No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A quality improvement project to improve handover in the integrated assessment liaison team
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 June 2021
Abstract
Efficient handovers are integral to patient care. Challenges to handover for liaison psychiatry included high patient and staff turnover and varied handover approaches across the multidisciplinary team (MDT).
MDT focus groups and questionnaires explored change ideas. PDSA cycles were used to design a structured handover.
We aimed to:
Reduce handover time to 30 minutes.
Improve communication using the SBAR tool.
Implement a multidisciplinary teaching schedule in the time saved.
Daily measures:
Handover timing
Team Satisfaction (Individuals ranked handover as ‘good’, ‘average’, or ‘poor’)
Weekly measures:
Semi-qualitative questionnaires triangulated areas for improvement.
Emails, posters and team meetings provided team feedback regarding QI progress.
A structured twice-daily handover format incorporating SBAR, allocated handover coordinators and documentation was created. Weekly MDT teaching sessions were developed.
Over 4 weeks, ‘good’ handover ratings increased from 22% to 65%; ‘poor’ ratings decreased from 25% to 8%. Mean handover time decreased from 37 minutes to 28.5.
The team viewed SBAR as a positive efficiency-promoting tool. MDT teaching improved team communication and confidence. Documentation is an area to improve.
Structured handover has promoted efficiency and effective information-sharing amongst the liaison psychiatry team.
Interdisciplinary teaching can promote inclusive team feeling and encourage confidence across the MDT.
- Type
- Quality Improvement
- Information
- BJPsych Open , Volume 7 , Supplement S1: Abstracts of the RCPsych Virtual International Congress 2021, 21–24 June , June 2021 , pp. S192 - S193
- Creative Commons
- This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.