Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T08:00:47.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of the independent and combined effects of xylitol and polydextrose consumed as a snack on hunger and energy intake over 10 d

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2007

Neil A. King*
Affiliation:
BioPsychology Group, Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Stuart A. S. Craig
Affiliation:
Danisco Inc., Ardsley NY 10 502, USA
Tammy Pepper
Affiliation:
Danisco Inc., Ardsley NY 10 502, USA
John E. Blundell
Affiliation:
BioPsychology Group, Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Neil A. King, fax +44 113 3435749, email n.king@leeds.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The study assessed the independent and combined effect of two speciality carbohydrates (polydextrose and xylitol) on appetite. Eight female and seven male lean volunteers were recruited from the University of Leeds campus. Using a repeated measures design, volunteers completed four conditions in a counterbalanced order. Each condition varied according to the yoghurt formulation administered: a control yoghurt (C, yoghurt+25 g sucrose) and three experimental yoghurts (X, yoghurt+25 g xylitol; P, yoghurt+25 g polydextrose; and XP, yoghurt+12·5 g xylitol and 12·5 g polydextrose). Each condition lasted for 10 d during which volunteers consumed 200 g yoghurt on each day. On days 1 and 10, the short- and medium-term effects of yoghurt consumption were assessed by measuring ad libitum lunch intake and subjective motivation to eat. The three experimental yoghurts (X, P and XP) induced a slight suppression of energy intake compared with the control (C) yoghurt, but the differences were not statistically significant. However, when the energy content of the yoghurt pre-loads were accounted for, there was a significant suppression of energy intake for P compared with C (P=0·002). The XP yoghurt induced a significantly stronger satiating effect (increase in subjective fullness) compared with C, both with (P=0·003) and without (P<0·001) the differential in energy content of the yoghurt pre-loads accounted for. The study demonstrated that pre-loads of xylitol and polydextrose caused a mild increase in satiety and suppression of energy intake, and that the effects persist after repeated daily administration. The effects exerted by the formulations containing xylitol and polydextrose did not arise from the differences in energy content of the yoghurt per se. Therefore, the usefulness of xylitol and polydextrose as ingredients in functional foods for appetite control are as a result of their lower energy content and suppression of appetite.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2005

References

Blundell, JE, Burley, VJ, Cotton, JR & Lawton, CL (1993) Dietary fat and the control of energy intake: evaluating the effects of fat on meal size and postmeal satiety. Am J Clin Nutr 57, 772S778S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blundell, JE, Cooling, J & King, NA (2002) Differences in postprandial responses to fat and carbohydrate loads in habitual high and low fat consumers (phenotypes). Br J Nutr 88, 125132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delargy, HJ, Lawton, CL, Smith, FC, King, NA & Blundell, JE (1996) Electronic Appetite Rating System (EARS): validation of continuous automated monitoring of motivation to eat. Int J Obes 20, Suppl. 4104.Google Scholar
Elia, M & Livesey, G (1992) Energy expenditure and fuel selection in biological systems. World Rev Nutr Diet 70, 68131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster-Powell, K, Holt, SHA, Brand-Miller, JC (2002) International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, SM, Wales, JK, Lawton, CL & Blundell, JE (2000) Comparison of high-fat and high-carbohydrate foods in a meal or snack on short-term fat and energy intakes in obese women. Br J Nutr 84, 521530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, AJ & Blundell, JE (1986) Macronutrients and satiety: the effects of high carbohydrate and high protein meals on subjective motivation to eat and preferences. Nutr Behav 3, 133144.Google Scholar
King, NA, Lluch, A, Stubbs, RJ & Blundell, JE (1997) High dose exercise does not increase hunger or energy intake in free living males. Eur J Clin Nutr 51, 478483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawton, CL, Delargy, HJ, Brockman, J, Smith, FC & Blundell, JE (2000) The degree of saturation of fatty acids influences post-ingestive satiety. Br J Nutr 83, 473482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prentice, AM & Poppitt, SD (1996) Importance of energy density and macronutrients in the regulation of energy intake. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 20, S18S23.Google ScholarPubMed
Rogers, PJ & Blundell, JE (1989) Separating the actions of sweetness and calories: effects of saccharin and carbohydrates on hunger and food intake in human subjects. Physiol Behav 45, 10931099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salminen, EK, Salminen, SJ, Porkka, L, Kwasowski, P, Marks, V & Koivistoinen, PE (1989) Xylitol vs glucose: effect on the rate of gastric emptying and motilin, insulin, and gastric inhibitory polypeptide release. Am J Clin Nutr 49, 12281232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shafer, RB, Levine, AS, Marlette, JM & Morley, JE (1987) Effects of xylitol on gastric emptying and food intake. Am J Clin Nutr 45, 744747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stubbs, RJ, Hughes, DA, Johnstone, AM, Rowley, E, Ferris, S, Elia, M, Stratton, RJ, King, NA & Blundell, JE (2001) Description and evaluation of a Newton-based electronic appetite rating system for temporal tracking of appetite in human subjects. Physiol Behav 72, 615619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stunkard, AJ & Messick, S (1985) The three factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res 29, 7183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed