Skip to main content Accessibility help

Computing Bonus–Malus Premiums under Partial Prior Information

  • E. Gómez-Déniz (a1), L. Bermúdez and I. Morillo


The use of classical bonus–malus systems entails very high maluses and other problems which, during recent years, have been criticised by actuaries. To avoid these problems, new bonus–malus models have been developed. For instance, it is well known that the use of an exponential loss function reduces the differences between overcharges and undercharges, solving the problem of high maluses. In order to measure the sensitivity of the exponential bonus–malus system, and according to robust Bayesian analysis, we first model the structure function by specifying a subclass of the generalised moments class. We then examine the range of relativities for each prior. Finally, we illustrate our method with a numerical example based on real data.



Hide All
Bermúdez, Ll., Denuit, M. & Dhaene, J. (2001). Exponential bonus–malus systems integrating a priori risk classification. Journal of Actuarial Practice, 9, 6798.
Betrò, B., Ruggeri, F. & Meczarski, M. (1994). Robust Bayesian analysis under generalized moments conditions. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 41, 257266.
Dionne, G. & Vanasse, C. (1992). Automobile insurance ratemaking in the presence of asymmetrical information. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 7, 149165.
Eichenauer, J., Lehn, J. & Rettig, S. (1988). A gamma–minimax result in credibility theory. Insurance: Mathematics & Economics, 7, 1, 4957.
Gisler, A. (1996). Bonus–malus and tariff segmentation. Paper presented at the XXVIIth Astin colloquium.
Gomez, E., Hernandez, A. & Vazquez, F. (2001). Robust Bayesian premium principles in actuarial science. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (The Statistician, Series D), 49, 2, 241252.
Gomez, E., Perez, J., Hernandez, A. & Vazquez, F. (2002). Measuring sensitivity in a bonus–malus system. Insurance: Mathematics & Economics, 31, 1, 105113.
Gustafson, P. (1996a). Local sensitivity of posterior expectations. The Annals of Statistics, 24, 1, 174195.
Gustafson, P. (1996b). Local sensitivity of inferences to prior marginals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 434, 774781.
Lemaire, J. (1979). How to define a bonus–malus system with an exponential utility function. Astin Bulletin, 10, 274282.
Makov, U. (1995). Loss robustness via Fisher-weighted squared errors loss function. Insurance: Mathematics & Economics, 16, 1, 16.
Meng, Y. & Whitmore, G. (1999). Accounting for individual over-dispersion in a bonus–malus automobile insurance system. Astin Bulletin, 29, 2, 327337.
Moreno, E., Bertolino, F. & Racugno, W. (2003). Bayesian inference under partial prior information. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 39, 565580.
Morillo, I. & Bermúdez, Ll. (2003). Bonus–malus system using an exponential loss function with an Inverse Gaussian distribution. Insurance: Mathematics & Economics, 33, 4957.
Ríos, S., Martín, J., Ríos, D. & Ruggeri, F. (1999). Bayesian forecasting for accident proneness evaluation. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 99, 134156.
Sivaganesan, S. & Berger, J.O. (1989). Ranges of posterior measures for priors with unimodal contaminations. Annals of Statistics, 17, 2, 868889.
Tremblay, L. (1992). Using the Poisson inverse Gaussian in bonus–malus systems. Astin Bulletin, 22, 1, 97106.
Winkler, G. (2000). Moment sets of bell-shaped distributions: extreme points, extremal decomposition and Chebysheff inequalities. Math. Nachr, 215, 161184.
Young, V. (1998). Robust Bayesian credibility using semiparametric models. Astin Bulletin, 28, 1, 187203.


Computing Bonus–Malus Premiums under Partial Prior Information

  • E. Gómez-Déniz (a1), L. Bermúdez and I. Morillo


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed