Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T15:19:44.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Current and future potential of alternative techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

D. I. Givens
Affiliation:
Feed Evaluation and Nutritional Sciences, ADAS Drayton, Alcester Road, Stratford-on-Avon CV37 9RQ
M. Gill
Affiliation:
Natural Resources International, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime ME4 4TB
Get access

Abstract

Ruminant animal production faces numerous challenges and it seems that both economic and biological benefits will be derived from moving food characterization from simple energy and protein-based approaches to those which assess nutrient supply in some detail. In vitro systems will need to reflect this change and this paper considers in particular, the need for estimations of rumen volatile fatty acids and microbial protein supplies. Emphasis is placed on the possibility that in vitro techniques can be used to provide biochemical data which can themselves be used in mathematical models of wider processes. This paper also examines the need for in vitro techniques to reflect the microbial!animal response to the physical structure of foods and also the requirement for in vitro approaches which ask why a food has a certain value rather than simply what the value is. In vitro techniques also have a substantial role outside the digestive tract in predicting factors such as voluntary food intake and some aspects of tissue metabolism and some of these aspects are considered. Tor practical application in vitro techniques will need to provide value for money and be compatible as parameters in mathematical models to have an impact at farm level. In this regard physical in vitro techniques such as NIRS seem to have enormous potential.

Type
Complex rumen transformations
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aufrère, J., Boulberhane, D., Graviou, D., Andrieu, J. P. and Demarquilly, C, 1994. Characterization of in situ degradation of lucerne proteins according to roughage type (green forage, hay and silage) using gel electrophoresis. Animal Teed Science and Technology 50: 7585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. W., Givens, D. I. and Deaville, E. R. 1994. Prediction of organic matter digestibility in vivo of grass silage by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy: effect of calibration method, residual moisture and particle size. Animal feed Science and Technology 50:1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R. L. and Jesse, B. W. 1991. Technical note: Isolation and characterisation of sheep rumen epithelial cells. Journal of Animal Science 69:3603.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. L. and Jesse, B. W. 1996. Propionate modulation of rumen ketogenesis. Journal of Animal Science 74:16941700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beever, D. E. 1993. Rumen function. In: Quantitative aspects of ruminant digestion and metabolism(ed. Forbes, J. M. and France, J.), pp. 187215. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Beuvink, J. M. W. and Spoelstra, S. F. 1992. Interactions between substrate, fermentation end products, buffering systems and gas production upon fermentation of different carbohydrates by mixed rumen microorganisms in vitro . Applied Microbiology and Technology 37:505509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blümmel, M. and Bullerdieck, P. 1997. The need to complement in vitro gas production measurements with residue determinations from in sacco degradabilities to improve the prediction of voluntary intake of hays. Animal Science 64: 7175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blümmel, M. and Ørskov, E. R. 1993. Comparison of in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughage in predicting feed intake in cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 40:109119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blümmel, M., Steingab, H. and Becker, K. 1994. The partitioning of in vitro fermentation products and its bearing for voluntary feed intake. Proceedings of the Society for Nutrition and Physiology 3:123 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Boever, J. L. de, ., Cottyn, B. G., Buysse, F. X., Wainman, F. W. and Vanacker, J. M. 1986. The use of an enzymatic technique to predict digestibility, metabolizable and net energy of compound feedstuffs for ruminants. Animal Peed Science and Technology 14:203214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G. and Choung, J.-J. 1995. The importance of rate of ruminal fermentation of energy sources in diets for dairy cows. In: Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition-1995(ed. Garnsworthy, P. C. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 327. Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
Chandra, G. S., Proudlove, M. O. and Bamforth, C. W. 1996. The effect of morphological structure on the digestibility of barley endosperm. Report on project no. 0027/ 1/92A. Home Grown Cereals Authority, London.Google Scholar
Chenost, M. and Grenet, E. 1971. L'indice de fibrosité des fourrages: sa signification et son utilisation pour la prevision de la valeur alimentation des fourrages. Annaes de Zootechnie 20:427435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherney, D. R., Volenec, J. J. and Cherney, J. H. 1992. Protein solubility and degradability in vitro as influenced by buffer and maturity of alfalfa. Animal Feed Science and Technology 37: 920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cone, J. W., Gelder, A. H. van, and Driehuis, F. 1997. Description of gas production profiles with a three phasic model. Animal Feed Science and Technology 66:3145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cone, J. W., Gelder, A. H. van, ., Veerman, E. T. and Vuuren, A. M. van., 1994. In vitro estimation of rumen fermentable organic matter using rumen fluid and a cell free preparation of rumen fluid. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 42:343356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaville, E. R. 1995. Influence of food processing on the in vitro fermentation profiles of ruminant foods using the gas production technique. Animal Science 60:542 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Deaville, E. R. and Givens, D. I. 1996a. Prediction of the non-fermentable energy fraction of grass silage using near infra-red reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS). Animal Science 62: 681682 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Deaville, E. R. and Givens, D. I. 1996b. The prediction of the in vitro cell wall degradability characteristics of grass silage by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS). Animal Science 62:681 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Fakhri, S., Moss, A. R., Givens, D. I. and Owen, E. 1998. Concentrate foods: is all degraded organic matter fermented? In In vitro techniques for measuring nutrient supply to ruminants(ed. Deaville, E. R., Owen, E., Adesogan, A. T., Rymer, C., Huntington, J. A. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 262263. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 22.Google Scholar
Faverdin, P., Baumont, R. and Ingvartsen, K. L. 1995. Control and prediction of feed intake in ruminants. In: Recent Developments in the Nutrition of Herbivores(ed. Journet, M., Grenet, E., Farce, M.-H., Theriez, M. and Demarquilly, C.), pp. 95120. INRA Editions, Paris.Google Scholar
France, J., Dhanoa, M. S., Theodorou, M. K., Lister, S. J., Davies, D. R. and Isaac, D. 1993. A model to interpret gas accumulation profiles associated with in vitro degradation of ruminant feeds. Journal ofTheoretical Biology 163:99111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M. and Robinson, P. H. 1995. Diurnal patterns in crude protein and amino acid flow in the duodenum and the influence of time of feeding a protein meal to lactating cows. Annales de Zootechnie 44: (supplement) 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenet, E. 1989. A comparison of the digestion and reduction in particle size of lucerne hay (Medicago sativa) and Italian ryegrass hay (Lolium italicum) in the ovine digestive tract. British Journal of Nutrition 62:493507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hancock, K. R., Ealing, P. M. and White, D. W. R. 1994. Identification of sulphur-rich proteins which resist rumen degradation but are hydrolysed rapidly by intestinal proteases. British Journal of Nutrition 72:855863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, L. E. and Phillipson, A. T. 1962. The measurement of the flow of food to the duodenum of sheep. Animal Production 4:97116.Google Scholar
Khazaal, K., Dentinho, M. T., Riberio, J. M. and Ørskov, E. R. 1993. A comparison of gas production during incubation with rumen contents in vitro and nylon bag degradability as predictors of the apparent digestibility in vivo and the voluntary intake of hays. Animal Production 57: 105112.Google Scholar
Lloyd, D., Ellis, J. E., Hillman, K. and Williams, A. G. 1992. Membrane inlet mass spectrometry: probing the rumen ecosystem. Journal of Applied Bacteriology(Symposium supplement), 73:15551635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, T. A., Phillippe, R. C, Rode, L. M. and Cheng, K.-J. 1993. Effect of the protein matrix on the digestion of cereal grains by ruminal microorganisms. Journal of Animal Science 71: 205212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, P. A., Chamberlain, D. G., Robertson, S. and Hirst, D. 1994. Rumen fermentation patterns in sheep receiving silages of different chemical composition supplemented with concentrates rich in starch or in digestible fibre. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 122:145150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messman, M. A. and Weiss, W. P. 1994. Use of electrophoresis to quantify ruminal degradability of protein from concentrate feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 49:2325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, A. R. and Givens, D. I. 1998. Improved differentiation of carbohydrate pools using a multiphasic model to describe gas production from cell wall and cell content fractions compared with that from whole food. In In vitro techniques for measuring nutrient supply to ruminants(ed. Deaville, E. R., Owen, E., Adesogan, A. T., Rymer, C., J. A.|Huntington and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 221223. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 22.Google Scholar
Offer, N. W., Thomas, C. and Dewhurst, R. J. 1995. Validation of advisory models for the prediction of voluntary intake of grass silage by lambs and dairy cows. Animal Science 60:515 (abstr.).Google Scholar
