Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-25T05:26:51.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

7.2 Meat production from goats in developing countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. Devendra
C. Devendra
Affiliation:
Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Get access

Extract

In animal production systems, a particular species is utilized for two main reasons. First, because of its ability to adapt to a particular environment and use the existing resources efficiently. Second, and more particularly, its economic importance both actual and potential, which can be achieved by adjustment of the environment to suit this production. In this context, these factors are of significance to goats since they represent an important component of the livestock economies and are valued for a variety of reasons in developing countries (Devendra and Burns, 1970; Devendra, 1979a).

Type
Intensive Production of Small Ruminants
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 4: Intensive Animal Production in Developing Countries , January 1981 , pp. 395 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Buvanendran, V. and Jalatge, E. F A. 1974. A. note on comparative growth rates of Jamunapari, South India goats and their crosses. Ceylon vet. J. 22: 14–19.Google Scholar
Castillo, J., Garcia, O. and Osal, N. 1972. The Criollo x Nubian crossbred. I. Kid growth. Agronomia Tropical 22: 251–25.Google Scholar
Chenost, M. and Geoffroy, F. 1971. Observations sur Ie compotement D'um tioupeau de caprins laiters da race Alpine en Zone tropicale humide. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Goat Breed17–19th July, Tours, France, pp. 241–250.Google Scholar
Devendra, C. 1972. The composition of milk of British Alpine and Anglo-Nubian goats imported into Trinidad. J. Dairy Res. 39: 381–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devendra, C. 1976a. Productivity of goats and sheep in Malaysia. I. The potential contribution from goats. Symp. on Smallholder Livestock Production and Development Bull. No. 144, Ministry of Agric. Malaysia, pp. 29–47.Google Scholar
Devendra, C. 1976b.The utilization of agro-industrial by-products in Asia and the Far East. FAO Technical Consultation on New Feed Resources, Rome, 22–24th Nov. Italy. FAO Anim. Prod, and Hlth Paper No. 4, pp. 111–124.Google Scholar
Devendra, C. 1978.The digestive efficiency of goats. Wld Rev. Anim. Prod. 14: 9–22.Google Scholar
Devendra, C. 1979a. The potential of sheep and goats in world food production. J. Anim. Sci. (In press).Google Scholar
Devendra, C. 1979b. Goat and sheep production potential in the Asian region. Wld Anim. Rev. (FAO). (In press).Google Scholar
Devendra, C.Burns, M. 1970. Goat Production in the Tropics. Tech. Commun. No. 19, Common. Bur. Anim. Breed. Genet., Farnham Royal, Commonwealth Agriculture Bureaux, × 11 + 184 pp.Google Scholar
Devendra, C. and Chenost, M. 1973. Goats of the West Indies. Z. Tierzucht. ZuchtBiol. 91: 130–132.Google Scholar
Devendra, C. and Raghavan, G. V. 1978. Agricultural by-products in South East Asia: availability, utilization and potential value. Wld Rev. Anim. Prod. 14: 11–27.Google Scholar
Fao 1977. Production Yearbook, Vol. 31, Rome: FAO, 291 pp.Google Scholar
Guha, H., Gupta, S., Mukherjee, A. K., Moulick, S. K. and Bhattacharya, S. 1968. Some causes of variation in the growth rates of Black Bengal goats. Indian J. vet. Sci. 38: 269–278.Google Scholar
Henrotte, A. 1961. Etude du cheptel caprin dans le Bas Congo. Bull, agric. Congo. 52:1279–1293.Google Scholar
Hutchison, H. G. 1964. 4th Ann. Rpt, 1963. Livesock Research Division, Ministry of Agriculture, Tanganyika, (Mimeograph, 85 pp).Google Scholar
McDowell, R. E. and Bove, L. 1977. The goat as a producer of meat. Cornell Int. agric. Mineograph No. 6,40 pp.Google Scholar
MBA, A. U., Boyo, B S. and Oyenuga, V. A. 1975. Studies on the milk composition of West African dwarf, Red Sokoto and Saanen goats at different states of lactation. I. Total solids, solids-not-fat, protein, lactoses and energy contents of milk. J. Dairy Res. 42: 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osei, J. K. 1973. The economics of sheep and goat production in the greater Accra region. Ghana Farmer 17: 13–17.Google Scholar
Owen, J. E. and Norman, G. A. 1977. Studies on the meat production characteristics of Botswana goats and sheep. Part I: Sampling, methods and materials and measurements on the live animals. Meat Sci. 1: 63–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papas, A. and Papachristodoulou, S. 1975. Factors affecting the economics of sheep and goats. Agric. Earn. Rpt, No. 4, p. 29.Google Scholar
Sachdeva, K. K., Sengar, O. P. S., Singh, S. N. and Lindahl, I. L. 1973. Studies on goats. I. Effect of plane of nutrition on the reproductive performance of does. J. agric. Sci., Comb. 80: 375–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacker, G. I. and Trail, J. C. M. 1966. Production characteristics of a herd of East African Mubende goats. Trap. Agric 43: 43–51.Google Scholar
Sada, I. and Vohradsky, F. 1973. West African Dwarf goats in Ghana. II. Growth rate and selection criteria. Agric. Res. 6: 173–184.Google Scholar
Singh, S. M. and Sengar, O. P. S. 1970. Final Tech. Rpt P.L. 480 Res. Project No. A7-AH-18, Dept. of Anim. Husbandry Dairying, R.B.S. College, Bichpuri, Agra, India, 259 pp.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. C., Alder, F. E. and Rudman, J. E. 1957. Fill and carcass changes of yard fed and ourwintered beef cattle turned onto spring pasture. Nature 179: 197–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueckermann, L. 1969. Producksiestudies met Boerbokke. M.Sc. Thesis., University of Pretoria.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. N. 1958. The effect ofplane of nutrition on the growth and development of the East African Dwarf goat. Part II. Age changes in the carcass composition of female kids. J. Agric. Sci. 51: 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar