Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T08:47:17.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The importance of the body's need for zinc in determining Zn availability in food: a principle demonstrated in the rat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Göran Hallmans
Affiliation:
Biophysics Laboratory, University of Umeå, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
Ulf Nilsson
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Research, University of Umeå, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
Rolf Sjöström
Affiliation:
Department of Oral Roentgenology, University of Umeå, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
Lars Wetter
Affiliation:
Department of PathologyUniversity of Umeå, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
Kenneth Wing
Affiliation:
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Umeå, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The hypothesis that the availability of zinc in a food is limited by factors in the food was tested against the hypothesis that Zn absorption is homeostatically regulated by the body according to its need for Zn.

2. The experimental model used was the short-term administration to rats of a parenteral nutrition solution with no added Zn in an attempt to increase their need for Zn in an anabolic phase.

3. The absorption and retention of 65Zn from a piece of endosperm-wheat crisp-bread in rats injected intraperitoneally with the parenteral nutrition solution was more than 40% higher than that in a control group injected with physiological saline (9 g sodium chloride/l).

4. The results indicate that the availability of Zn in the bread is not fixed but variable and dependent on the body's need for Zn.

Type
Clinical and Human Nutrition papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1987

References

REFERENCES

Gordon, W. & White, P. J. (1978). South African Medical Journal 54, 823824.Google Scholar
Hallmans, G. (1978). Acra Dermato-Venereological 58, Suppl., 80.Google Scholar
Heth, D. A. & Hoekstra, W. G. (1965). Journal of Nutrition 85, 367374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R. G., Tasman-Jones, C., Pybus, J., Whiting, R. & Black, H. (1976). Annals of Surgery 183, 331340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latimer, J. S., McClain, C. J. & Sharp, H. L. (1980). Journal of Pediatrics 97, 434437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, A. S. (1979). Zinc in Human Nutrition. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, A. E. (1979). In The Loboratory Rat, vol. 1, Biology and Diseases, pp. 123152 [Baker, H. J., Lindsey, J. R. and Weisbroth, S. H., editors]. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, A.-S., Hasselblad, C. & Hasselblad, K. (1982). British Journal of Nutrition 48, 185191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandstead, H. H., Munoz, J. M., Jacob, R. A., Klevay, L. M., Reck, S. J., Logan, G. M., Dintzes, F. R., Inglett, G. E. & Shney, W. C. (1978). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 31, 180184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandström, B., Andersson, H., Bosaeus, J., Flakheden, T., Göransson, H. & Melkersson, M. (1983). Human Nutrition: Clinical Nutrition 37 C, 295300.Google Scholar
Sandström, B., Arvidsson, B., Cederblad, A. & Björn-Rasmussen, E. (1980). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 33, 739745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. & Cochran, W. (1967). Statistical Methodr, 6th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Weigand, E. & Kirchgessner, M. (1978). Nutrition and Metabolism 22, 101112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar