Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:15:40.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Autonomic Dysregulation in Individuals With Psychiatric Disorders and Healthy Controls: Results From the CAP-MEM Observational Cohort

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2022

Tiago Costa*
Affiliation:
Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Sean Hill
Affiliation:
Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Abigail Taylor
Affiliation:
Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Anna Green
Affiliation:
Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Francesca Black
Affiliation:
Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Stuart Watson
Affiliation:
Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Psychiatric disorders are associated with fatigue and with impairment to a range of cognitive domains, including executive functioning, learning, memory and complex attention. Similar impairments are seen in autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysfunction. The aetipathogenic significance of this for psychiatric disorders is unknown. The main aim of the cap-mem study was to characterize the relationships between ANS and cognitive function in a sample of none-clinical controls and people with mental health, neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. The potentially confounding role of medication was included within this analysis.

Methods

The sample was recruited via secondary care mental health trusts. ANS function was assessed using self-report measures of ANS dysfunction symptoms (COMPASS-31) and fatigue (VAFS). Cognitive ability in various domains was measured using a validated, computerised assessment tool (THINC-IT). Psychiatric status and medication status were self-reported, and where possible, disorder severity measured using a rating scale (CGI-S).

Results

Participants with depression had a significantly higher COMPASS-31 and VAFS scores (higher being more severe), with effect sizes being medium to large. Medication did not fully explain the associations observed. Overall, participants with mental health disorders, when compared to healthy controls, had significantly higher levels of cognitive impairment. Levels of ANS dysfunction significantly and positively correlated with cognitive impairment. The severity of the psychiatric disorder significantly correlated with both ANS dysfunction (p < 0.001) and cognitive impairment. These results were found across all cognitive tests (p < 0.05), other than reaction times in the N-back test, a measure of working memory.

Conclusion

Our results show significant association between ANS dysfunction, psychiatric disorders and cognitive impairments. This is consistent with previously published data. There is now a need to understand the underlying mechanisms and the directionality of the associations. If these mechanisms are shared and relate to autonomic dysfunction, targeted treatments addressing this directly could be helpful with mental health disorders and associated burdensome symptoms, such as cognitive impairments and fatigue. This study is part of a wider project assessing cognitive ability and autonomic functioning in psychiatric populations, and investigating treatments that directly address autonomic dysfunction in psychiatric samples, such as non-invasive transauricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS).

Type
Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.