O'Hara, M. and Ohki, K. 1973. Studies on the mode of gas production in an artificial rumen and its application to the evaluation of feedstuffs. III. The mode of volatile fatty acid production and its relation to the gas production rate. Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science 44:432439.Google Scholar
Phillips, G. D. and Dyck, G. W. 1964. The flow of digesta into the duodenum of sheep. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 44:220227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. H. 1996. Strategies of feeding soybean meal to primiparous dairy cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 76:105112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romney, D. L. 1997. Intake of poor quality roughages and effect of feeding forage mixtures. Natural Resources Institute internal report. March 1997.Google Scholar
Rosales, M. 1996. In vitro assessment of the nutritive value of mixtures of leaves from tropical fodder trees. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Rymer, C, Moss, A. R., Deaville, E. R. and Givens, D. I. 1998. Factors affecting the amount of indirect gas produced by the in vitro gas production technique. In: In vitro techniques for measuring nutrient supply to ruminants(ed. Deaville, E. R., Owen, E., Adesogan, A. T., Rymer, C., Huntington, J. A. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 8991. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 22.Google Scholar
Sanderson, R., Lister, S. and Dhanoa, M. 1994. Use of near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to monitor changes in the composition of rumen fluid. Animal Production 58: 454 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Sanderson, R., Lister, S., Sargent, A. and Dhanoa, M. 1997. Effect of particle size on in vitro fermentation of silages differing in dry matter content. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science 1997, p. 197.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D., Dijkstra, J. and Mertens, D. 1995. Optimisation of ruminal digestion: a modelling approach. In: Recent Developments in the Nutrition of Herbivores(ed. Journet, M., Grenet, E., Farce, M.-H., Theriez, M. and Demarquilly, C.). INRA Editions, Paris, pp. 161166.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D. and Milgen, J. van, . 1995. Dynamic aspects of carbohydrate and protein breakdown and the associated microbial matter synthesis. In: Ruminant physiology: digestion, metabolism, growth and reproduction(ed. Engelhardt, W. v., Leonhard-Marek, S., Breves, G. and Giesecke, D.), pp. 7191. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schofield, P. and Pell, A. N. 1995. Measurement and kinetic analysis of the neutral detergent-soluble carbohydrate fraction of legumes and grasses. Journal of Animal Science 73:34553463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sileshi, Z., Owen, E., Dhanoa, M. S. and Theodorou, M. K. 1996. Prediction of in situ rumen dry matter disappearance of Ethiopian forages from an in vitro gas production technique using a pressure transducer, chemical analyses or in vitro digestibility. Animal Feed Science and Technology 61:7387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, R. W. J., Gordon, F. J., Mayne, C. S., Agnew, R. E., Kilpatrick, D. J., Unsworth, E. F., Barnes, R. J., Porter, M. G. and Pippard, C. J. 1995. Prediction of silage intake by cattle. Animal Science 60:514 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Hart, I. C, Broster, W. H., Elliot, R. J. and Schuller, E. L. 1986. Feeding frequency for dairy cows: effect on rumen fermentation and blood metabolites and hormones. British Journal of Nutrition 56:181192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, P. C. and Martin, P. A. 1988. The influence of nutrient balance on milk yield and composition. In Nutrition and lactation in the dairy cow(ed. Garnsworthy, P. C.), pp. 97118. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18:104111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travis, A. J. and Chesson, A. 1994. The importance of quantitative assessment of plant anatomy to agricultural production. Monograph, Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Trenkle, A. 1970. Effects of short chain fatty acids, feeding, fasting and type of diet on plasma insulin levels in sheep. Journal of Nutrition 100:13231330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vérité, R., Michalet-Doreau, B., Chapoutot, P., Peyraud, J. L. and Poncet, C. 1987. Revision du system des proteines digestible dans l'intestin. Technical Bulletin CRZV Theix, INRA, volume 70, pp. 1934.Google Scholar
Vuuren, A. M. van, , Huhtanen, P. and Dulphy, J. P. 1995. Improving the feeding and health values of ensiled forages. In: Recent Developments in the Nutrition of Herbivores(ed. Journet, M., Grenet, E., Farce, M.-H., Theriez, M. and Demarquilly, C.), pp 279307. INRA Editions, Paris.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. R. 1993. Organisation of forage plant tissues. In: Forage cell wall structure and digestibility(ed. Jung, H. G., Buxton, D. R., Hatfield, R. D. and Ralph, J.), pp. 132. American Society of Agronomy, Madison.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. R., Deinum, B. and Engels, F. M. 1991. Effect of temperature on anatomical structure, rate of digestion of different cell types and dry matter digestibility of leaf and stem of some tropical and temperate forage species. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 39:3148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar