Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:13:13.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative studies on the digestive physiology of sheep fed on semi-purified or roughage-concentrate diets

1. Food and water intake, rumen volume and rates of parotid secretion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M. J. Lawlor
Affiliation:
Institut für Physiologie und Ernährung der Tiere, Universität München, Germany
D. Giesecke
Affiliation:
Institut für Physiologie und Ernährung der Tiere, Universität München, Germany
Karin Walser-KÄrst
Affiliation:
Institut für Physiologie und Ernährung der Tiere, Universität München, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The food and water intake and diurnal variations in the rumen contents were measured in sheep with rumen fistulas receiving semi-purified or pelleted roughage-concentrate diets. The rates of secretion and composition of parotid saliva of the sheep on both diets and of sheep fed on hay were determined. The sheep had continuous access to the diet. 2. The mean daily intakes of the semi-purified and roughage-concentrate diets were 920 and 2234 g respectively. The corresponding water intakes were 2.50 and 6.05 1.3. Noneof the sheep ruminated on either diet. The weight of total contents and of dry matter in the rumen was highest in animals on the roughage-concentrate diet, and marked diurnal fluctuations, which reflect the eating habits of these animals, were observed. The semi-purified diet appeared to have a very marked water-retaining capacity in the rumen. 4. The estimated daily total secretion of both parotid glands was 2.7, 5.4 and 11.5 1. in sheep fed on the semi-purified diet, roughage-concentrate and hay respectively. No appreciable differences were observed in the composition of parotid saliva between the three groups of sheep. In sheep receiving hay, saliva secretion was lower during eating than between periods of eating, during part of which time the sheep presumably ruminated. 5. It is concluded that the observed differences in parotid secretion reflected differences in the physical form of the diet.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1966

References

REFERENCES

Agrawala, I. P., Duncan, C. W. & Huffman, C. F. (1953). J. Nutr. 49, 29.Google Scholar
Ash, R. W. & Kay, R. N. B. (1959). J. Physiol. 149, 43.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. B. & Balch, C. C. (1961). Br. J. Nutr. 15, 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, F. R. & Lawn, A. M. (1957). Br. J. Anim. Behav. 5, 85.Google Scholar
Brüggemann, J., Walser-Kärst, K. & Giesecke, D. (1965). Z. Tierphys. Tierernähr. u. Futtermittelk. 20, 295.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. L., Greenhalgh, J. F. D., Gwynn, P. E. & Walker, D. (1958). Br. J. Nutr. 12, 266.Google Scholar
Fiske, C. H. & Subbarow, J. (1925). J. bid. Chem. 66, 375.Google Scholar
Hinsberg, K. & Lang, K. (1957). Medizinische Chemie, 3rd ed. München-Berlin-Wien: Urban & Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
Hydén, S. (1961). In Digestiwe Physiology and Nutrition of the Ruminant, p. 35. [Lewis, D., editor.] London: Buttenvorths.Google Scholar
Kay, R. N. B. (1960). J. Physiol. 150, 515.Google Scholar
Lawlor, M. J., Smith, W. H. & Beeson, W. M. (1963). J. Anim. Sci. 22, 481.Google Scholar
Neish, A. C. (1952). Rep. natn. Res. Coun. Can. no. 46–8–3.Google Scholar
Oltjen, R. R., Sirny, R. J. & Tillman, A. D. (1962). J. Anim. Sci. 21, 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, F. D. & Snell, C. T. (1959). Colorimetric Methods of Analysis, 3rd ed. Vol. 2. Toronto, Princeton, New York, and London: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. D. (1963). Aust. J. agric. Res. 14, 680.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. D. & Tribe, D. E. (1963). Aust. J. agric. Res. 14, 670.Google Scholar