Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Contents:

Information:

  • Access
  • Cited by 2

Actions:

      • Send article to Kindle

        To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

        Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

        Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

        Assessing iodine intakes in pregnancy: why does this matter?
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Dropbox

        To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

        Assessing iodine intakes in pregnancy: why does this matter?
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Google Drive

        To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

        Assessing iodine intakes in pregnancy: why does this matter?
        Available formats
        ×
Export citation

The study by Condo et al. ( 1 ) in this issue of the British Journal of Nutrition assessed the utility of a forty-four-item FFQ for use in determining the iodine intake of pregnant Australian women. This is the first such study designed specifically for pregnancy. A strength of the study was the administration of the FFQ at two different time points in gestation, which allowed for assessment of the reproducibility of results. The study validated the FFQ against multiple standards, including spot and 24 h urinary iodine concentrations, measurements of serum thyroglobulin and thyroid function tests (although thyroid function tends to be poorly correlated with iodine intake), and 4-d weighed food records.

Why is the accurate ascertainment of iodine intake in pregnant women important? First, pregnant women and their fetuses are particularly vulnerable to the effects of iodine deficiency disorders. Adequate maternal iodine intake is essential for normal fetal neurodevelopment. Worldwide, iodine deficiency remains the leading preventable cause of intellectual impairments( 2 ). Severe iodine deficiency is associated with an increased risk for stillbirth, miscarriage, congenital anomalies and perinatal mortality( 3 ). Even mild iodine deficiency has recently been linked to lowered intelligence quotient and school performance( 4 , 5 ). Second, both iodine requirements and typical diets are different in pregnant compared with non-pregnant adults. Pregnant women need increased iodine intake due to increased thyroid hormone production, increased renal losses and transfer of iodine to the fetus( 6 ). In non-pregnant adults, the recommended daily iodine intake is 150 μg( 2 , 7 , 8 ). In Australia and New Zealand, the reference dietary intake for iodine in pregnancy is 220 μg/d, similar to the 220 μg/d RDA set by the US Institute of Medicine, and the 250 μg daily intake recommended by the WHO( 2 , 7 , 8 ). By contrast, the UK fails to recommend increased iodine intake in pregnancy, defining the reference nutrient intake as only 140 μg/d during gestation( 9 ).

Assessing the iodine status of individuals is challenging due to the lack of an individual biomarker. Although median urinary iodine concentrations can be used to assess the iodine status of populations, the marked day-to-day variability in typical iodine excretion means that ten urine samples are needed in order to estimate an individual's iodine status with reasonable precision( 10 ). Blood thyroglobulin measurements have been established as an index of population iodine status in school-aged children, but not in pregnant women. Iodine is found in a wide variety of foods; however, in many regions, iodine content in food is both highly variable and unlabelled. Data from a well-validated FFQ could complement the use of biomarkers for population studies in pregnancy. A FFQ on iodine intake could also potentially inform recommendations for individual patients, although, given the many competing demands on provider time, a forty-four-item questionnaire may be impractical for use in the clinical setting.

Assessing iodine intake in pregnancy is currently of particular importance in Australia. Although historically iodine deficiency was recorded in Australia, by the 1980s, Australia appeared to be iodine sufficient, probably as a result of the use of iodophor cleansers by the dairy industry( 11 ). Since the 1980s, the use of iodophors in the dairy industry has declined. Several studies performed in the last 15 years demonstrated mild-to-moderate iodine deficiency among pregnant women in different regions of Australia( 11 16 ). In response to these data, starting in October 2009, the use of iodised salt was mandated in Australia and New Zealand for making all breads except organic bread. Due to concerns that this approach might not be adequate to meet the increased iodine requirements of pregnancy, starting in 2010, the National Health and Medical Research Council recommended that all Australian women who are pregnant, breast-feeding or considering pregnancy should take a daily supplement of 150 μg of iodine( 17 ). The data from Condo et al. ( 1 ) suggest that this recommendation has not been universally adopted; only 75 % of the pregnant women in their study have reported the use of iodine-containing supplements. This is consistent with recent surveys demonstrating poor knowledge about the importance of iodine in pregnancy among both pregnant women and their health care providers( 18 , 19 ). Reassuringly, the median spot urinary iodine concentration in the study by Condo et al. ( 1 ) was 212 μg/l, consistent with iodine sufficiency by WHO criteria( 2 ). Urinary iodine concentrations were significantly lower in the twenty-four women who did not report ingesting iodine-containing supplements. Another recent Australian study has similarly demonstrated iodine sufficiency among only those pregnant women who were ingesting iodine-containing supplements( 20 ). FFQ along with urinary iodine measurements could be utilised to gain a better understanding of both current iodine status and iodine sources among pregnant and lactating Australian women.

Condo et al. ( 1 ) suggest that their FFQ might be adapted for use in industrialised countries other than Australia. The re-emergence of mild-to-moderate iodine deficiency has occurred in recent years in several developed regions. For example, endemic goitre was eliminated in the UK by the 1980s in what has been described as an ‘accidental public health triumph,’ through a combination of the increased use of iodine by the dairy industry and increased intakes of milk by the population( 21 , 22 ). However, probably due to more recent declines in milk drinking, studies now indicate mild iodine deficiency in UK adolescent girls and pregnant women( 23 25 ). Although the US population has been iodine-sufficient overall for decades, the most recent national surveys have demonstrated mild iodine deficiency among pregnant women( 26 ), and daily iodine supplements have been recommended for women who are pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy( 27 , 28 ). The FFQ might be especially relevant for countries such as Denmark, which, similar to Australia, has mandated the use of iodised salt in breads, but where iodine deficiency in pregnancy may persist( 29 ).

The most important limitation of the study of Condo et al. ( 1 ) was its inability to assess iodine intakes from iodised salt, the use of which was reported by 47 % of the women in the study. Salt iodisation has been the mainstay of iodine deficiency prevention efforts globally, and is a critically important source of dietary iodine in many regions worldwide. Although supplement use was not included in the FFQ, it was assessed separately. Inclusion of information about supplements would be important for use of the FFQ as a clinical or research instrument in many settings. Development of the FFQ was informed by an up-to-date Australian food composition database based on analytical data( 30 ). Unfortunately, such data, which would be required to adapt the FFQ for use in other regions, are not universally available. Development of accurate food composition data for iodine will be a necessary first step for the development of FFQ instruments to assess the intakes of iodine by pregnant women in other regions.

References

1 Condo, D, Makrides, M, Skeaff, S, et al. (2015) Development and validation of an iodine-specific FFQ to estimate iodine intake in Australian pregnant women. Br J Nutr 113, 944952.
2 WHO, UNICEF & ICCIDD (2007) Assessment of Iodine Deficiency Disorders and Monitoring their Elimination. A Guided for Programme Managers, 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization.
3 Zimmermann, MB & Boelaert, K (2015) Iodine deficiency and thyroid disorders. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (Epublication ahead of print version 12 January 2015) .
4 Hynes, KL, Otahal, P, Hay, I, et al. (2013) Mild iodine deficiency during pregnancy is associated with reduced educational outcomes in the offspring: 9-year follow-up of the gestational iodine cohort. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98, 19541962.
5 Bath, SC, Steer, CD, Golding, J, et al. (2013) Effect of inadequate iodine status in UK pregnant women on cognitive outcomes in their children: results from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Lancet 27, 331337.
6 Glinoer, D (2007) The importance of iodine nutrition during pregnancy. Public Health Nutr 10, 15421546.
7 Institute of Medicine (2001) Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
8 National Health and Medical Research Council (2006) Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand, Including Recommended Dietary Intakes. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
9 Department of Health (2001) Dietary Reference Values for Food, Energy and Nutrients in the United Kingdom. London: HMSO.
10 König, F, Andersson, M, Hotz, K, et al. (2011) Ten repeat collections for urinary iodine from spot samples or 24-hour samples are needed to reliably estimate individual iodine status in women. J Nutr 141, 20492054.
11 Li, M, Ma, G, Boyages, SC, et al. (2001) Re-emergence of iodine deficiency in Australia. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 10, 200203.
12 Travers, CA, Guttikonda, K, Norton, CA, et al. (2006) Iodine status in pregnant women and their newborns: are our babies at risk of iodine deficiency? Med J Aust 184, 617620.
13 Burgess, JR, Seal, JA, Stilwell, GM, et al. (2007) A case for universal salt iodisation to correct iodine deficiency in pregnancy: another salutary lesson from Tasmania. Med J Aust 186, 574576.
14 Hamrosi, MA, Wallace, EM & Riley, MD (2005) Iodine status in pregnant women living in Melbourne differs by ethnic group. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 14, 2731.
15 McElduff, A, McElduff, P, Gunton, JE, et al. (2002) Neonatal thyroid-stimulating hormone concentrations in northern Sydney: further indications of mild iodine deficiency? Med J Aust 176, 317320.
16 Blumenthal, N, Byth, K & Eastman, CJ (2012) Iodine intake and thyroid function in pregnant women in a private clinical practice in northwestern Sydney before mandatory fortification of bread with iodised salt. J Thyroid Res 2012, 798963.
17 Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (2010) Iodine supplementation for pregnant and breastfeeding women. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/new45_statement.pdf.
18 Lucas, CJ, Charlton, KE, Brown, L, et al. (2014) Antenatal shared care: are pregnant women being adequately informed about iodine and nutritional supplementation? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 54, 515521.
19 Martin, JC, Savige, GS & Mitchell, EK (2014) Health knowledge and iodine intake in pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 54, 312316.
20 Charlton, KE, Yeatman, H, Brock, E, et al. (2013) Improvement in iodine status of pregnant Australian women 3 years after introduction of a mandatory iodine fortification programme. Prev Med 57, 2630.
21 Phillips, DIW (1997) Iodine, milk, and the elimination of endemic goiter in Britain: the story of an accidental public health triumph. J Epidemiol Community Health 51, 391393.
22 Vanderpump, M (2014) Thyroid and iodine nutritional status: a UK perspective. Clin Med 14, Suppl. 6, s7s11.
23 Vanderpump, MP, Lazarus, JH, Smyth, PP, et al. (2011) Iodine status of UK schoolgirls: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 377, 20072012.
24 Bath, SC, Walter, A, Taylor, A, et al. (2014) Iodine deficiency in pregnant women living in the South East of the UK: the influence of diet and nutritional supplements on iodine status. Br J Nutr 111, 16221631.
25 Pearce, EN, Lazarus, JH, Smyth, PP, et al. (2010) Perchlorate and thiocyanate exposure and thyroid function in first-trimester pregnant women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95, 32073215.
26 Caldwell, KL, Pan, Y, Mortensen, ME, et al. (2013) Iodine status in pregnant women in the National Children's Study and in U.S. women (15–44 years), National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005–2010. Thyroid 23, 927937.
27 Stagnaro-Green, A, Abalovich, M, Alexander, E, et al. (2011) Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease during pregnancy and postpartum. Thyroid 21, 10811125.
28 De Groot, L, Abalovich, M, Alexander, EK, et al. (2012) Management of thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy and postpartum: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97, 25432565.
29 Andersen, SL, Sørensen, LK, Krejbjerg, A, et al. (2014) Iodine status in Danish pregnant and breastfeeding women including studies of some challenges in urinary iodine status evaluation. J Trace Elem Med Biol (Epublication ahead of print version 2 December 2014) .
30 Food Standards Australia and New Zealand (2011) NUTTABB 2010 – Australian Food Composition Tables. Canberra: Food Standards Australia and New Zealand.