management of habitats for conservation.

In 2001 GAP produced, in consultation with animal welfare organizations, A Guide to Animal Welfare in Nature Conservation Grazing. The practical advice in, and approach of, this document is potentially invaluable not only to conservation managers and graziers but also to all keepers of livestock. Another GAP publication, the Breeds Profiles Handbook, gives brief descriptions of 55 breeds of livestock known, or anticipated, to be of value in conservation grazing. Many of these are rare or traditional breeds, as these have the characteristics that enable the stock to thrive on the nutritionally relatively poor forage afforded by many conservation sites. These characteristics are often identified as ‘hardiness’ and ‘thriftiness’, but are poorly defined except through the practical experience of conservation managers.

Conservation grazing is a relatively new niche, and one that cannot be filled by modern breeds or strains adapted to high-input, high-output systems. It is, therefore, a great opportunity for rare and traditional breeds, many of which developed in parallel with habitats now appreciated for their conservation value. This applies not only in the UK but also in other European countries. Moreover, recent developments, such as English Nature's Traditional Breeds Incentive for Sites of Special Scientific Interest, several grazing projects funded by the Heritage Lottery Fund and the Limestone Country Life Project, suggest that this niche is no longer confined to nature reserves.

Conservation grazing can contribute to genetic conservation by:

  • • Enabling an increase in numbers and wider distribution of rare and traditional breeds.

  • • Allowing breeders to identify, and select, those individuals that fare best under relatively austere conditions.

  • • Providing an outlet, or providing additional grazing, for stock that could not otherwise be kept.

  • • Providing a market for good animals without reference to the showring.

  • • Providing a refuge for rare breeds from threats such as that posed by the National Scrapie Plan.

Type
Section 4: Conservation in action
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 30: Farm Animal Genetic Resources , 2004 , pp. 263 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bullock, D.J. and Armstrong, H.M. 2000. Grazing for environmental benefits. In: Grazing management: the principles and practice of grazing, for profit and environmental gain, within temperate grassland systems, Edited by Rook, A.J. and Penning, P.D., British Grassland Society, Reading, UK. pp. 191–200.Google Scholar
Carey, P.D., Barnett, C.L., Greenslade, P.D., Hulmes, S., Garbutt, R.A., Warman, E.A., Myhill, D., Scott, R.J., Smart, S.M., Manchester, S.J., Robinson, J., Walker, K.J., Howard, D.C. and Firbank, L.G. 2002. A comparison of the ecological quality of land between an English agri-environment scheme and the countryside as a whole. Biological Conservation 108: 183–197.Google Scholar
Chatters, C. and Sanderson, N. 1994. Grazing lowland pasture woodland. British Wildlife 6 (2): 78–88.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H., Price, O.F., Albon, S.D. and Jewell, P.A. 1991. Persistent instability and population regulation in Soay sheep. Journal of Animal Ecology 60: 593–608.Google Scholar
Cnossen, H.F. 2002. Rare livestock breeds and nature policy. Vakblad natuurbeheer Special Issue: Grazing and grazing animals: 48.Google Scholar
Cox, J. 1999. The nature conservation importance of dung. British Wildlife 11(1): 28–36.Google Scholar
DEFRA 2001. National scrapie plan for Great Britain. Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, UK.Google Scholar
DEFRA 2002. News release on http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/2002/021111c.htm Google Scholar
Dolman, P.M. and Sutherland, W.J. 1992. The ecological changes of Breckland grass heaths and the consequences of management. Journal of Applied Ecology 29: 402–413.Google Scholar
English Nature 2002. Information from http://www.english-nature.org.uk Google Scholar
Fischer, S.F., Poschlod, P. and Beinlich, B. 1996. Experimental studies on the dispersal of plants and animals on sheep in calcareous grasslands. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 1206–1222.Google Scholar
Gibson, C.W.D. 1997. The effects of horse and cattle grazing on English species-rich grasslands. English Nature Research Reports No. 210. English Nature, Peterborough, UK.Google Scholar
Gordon, I.J., Duncan, P., Grillas, P. and Lecompte, T. 1990. The use of domestic herbivores in the conservation of the biological richness of European wetlands. Bull. Ecol. 31: 49–60.Google Scholar
Grayson, F.W. 1997. Does conservation farming work? Enact 5(4): 19–22.Google Scholar
Grayson, F. W. 2001. Local Grazing Schemes: a best practice guide. 2 nd edn. Grazing Animals Project, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
Harding, P.T. and Rose, F. 1986. Pasture-woodlands in lowland Britain. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Huntingdon, UK.Google Scholar
Hearn, K.A. 1995. Stock grazing of semi-natural habitats on National Trust land. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 56(suppl.): 23–37.Google Scholar
Hester, A.J., Byrne, R. and Lund, J. (eds.) 1999. Grazing management options for native woodlands. Proceedings, Seminar Native Woodlands Group/Hill Land Use and Ecology Discussion Group, MLURI, Aberdeen 23rd April 1998.Google Scholar
Kampfe, H. 2000. The role of large grazing animals in nature conservation – a Dutch perspective. British Wildlife 12(1): 37–46.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. 1998. Rooting for regeneration. Enact 6(4): 4–7.Google Scholar
Key, R. 2000. Bare ground and the conservation of invertebrates. British Wildlife 11(3): 183–191.Google Scholar
Kinsman, D.J.J. 2001. Black sheep of Windermere: a history of the St. Kilda or Hebridean sheep. Windy Hall Publications, Windermere, UK. pp. 6–19.Google Scholar
Kirby, K.J., Thomas, R.C., Key, R.S., McLean, I.F.G. and Hodgetts, N. 1995. Pasture-woodland and its conservation in Britain. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 56(suppl.): 135–153.Google Scholar
Laffaille, P., Lefeuvre, J-C. and Feunteun, E. 2000. Impact of sheep grazing on juvenile sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax L., in tidal salt marshes. Biological Conservation 96: 271–277.Google Scholar
Lake, S., Bullock, J.M. and Hartley, S. 2001. Impacts of livestock grazing on lowland heathland. English Nature Research Report No. 422. English Nature, Peterborough, UK.Google Scholar
Mayle, B. 1999. Domestic stock grazing to enhance woodland biodiversity. Forestry Commission Information Note 28. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Mitchell, F.J.G. and Kirby, K.J. 1990. The impact of large herbivores on the conservation of semi-natural woods in the British uplands. Forestry 63: 333–353.Google Scholar
Oates, M., Harvey, H.J. and Glendell, M. 1998. Grazing sea cliffs and dunes for nature conservation. The National Trust, Cirencester, UK.Google Scholar
Ostermann, O.P. 1998. The need for management of nature conservation sites designated under Natura 2000. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 968–973.Google Scholar
Piggott, C.D. 1983. Regeneration of oak-birch woodland following exclusion of sheep. Journal of Ecology 71: 629–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, R.M., Putnam, R.J., Ekins, J.R. and Edwards, P.J. 1986. Use of habitat by free-ranging cattle and ponies in the New Forest, Southern England. Journal of Applied Ecology 23: 539–557.Google Scholar
Putman, R.J. 1994. Effects of grazing and browsing by mammals on woodlands. British Wildlife 5(4): 205–210.Google Scholar
Putman, R.J., Edwards, P.J., Mann, J.C.E., How, R.C. and Hill, S.D. 1989. Vegetational and faunal changes in an area of heavily grazed woodland following relief of grazing. Biological Conservation 47: 13–32.Google Scholar
Putman, R. J., Pratt, R.M., Ekins, J.R. and Edwards, P.J. 1987. Food and feeding behaviour of cattle and ponies in the New Forest, Hampshire. Journal of Applied Ecology 24: 369–380.Google Scholar
Read, H. 1993. Rare breeds at Burnham Beeches. the Ark 20(7): 253–255.Google Scholar
Read, H. 1994. Native breeds in Burnham Beeches. Enact 2(4): 4–6.Google Scholar
Robertson, H. J., Crowle, A. and Hinton, G. 2001. Interim assessment of the effects of the foot and mouth disease outbreak on England’s biodiversity. English Nature Research Report No. 430. English Nature, Peterborough, UK.Google Scholar
Robinson, R.A. and Sutherland, W.J. 2002. Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 157–176.Google Scholar
Small, R.W. 1994. Conservation and rare breeds of farm livestock. British Wildlife 6(1): 28–36.Google Scholar
Small, R.W. 2002a. Impact of the 2001 outbreak of foot and mouth disease on conservation grazing schemes. Grazing Animals Project. Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
Small, R.W. 2002b. Conservation grazing – a developing opportunity for rare breeds. The Ark 30(1): 27–28.Google Scholar
Small, R.W., Poulter, C. Jeffreys, D.A. and Bacon, J.C. 1999. Towards sustainable grazing for biodiversity: an analysis of conservation grazing projects and their constraints. English Nature Research Report No. 316. English Nature, Peterborough, UK.Google Scholar
Tolhurst, S.A. 1994. Flying flock on Norfolk's heaths. Enact 2(4): 18–20.Google Scholar
Tolhurst, S.A. 1997. Investigation into the use of domestic herbivores for fen grazing management; a document for discussion. Broads Authority, Ipswich, UK.Google Scholar
Tolhurst, S.A. (ed.) 2001. A guide to animal welfare in nature conservation grazing. Grazing Animals Project, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
Tolhurst, S.A. and Oates, M. (eds.) 2001. The breed profiles handbook: a guide to the selection of livestock breeds for grazing wildlife sites. Grazing Animals Project. English Nature, Peterborough, UK.Google Scholar
Townsend, S. 2002. The RBST 2001 members’ survey – an overview. The Ark 30(3): 98–99.Google Scholar
Townsend, S., Warren, S. and Wilson, H. 2002. FMD – how the disease has impacted on different sectors of the rare breeds’ world. The Ark 30(2): 65–68.Google Scholar
Tubbs, C.R. 1991. Grazing the lowland heaths. British Wildlife 2(5): 276–289.Google Scholar
Tubbs, C.R. 1997. The ecology of pastoralism in the New Forest. British Wildlife 9(1): 7–16.Google Scholar
Vera, F.W.M. 2000. Grazing ecology and forest history. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Yalden, D. W. 1982. When did the mammal fauna of the British Isles arrive? Mammal Review 12(1): 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar