Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T11:28:05.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Global agenda for livestock research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

H. A. Fitzhugh*
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

The global agenda for livestock research must be led by the requirements for agricultural development, recognizing the integral and complementary rôle livestock play in sustainable agricultural systems. Demand for meat and milk will increase by more than 150 per cent over the next three decades, fuelled by the combination of income growth, population increase and urbanization. Increased demand will be primarily in developing regions, where current consumption per capita is low and livestock production systems are inefficient relative to those in developed countries. This situation encourages development to increase supply of livestock product. Research can facilitate sustainable livestock development to serve the needs of both producers and consumers.

The benefits already realized from past investments in research, primarily in developed countries, help make the case for investing in livestock research. Nevertheless, the resources available for research are limited; choices must be made and expected benefits and costs should guide priorities. These benefits and costs should take into account social and environmental as well as financial values. Procedures for valuing the contribution of livestock research to sustainable development are inadequate and, in themselves, are a priority in the global agenda.

Priorities for research differ but are generally linked across the levels of agricultural systems: household, community, landscape, national, regional and international. Specific priorities in the global agenda vary with livestock species (ruminant, non-ruminant), production systems (grazing, mixed, industrial), agro-ecological and socio-economic factors (especially, those differing for developed and developing regions) and whether research will be supported by public or private sector funding. The priorities for developing countries emphasize increasing productivity and efficiency; whereas for developed countries, more emphasis is given to food safety, zoonotic diseases and environmental issues. Non-traditional, but increasingly important priorities derive from the need for information and technologies to improve soil and water management to ensure long-term sustainability of livestock production systems and for socio-economic analysis to provide policy options for decision makers.

The global agenda for livestock research is broad, embracing the full spectrum from basic to adaptive research. The traditional animal sciences will continue to be important but there is increasing need to draw from crop and environment research, from human health and genetics research, inter alia. Results from research in developed regions can be adapted to the needs of livestock systems in developing regions. In return, research on genetic resistance developed through natural selection in livestock populations in developing regions, may provide environmentally friendly means to control livestock disease and parasites in developed regions.

The challenges posed by the global agenda are considerable. To meet these challenges, partnerships are required, linking skills, capacities and access to problems. The successes of these research partnerships will meet the requirements for sustainable agricultural development and ensure support for livestock research in the future.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, J. M., Norton, G. W. and Pardey, P. G. 1995. Science under scarcity: principles and practice for agricultural research evaluation and priority setting. Cornell University Press, Cornell, New York.Google Scholar
Delgado, C., Coubois, C. and Rosegrant, M. 1998. Global food demand and the contribution of livestock as we enter the new millennium. In Food, lands and livelihoods: setting research agendas for animal science (ed. Gill, M., Smith, T., Pollot, G., Owen, E. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 2742. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 21.Google Scholar
Devendra, C. and Gardiner, P. 1995a. Global agenda for livestock research: South-East Asia. Proceedings of a consultation for the South Asia region, IRRI, Los Baños, The Philippines, 10–13 May 1995. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Devendra, C. and Gardiner, P. 1995b. Global agenda for livestock research: South Asia. Proceedings of a consultation for the South Asia region, ICRISAT Asia centre, Patancheru, India. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Devendra, C. and Gardiner, P. 1995c. Global agenda for livestock research. Proceedings of a consultation. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Fitzhugh, H. A. 1998. The competition between livestock and mankindfor nutrients — let ruminants eat grass. In Feeding the world population. Proceedings of the Rank Prize Funds, pp. 223231. Oxford University Press, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
Haan, C. de, , Steinfeld, H. and Blackburn, H. 1997. Livestock and the environment: finding a balance. European Commission Directorate General for Development, Brussels Google Scholar
International Food Policy Research Institute. 1995. A 2020 vision for food, agriculture, and the environment. IFPRI, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
International Livestock Research Institute. 1995. Latin American and Caribbean livestock research priorities: summary report. IICA/RISPAL, San Jose, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
International Livestock Research Institute. 1997. Medium-term plan: 1998-2000. ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Ole MoiYoi, O. K. 1995. Casein kinase II in theileriosis. Science 267: 834836.Google Scholar
Powell, J. M., Fernandez-Rivera, S., Williams, T. O. and Renard, C. 1995. Livestock and sustainable nutrient cycling in mixed farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa, volume II: technical papers. Proceedings of an international conference. International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Renard, C. 1997. Crop residues in sustainable mixed crop/livestock farming systems. Proceedings of a conference sponsored by Systemwide Livestock Programme. ILRI/ ICRISAT/CABI International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sere, G. and Steinfeld, H. 1996. World livestock production systems: current status, issues and trends. FAO Animal production and health paper no. 127. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.Google Scholar