Skip to main content Accessibility help

Don't Call It a Comeback: Autocratic Ruling Parties After Democratization

  • Michael K. Miller (a1)


When autocratic ruling parties accede to democratization, they do not always fade away into history. Following forty-one transitions since 1940, including those in Mexico, Taiwan, Bulgaria and Ghana, the ruling party survived and won power after democratization. Why do some former autocratic parties prosper under democracy while others quickly dissolve? What effect does this have on democratic survival? This article uses original data to predict the post-transition fates of eighty-four autocratic ruling parties through 2015. Whereas extant theories emphasize radical reinvention and outsider struggle, the author argues that success is instead about maintaining ruling-party advantages into the democratic period. Parties succeed when they have authoritarian legacies that easily translate to democratic competition, such as broad programmatic experience, strong organization and policy success. In addition, democratic institutions that disadvantage new parties and actors benefit autocratic parties. Lastly, an instrumental variables design shows that autocratic party success negatively impacts democratic survival and quality.


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. E-mail:


Hide All
Albertus, M and Menaldo, V (2018) Authoritarianism and the Elite Origins of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baker, B (1998) The class of 1990: how have the autocratic leaders of sub-Saharan Africa fared under democratisation? Third World Quarterly 19(1), 115127.
Bernhard, M and Karakoç, E (2007) Civil society and the legacies of dictatorship. World Politics 59, 539567.
Birch, S (2003) Electoral Systems and Political Transformation in Post-Communist Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Boix, C (1999) Setting the rules of the game: the choice of electoral systems in advanced democracies. American Political Science Review 93(3), 609624.
Boix, C, Miller, MK and Rosato, S (2013) A complete data set of political regimes, 1800–2007. Comparative Political Studies 46(12), 15231554.
Brownlee, JM (2007) Hereditary succession in modern autocracies. World Politics 59, 595628.
Burgess, K and Levitsky, S (2003) Explaining populist party adaptation in Latin America: environmental and organizational determinants of party change in Argentina, Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela. Comparative Political Studies 36(8), 859880.
Cheeseman, N (2010) African elections as vehicles for change. Journal of Democracy 21(4), 139153.
Cheibub, JA, Gandhi, J and Vreeland, JR (2010) Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice 143, 67101.
Cheng, T-J (2008) Embracing defeat: the KMT and the PRI after 2000. In Friedman, E and Wong, J (eds), Political Transitions in Dominant Party Systems: Learning to Lose. New York: Routledge, pp. 127147.
Coppedge, M et al. (2016) V-Dem [Country-Year/Country-Date] Dataset, Version 6. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
Correlates of War Project (2015) Territorial Change, 1816–2014 (Version 5.0). Available from
Freedom House (2016) Freedom in the World 2016: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Friedman, E and Wong, J (eds) (2008) Political Transitions in Dominant Party Systems: Learning to Lose. New York: Routledge.
Geddes, B (1999) What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science 2, 115144.
Geddes, B, Wright, J and Frantz, E (2014) Authoritarian breakdown and regime transitions: a new data set. Perspectives on Politics 12(2), 313331.
Goemans, HE, Gleditsch, KS and Chiozza, G (2016) Archigos: A Data Set on Leaders, 1875–2015, Version 4.1.
Grzymala-Busse, A (2002) Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grzymala-Busse, A (2008) The communist exit in East Central Europe and its consequences. In Friedman, E and Wong, J (eds), Political Transitions in Dominant Party Systems: Learning to Lose. New York, Routledge, pp. 91105.
Grzymala-Busse, A (2019) Hoist on their own petards? The reinvention and collapse of authoritarian successor parties. Party Politics 25(4), 569–82.
Haber, S and Menaldo, V (2011) Do natural resources fuel authoritarianism? A reappraisal of the resource curse. American Political Science Review 105, 126.
Harmel, R and Robertson, JD (1985) Formation and success of new parties: a cross-national analysis. International Political Science Review 6(4), 501523.
Henisz, WJ (2013) The Political Constraint Index Dataset. Available from
Hicken, A (2009) Building Party Systems in Developing Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hicken, A and Kuhonta, EM (2011) Shadows from the past: party system institutionalization in Asia. Comparative Political Studies 44(5), 572597.
Ishiyama, J (1997) The sickle or the rose? Previous regime types and the evolution of the ex-communist parties in post-communist politics. Comparative Political Studies 30(3), 299330.
Ishiyama, J (2008) Learning to lose (and sometimes win): the neocommunist parties in post-soviet politics. In Friedman, E and Wong, J (eds), Political Transitions in Dominant Party Systems: Learning to Lose. New York, Routledge, pp. 148168.
Ishiyama, J and Quinn, JJ (2006) African phoenix? Explaining the electoral performance of the formerly dominant parties in Africa. Party Politics 12(3), 317340.
Jhee, B-K (2008) Economic origins of electoral support for authoritarian successors: a cross-national analysis of economic voting in new democracies. Comparative Political Studies 41(3), 362388.
Karl, TL (1990) Dilemmas of democratization in Latin America. Comparative Politics 23(1), 121.
Keefer, P (2012) Database of Political Institutions: Changes and Variable Definitions. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Kitschelt, H (1995) Formation of party cleavages in post-communist democracies: theoretical propositions. Party Politics 1, 447472.
Kitschelt, H et al. (1999) Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kuenzi, M and Lambright, G (2005) Party systems and democratic consolidation in Africa's electoral regimes. Party Politics 11(4), 423446.
Langston, J (2017) Democratization and Authoritarian Party Survival: Mexico's PRI. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levitsky, S (2003) Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levitsky, S and Way, L (2013) The durability of revolutionary regimes. Journal of Democracy 24(3), 516.
Lijphart, A (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Loxton, J (2015) Authoritarian successor parties. Journal of Democracy 26(3), 157170.
Loxton, J (2018) Introduction: authoritarian successor parties worldwide. In Loxton, J and Mainwaring, S (eds), Life After Dictatorship: Authoritarian Successor Parties Worldwide. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 149.
Loxton, J and Mainwaring, S (eds) (2018) Life After Dictatorship: Authoritarian Successor Parties Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mainwaring, S and Pérez-Liñán, A (2013) Democracies and Dictatorships in Latin America: Emergence, Survival, and Fall. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mares, I and Carnes, ME (2009) Social policy in developing countries. Annual Review of Political Science 12, 93113.
Marshall, MG and Jaggers, K (2017). Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2016. Washington, DC: Center for Systemic Peace, George Mason University.
Matanock, AM (2017). Electing Peace: From Civil Conflict to Political Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, MK (2015) Democratic pieces: autocratic elections and democratic development since 1815. British Journal of Political Science 45(3), 501530.
Miller, MK (2016) Democracy by example? Why democracy spreads when the world's democracies prosper. Comparative Politics 49(1), 83116.
Miller, MK (2019) Replication Data for: “Don't Call It a Comeback: Autocratic Ruling Parties after Democratization,, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:b5QX51OTJT6WkexpgSk5BQ== [fileUNF]
Orenstein, M (1998) A genealogy of communist successor parties in East-Central Europe and the determinants of their success. East European Politics and Societies 12, 472499.
Pop-Eleches, G (2008) A party for all seasons: electoral adaptation of Romanian communist successor parties. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 41, 465479.
Randall, V and Svåsand, L (2002) Political parties and democratic consolidation in Africa. Democratization 9(3), 3052.
Riedl, RB (2014) Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Party Systems in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, R, Mishler, W and Haerpfer, C (1998) Democracy and its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Seligson, AL and Tucker, JA (2005) Feeding the hand that bit you: voting for ex-authoritarian rulers in Russia and Bolivia. Demokratizatsiya 13(1), 1142.
Serra, G (2013) Demise and resurrection of a dominant party: understanding the PRI's comeback in Mexico. Journal of Politics in Latin America 3, 133154.
Slater, D and Wong, J (2013) The strength to concede: ruling parties and democratization in developmental Asia. Perspectives on Politics 11(3), 717733.
Svolik, M (2012) The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tavits, M (2013) Post-Communist Democracies and Party Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tir, J et al. (1998) Territorial changes, 1816–1996: procedures and data. Conflict Management and Peace Science 16, 8997.
Waller, M (1995) Adaptation of the former communist parties of East-Central Europe: a case of social-democratization? Party Politics 1(4), 473490.
Wig, T, Hegre, H and Regan, P (2015) Updated data on institutions and elections 1960–2012: Presenting the IAEP dataset version 2.0. Research & Politics May: 1–11.
World Bank (2015) Statistics retrieved 2016, from World Development Indicators Online. Available from
Wright, J and Escribà-Folch, A (2012) Authoritarian institutions and regime survival: transitions to democracy and subsequent autocracy. British Journal of Political Science 42(2), 283309.
Ziblatt, D (2017) Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Miller supplementary material
Miller supplementary material 1

 PDF (142 KB)
142 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed