Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:40:38.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RIB I, 2334*: An Alleged Inscription from Chichester Reconsidered

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2013

John Magilton †
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

RIB I, 2334* purports to be a dedication by Sallustius Lucullus, governor of Britain in the first century a.d. This paper considers arguments for and against its authenticity, coming to the conclusion that is in fact a forgery. The author also argues against Russell's contention that RIB I, 2334* and I, 90 taken together suggest that Lucullus was the son of Amminus and grandson of Cunobelinus.

Keywords

Roman BritaininscriptionsforgeriesChichesterSallustius LucullusAdminius/AmminusSuetonius
Type
Articles
Information
Britannia , Volume 44 , November 2013 , pp. 85 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2013. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adkins, L., and Adkins, R.A. 1996: Dictionary of Roman Religion, New York Google Scholar
Alcock, J.P. 1986: ‘The concept of Genius in Roman Britain’, in Henig and King 1986, 113–33Google Scholar
Allen, D.F. 1976: ‘Did Adminius strike coins?’, Britannia 7, 96–100 Google Scholar
Birley, A.R. 1981: The Fasti of Roman Britain, Oxford Google Scholar
Black, E. 1987: The Roman Villas of South-East England, BAR British Series 171, Oxford Google Scholar
Blagg, T.F.C. 1990: ‘Architectural munificence in Britain: the evidence of inscriptions’, Britannia 21, 13–32 Google Scholar
Bogaers, J. 1979: ‘King Cogidubnus in Chichester: another reading of RIB 91’, Britannia 10, 243–54Google Scholar
Camden, W. 1600: Britannia (5th edn, Latin), London Google Scholar
Camden, W. 1607: Britannia (7th edn, Latin), London Google Scholar
Camden, W. 1637: Britannia (trans. Holland, Philémon), London Google Scholar
Carson, R.A.G. 1980: Principal Coins of the Romans Vol. 2: The Principate, 31 BC–296 AD, London Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. 1971: Excavations at Fishbourne 1961–1969, Vol. I: The Site, Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London 26, London CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Down, A. 1974: Chichester Excavations II, Chichester Google Scholar
Down, A. 1978: Chichester Excavations IV, Chichester Google Scholar
Goodburn, R., and Waugh, H. 1990: The Roman Inscriptions of Britain, I: Inscriptions on Stone. Epigraphic Indexes, Gloucester Google Scholar
Graves, R. (trans.) 1979: The Twelve Caesars by Gaius Suetonius Tranquillus (revised edn), Harmondsworth Google Scholar
Green, M. 1986: ‘Jupiter, Taranis and the solar wheel’, in Henig and King 1986, 65–75 Google Scholar
Henig, M., and King, A. (eds) 1986: Pagan Gods and Shrines of the Roman Empire, Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph 8, Oxford Google Scholar
Henig, M., and Nash, D. 1982: ‘Amminus and the kingdom of Verica’, Oxford Journal of Archaeology 1.2, 243–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hind, J.G.F. 2007: ‘A. Plautius’ campaign in Britain: an alternative reading of the narrative in Cassius Dio (60.19.5–21.2)’, Britannia 38, 93–106 Google Scholar
Nash, D. 1982: ‘Adminius did strike coins’, Oxford Journal of Archaeology 1.1, 111–14Google Scholar
RIB I: Collingwood, R.G. and Wright, R.P.: The Roman Inscriptions of Britain I: Inscriptions on Stone. With Addenda and Corrigenda by R.S.O. Tomlin (new edn, 1995)Google Scholar
RIB III: Tomlin, R.S.O., Wright, R.P. and Hassall, M.W.C., The Roman Inscriptions of Britain, III: Inscriptions on Stone Found or Notified Between 1 January 1955 and 31 December 2006 (2009)Google Scholar
Ross, A. 1974: Pagan Celtic Britain, London Google Scholar
Russell, M. 2006: Roman Sussex, Stroud Google Scholar
Salway, B. 1994: ‘What's in a name? A survey of Roman onomastic practices from c. 700 b.c. to a.d. 700’, Journal of Roman Studies 84, 124–45Google Scholar