Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T16:00:47.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Digestive development of the early-weaned pig

2. Effect of level of food intake on digestive enzyme activity during the immediate post-weaning period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

D. Kelly
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Agricultural Chemistry, The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
J. A. Smyth
Affiliation:
Veterinary Research Laboratory, Stoney Road, Stormont, Belfast BT4 3SD
K. J. Mccracken
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Agricultural Chemistry, The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX Food and Agricultural Chemistry Research Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Gastric intubation was adopted as a means of comparing the effect of two feeding levels, continuous nutrient supply (C) and restricted nutrient supply (R), on the digestive development of pigs weaned at 14 d of age, during the first 5 d post-weaning. The absolute weights of the stomach and the pancreas were significantly greater (P < 0.001) in C compared with R pigs. The effect was not significant for pancreas weight when expressed per kg body-weight but was significant (P < 0.05) for stomach weight. The weights of the small intestine (SI), SI mucosa and total mucosal protein were significantly higher (P < 0.001) in C pigs but protein content per g mucosa was similar in the C and R groups. There was no significant effect of treatment on the activity of lactase (β-glucosidase; EC 3.2.1.23) or sucrase (sucrose-α-glucosidase; EC 3.2.1.48) irrespective of the basis of comparison used. The specific activity (μmol/min per g protein) of maltase (α-glucosidase; EC 3.2.1.20) and of glucoamylase (glucan-1,4-α-glucosidase; EC 3.2.1.3) were similar in C and R groups but activities of maltase (μmol/g mucosa) (P < 0.05), and maltase and glucoamylase (mol/d) (P < 0.01) were significantly higher in C pigs. Villous height and crypt depth were significantly greater in C pigs (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05 respectively). Enteroglucagon was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in C compared with R pigs. Xylose absorption and the digestibility of energy were not affected by treatment. Digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein (nitrogen x 6.25) and carbohydrate were significantly higher (P < 0.001, P < 0.01, P < 0.05 and P < 0.001 respectively) in R pigs compared with C pigs but the differences were small, ranging from 1.3 to 2.5 %. These results demonstrate that (1) nutrient intake in the weaned pig affects the anatomy, morphology and function of the gut, (2) there is considerable ‘spare capacity’ for digestion of cereal-based diets even in pigs weaned at 14 d of age, (3) measurements in vitro of digestive function are of limited value unless supported by information in vivo on absorption/digestibility.

Type
Development of Intestinal Function
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1991

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, C. B., Kitts, W. D. & Wood, A. J. (1956). The development of the digestive enzyme system of the pig during its pre-weaning phase of growth. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 36, 5158.Google Scholar
Buchanan, K. D. (1973). Studies on the pancreatic-enteric hormones. PhD Thesis, The Queen's University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Corring, T., Aumaitre, A. & Durand, G. (1978). Development of digestive enzymes in piglets from birth to 8 weeks. I. Pancreas and pancreatic enzymes. Nutrition and Metabolism 22, 231243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deren, J. J., Broitman, S. A. & Zamcheck, N. (1967). Effect of diet upon intestinal disaccharidases and disaccharide absorption. Journal of Clinical Investigation 46, 186195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hampson, D. J. (1983). Post-weaning changes in piglet small intestine in relation to growth check and diarrhoea. PhD Thesis, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Hill, F. W. G., Kidder, D. E. & Frew, J. (1970). A xylose absorption test for the dog. Veterinary Research 87, 250255.Google ScholarPubMed
Howard, F. & Yudkin, J. (1963). Effect of dietary change upon the amylase and trypsin activities of the rat pancreas. British Journal of Nutrition 17, 281294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, D., Green, J. A., O'Brien, J. J. & McCracken, K. J. (1984). Gavage feeding of early-weaned pigs to study the effect of diet on digestive development and changes in intestinal microflora. Proceedings of VIIIth International Pig Veterinary Society Congress, Ghent, p. 317 [Tensaert, M., Hoorens, J., Lampo, P. H., Onte, P. B., Coussement, W. and Debonck, P., editors]. Casinoplein, Ghent, Belgium: Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, State University of Ghent.Google Scholar
Kelly, D., Smyth, J. A. & McCracken, K. J. (1991). Digestive development of the early-weaned pig. I. Effect of continuous nutrient supply on the development of the digestive tract and on changes in digestive enzyme activity during the first week post-weaning. British Journal of Nutrition 65, 169180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidder, D. E. & Manners, M. J. (1980). The level and distribution of carbohydrases in the small intestine mucosa of pigs from 3 weeks of age to maturity. British Journal of Nutrition 43, 141153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCracken, K. J. (1984). Effect of diet composition on digestive development of early-weaned pigs. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 43, 109A.Google Scholar
McCracken, K. J., Eddie, S. M. & Walker, N. (1980). Effect of flaked maize in diets for early-weaned pigs on performance to 6 weeks of age. Animal Production 30, 8594.Google Scholar
McCracken, K. J. & Patterson, D. C. (1980). Utilization of skim milk based diets containing ground wheat by pigs weaned at 10 d. Record of Agricultural Research 28, 99102.Google Scholar
Manners, M. J. & Stevens, J. A. (1972). Changes from birth to maturity in the pattern of distribution of lactase and sucrase activity in the mucosa of the small intestine of pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 28, 113127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nir, I., Nitsan, Z. & Vax, A. (1973). The influence of force-feeding and of protein supplementation to the diet on the metabolisable energy of diets, digestibility of nutrients, nitrogen retention and digestive enzyme output in geese. Annals de Biologie Animale, Biochimie, Biophysique 13, 465479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitsan, Z., Dror, Y., Nir, I. & Shapira, N. (1974). The effect of force-feeding on enzymes of the liver, kidney, pancreas and digestive trace of chicks. British Journal of Nutrition 32, 241247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosensweig, N. S. & Herman, R. H. (1969). Diet and disaccharides. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 22, 99102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, R. G., Ekstrom, K. E. & Mahan, D. C. (1980). Effect of weaning age and feeding method on digestive enzyme development in swine from birth to 10 weeks. Journal of Animal Science 50, 257265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. W. (1984). Effect of post-natal development and weaning upon the capacity of pig intestinal villi to transport alanine. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 625633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. W., Miller, B. G., James, P. S. & Bourne, F. J. (1985). Effect of weaning on the structure and function of piglet small intestine. Proceedings of 3rd International Seminar on Digestive Physiology in the Pig, Copenhagen, pp. 7578 [Just, A., Jorgenson, H. and Fernandez, J. A., editors]. Landhusholdningsselkskabets Forlag: Trykt i Frederiksberg Bogtrykkeri.Google Scholar
Trinder, P. (1975). Micro-determination of xylose in plasma. Analyst 100, 1215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Utlenthal, L. D. (1985). The gut hormone response to food. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 44, 5361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. (1984). Milk and the newborn animal. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 43, 87100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed