Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:03:19.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Laterality and visuo-spatial ability in the equine: Functional measures of sport horse selection?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

Jack Murphy
Affiliation:
F1-145, Foundation Building, Department of Life Sciences, University of Limerick, IrelandJack.Murphy@ul.ie.
Sean Arkins
Affiliation:
SR2022, Schrödinger Building, Department of Life Sciences, University of Limerick, Ireland
Get access

Abstract

Laterality in any organism or species can be manifest as morphological, sensory and functional degrees of asymmetry such as hemispheric dominance, handedness or sidedness and other motor functional behaviours and as such is equally important in equitation. The influence of the horses’ sex on both the direction and the degree of the laterality was explored within and between 4 experimental procedures in the 1st study. The findings showed that the direction, but not the degree of idiosyncratic motor preference in the horses was strongly sex-related. Male horses exhibited significantly more left lateralized responses and female horses exhibited significantly more right lateralized responses. Visuo-spatial ability is also likely to be important in the performance horse. In many species, moderate to large differences in visuo-spatial ability have been reported between the sexes, with superior visuo-spatial ability being reported in males of all species investigated to date. As no known studies had addressed visuo-spatial ability in the equine, the objective of the 2nd study, was to determine if visuo-spatial ability differed between male and female horses. The results produced the first behavioural demonstration of superior visuo-spatial ability in male horses, similar to that reported in other species. There is evidence to suggest that visuospatial ability and motor laterality are associated with cerebral hemispheric asymmetry and may be intrinsically linked. Brain development and laterality have also been associated with hair patterning, and, in a 3rd study we attempted to identify predictors of lateral bias in motor behaviour in horses. We investigated the relationship between the direction of facial hair whorl rotation and the incidence/direction of laterality in the horse. The findings suggest that direction of facial hair whorl rotation may be a useful indicator of lateralised motor behavioural preferences in the horse. We then attempted to establish if laterality was evident at birth in a 4th study, where we explored if neonatal foals exhibited lateralised patterns during and immediately post the birthing process that were correlated with their facial hair whorl patterns. The results showed a significant association between the sex of the foal and the choice of foreleg presented initially during 2nd stage parturition. Significantly more colt foals led with the left foreleg and significantly more filly foals led with the right foreleg than expected purely by random and the behaviour was correlated with facial hair whorl patterns. The findings also suggest that lateralisation in the horse is determined in utero as has also been shown in humans. Comparisons of wholly intact male and female horses are warranted as they might elucidate additional linkages between motor behaviour, visuo-spatial ability and brain organisation and development in the horse. Further research in this area could lead to more appropriate competition conditions (better fence design/construction on cross-country tracks) and so eliminate unnecessary levels of risk associated with many equestrian sports.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Back, W., Schamhardt, H. C., Hartmann, , Bruin, G. & Barnevelt, A. 1995. Predictive value of foal kinematics for the locomotor performance of adult horses. Research Veterinary Science, 59.Google Scholar
Clayton, H. M. 1990. Kinematics of equine jumping. Equine Athlete, 3, 1720.Google Scholar
Deuel, N. R. & Lawrence, L. M. 1987. Laterality in the gallop gait of horses. Journal of Biomechanics, 20, 645-9.Google Scholar
Dyer, K. F. 1977. The trend of the male-female performance differential in athletics, swimming and cycling 1948-1976. Journal of Biosocial Sciences, 9, 325328.Google Scholar
Farrell, M. J. & Robertson, I. H. 2000. The automatic updating of egocentric spatial relationships and its impairment due to right posterior cortical lesions. Neuropsychologia, 38, 585595.Google Scholar
Harries, M., Williams, C., Standish, W. D. & Micheli, L. J. 1996. Oxford Textbook of Sport Medicine . New York: Oxford University Press Inc.Google Scholar
Klar, A. J. S. 1996. A single locus, RGHT, specifies preference for hand utilisation in humans. Cold Spring Harbour Symposia on Quantative Biology, 61, 5965.Google Scholar
Klimke, R. 2003. Basic Training of the Young Horse. London: J. A. Allen.Google Scholar
Linn, M. C. & Peterson, A. C. 1985. Emergence and characterisation of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 4956.Google Scholar
Masters, M. S. & Sanders, B. 1993. Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing? Behaviour of Genetics, 23, 337342.Google Scholar
McCall, C. A. 1990. A review of learning behavior in horses and its application in horse training. Journal of Animal Science, 68, 7581.Google Scholar
McDonnell, S. 2001. How Smart is He? The Thinking Horse. In: The Horse . Murphy, J. & Arkins, S. 2004. The direction of facial hair whorl rotation may be a useful indicator of lateralised behavioural preferences in the horse. In: Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, pp. 74. University of York: BSAS.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. & Arkins, S. 2005. Laterality, suckling behaviour and facial hair whorl patterns in the neonatal foal. In: Internatioal Society of Applied Ethology, pp. 51. Azabu University, Japan: ISAE2005.Google Scholar
Murphy, J., Sutherland, A. & Arkins, S. 2005. Idiosyncratic motor laterality in the horse. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 91, 297310.Google Scholar
Murphy, J., Waldmann, T. & Arkins, S. 2004. Sex differences in equine learning skills and visuo-spatial ability. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 87, 119130.Google Scholar
Randle, H. & Elsworthy, E. 2005. The relationship between facial whorl direction and sidedness in ridden horses. In: Applying Equine Science: Research into business, pp. 50. RAC, Cirencester: BSAS.Google Scholar
Rossdale, P. D. & Ricketts, S. W. 1983. Equine Stud Farm Medicine . London: Balliere Tindall.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, M. 2005. The meaning of natural crookedness of horses in acapuncture. In: 31st IVAS International Congress . Park City, Utah, USA.Google Scholar
Watson, S. J. 1980. A record of International Eventing. Dublin: Bord Na gCapall, Irish Horse Board.Google Scholar
Wilmore, J. H. 1979. The application of science to sport: physiological profiles of male and female athletes. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology, 27, 2531.Google Scholar
Witelson, S. F. 1991. Neural sexual mosaicism: Sexual differentiation of the human temporo-parietal region for functional asymmetry. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 16, 131153.Google Scholar
Wood, S. C. & Fedde, M. R. 1997. Effects of racing and gender on viscoelastic properties of horse blood. Respiration Physiology, 107, 165172.Google Scholar