1Malafouris, L. The brain–artefact interface (BAI): a challenge for archaeology and cultural neuroscience. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2010; 5: 264–73.
2Malafouris, L. Metaplasticity and the human becoming: principles of neuroarchaeology. J Anthropol Sci 2010; 88: 49–72.
3Malafouris, L. ‘Neuroarchaeology’: exploring the links between neural and cultural plasticity. Prog Brain Res 2009; 178: 251–9.
4Latour, B. Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artefacts. In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (eds Bijker, WE, Law, J). MIT Press, 1992.
5Miller, D (ed). Material Cultures: Why Some Things Matter. UCL Press, 1998.
6Knappett, C, Malafouris, L. Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach. Springer Science & Business Media, 2008.
7Verbeek, PP. What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Penn State Press, 2005.
8Hicks, D, Beaudry, MC. The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies. OUP Oxford, 2010.
9Bennett, J. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press, 2009. Henare A, Holbraad M, Wastell S (eds). Thinking Through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically. Routledge, 2007.
10Malafouris, L, Renfrew, C. An introduction to the cognitive life of things: archaeology, material engagement and the extended mind. In The Cognitive Life of Things: Recasting the Boundaries of the Mind (eds Malafouris, L, Renfrew, C): 1–12. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2010.
11Turkle S. Evocative Objects: Things we Think With. MIT Press, 2007.
12Ingold, T. Toward an ecology of materials. Annu Rev Anthropol 2012; 41(1): 427–42.
13Röhricht, F, Gallagher, S, Geuter, U, Hutto, DD. Embodied cognition and body psychotherapy: the construction of new therapeutic environments. Sensoria: A J Mind Brain Cult 2014; 10: 11–20.
14Fuchs, T. Embodied cognitive neuroscience and its consequences for psychiatry. Poiesis Prax 2009; 6(3–4): 219–33.
15Hutchins, E. Enaction, imagination, and insight. In Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science: (eds Stewart, J, Gapenne, O, Di Paolo, A) 425–50. MIT Press, 2010.
16Varela, FJ, Thompson, E, Rosch, E. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press, 1991.
17Clark, A. Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. MIT Press, 1998.
18Hutto, DD, Myin, E. Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds Without Content. MIT Press, 2012.
19Gallagher, S. Enactivist Interventions: Rethinking the Mind. Oxford University Press, 2017.
20Fuchs, T. Ecology of the Brain: The Phenomenology and Biology of the Embodied Mind. Oxford University Press, 2017.
21Buse, C, Martin, D, Nettleton, S. Conceptualising ‘materialities of care’: making visible mundane material culture in health and social care contexts. Sociol Health Illn 2018; 40(2): 243–55.
22Malafouris, L. How Things Shape the Mind. MIT Press, 2013.
23Malafouris, L. Mind and material engagement. Phenom Cogn Sci 2019; 18(1): 1–17.
24Malafouris, L. Bringing things to mind: 4Es and material engagement. In The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition (eds Newen, A, de Bruin, L, Shaun, G): 755–71. Oxford University Press, 2018.
25Gibson, J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
26Gallagher, S. The therapeutic reconstruction of affordances. Res Philosophica 2018; 95(4): 719–36.
27Fox, N. Health sociology from post-structuralism to the new materialisms. Health 2016; 20(1): 62–74.
28Newen, A, De Bruin, L, Gallagher, S (eds). The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition. Oxford University Press, 2018.
29Goodwin, C. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. JPrag 2000; 32: 1489–522.
30Woodward, S. Object interviews, material imaginings and ‘unsettling’ methods: interdisciplinary approaches to understanding materials and material culture. Qual Res 2015; 16(4): 359–74.
31Van Lith, T. Art therapy in mental health: a systematic review of approaches and practices. Arts Psychotherapy 2016; 47: 9–22.
32Van Lith, T, Schofield, MJ, Fenner, P. Identifying the evidence-base for art-based practices and their potential benefit for mental health recovery: a critical review. Disabil Rehabil 2013; 35(16): 1309–23.
33Beard, R. Art therapies and dementia care: a systematic review. Dementia 2012; 11(5): 633–56.
34Cousins, E, Tischler, V, Garabedian, C, Dening, T. Principles and features to define and describe arts interventions for people with dementia: a qualitative realist study. Arts Health 2018: 1–17.
35Thomson, LJ, Lockyer, B, Camic, PM, Chatterjee, HJ. Effects of a museum-based social prescription intervention on quantitative measures of psychological wellbeing in older adults. Perspect Public Health 2018; 138(1): 28–38.
36Thomson, LJ, Ander, EE, Menon, U, Lanceley, A, Chatterjee, HJ. Evaluating the therapeutic effects of museum object handling with hospital patients: a review and initial trial of well-being measures. J Appl Arts Health 2011; 2(1): 37–56.
37Chatterjee, H, Noble, G. Museums, Health and Well-Being. Routledge, 2013.
38Mangione, G. The art and nature of health: a study of therapeutic practice in museums. Sociol Health Illn 2018; 40(2): 283–96.
39Mackenzie, J, Bartlett, R, Downs, M. Moving towards culturally competent dementia care: have we been barking up the wrong tree? Rev Clin Gerontol 2015; 15(1): 39–46.
40Bartlett, R, Gjernes, T, Lotherington, AT, Obstefelder, A. Gender, citizenship and dementia care: a scoping review of studies to inform policy and future research. Health Soc Care Commun 2018; 26(1): 14–26.
41Gillespie, A, Best, C, O'Neill, B. Cognitive function and assistive technology for cognition: a systematic review. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2012; 18(1): 1–19.
42Jamieson, M, Cullen, B, McGee-Lennon, M, Brewster, S, Evans, JJ. The efficacy of cognitive prosthetic technology for people with memory impairments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2014; 24(3–4): 419–44.
43Lorenz, K, Freddolino, PP, Comas-Herrera, A, Knapp, M, Damant, J. Technology-based tools and services for people with dementia and carers: mapping technology onto the dementia care pathway. Dementia 2019; 18(2): 725–41.
44Buse, C, Martin, D, Nettleton, S. Conceptualising ‘materialities of care’: making visible mundane material culture in health and social care contexts. Sociol Health Illn 2018; 40(2): 243–55.
45Livingston, G, Sommerlad, A, Orgeta, V, Costafreda, SG, Huntley, J, Ames, D, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet 2017; 390(10113): 2673–734.
46Kontos, PC. Ethnographic reflections on selfhood, embodiment and Alzheimer's disease. Ageing Soc 2004; 24: 829–49.
47Caddell, LS, Clare, L. I'm still the same person: the impact of early-stage dementia on identity. Dementia 2011; 10(3): 379–98.
48Buse, C, Twigg, J. Materialising memories: exploring the stories of people with dementia through dress. Ageing Soc 2016; 36(6): 1115–35.
49Yatczak, J. Everyday material engagement: supporting self and personhood in people with Alzheimer's disease. Phenom Cogn Sci 2018: 1–18.
50Phenice, LA, Griffore, RJ. The importance of object memories for older adults. Educ Gerontol 2013; 39(10): 741–9.
51Dennett, D.C., Kinds of Minds: 138–9. Basic Books, 1996.
52Phenice, LA, Griffore, RJ. The importance of object memories for older adults. Educ Gerontol 2013; 39(10): 742.
53Wapner, S, Demick, J, Redondo, JP. Cherished possessions and adaptation of older people to nursing homes. Int J Aging Hum Dev 1990; 31: 219–35.
54Lovatt, M. Becoming at home in residential care for older people: a material culture perspective. Sociol Health Illn 2018; 40(2): 366–78.
55Cipriani, J, Kreider, M, Sapulak, K, Jacobson, M, Skrypski, M, Sprau, K. Understanding object attachment and meaning for nursing home residents: an exploratory study, including implications for occupational therapy. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 2019; 27(6): 405–22.
56Buse, C, Twigg, J. Materialising memories: exploring the stories of people with dementia through dress. Ageing Soc 2016; 36(6): 1115–35.
57Phillipson, L, Hammond, A. More than talking: a scoping review of innovative approaches to qualitative research involving people with dementia. Sociol Health Illn 2018; 17(1): 1609406918782784.
58Hutchins, E. Cognitive ecology. Top Cogn Sci 2010; 2(4): 705–15.
59Banks, M, Zeitlyn, D. Visual Methods in Social Research (2nd edn.). Sage, 2015.
60Bartlett, R. Modifying the diary interview method to research the lives of people with dementia. Qual Health Res 2012; 22(12): 1717–26.
61Woodward, S. Object interviews, material imaginings and ‘unsettling’ methods: interdisciplinary approaches to understanding materials and material culture. Qual Res 2015; 16(4): 359–74.
62Cunningham, SJ, Turk, DJ, Macdonald, LM, Macrae, CN. Yours or mine? Ownership and memory. Conscious Cogn 2008; 17: 312–8.
63Caddell, LS, Clare, L. Interventions supporting self and identity in people with dementia: a systematic review. Aging Ment Health 2011; 15(7): 797–810.
64Bourgeois, MS, Camp, C, Rose, M, White, B, Malone, M, Carr, J, et al. A comparison of training strategies to enhance use of external aids by persons with dementia. J Commun Disord 2003; 36: 361–78.
65Malafouris, L, Koukouti, MD. How the body remembers its skills: memory and material engagement. J Conscious Stud 2018; 25(7–8): 158–80.
66Hutchins, E. Material anchors for conceptual blends. J Pragmat 2005; 37: 1555–77.
67Rietveld, E, Kiverstein, J. A rich landscape of affordances. Ecol Psychol 2014; 26: 325–52.
68Stern, Y. What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2002; 8: 448–60.
69Harris, CB, Barnier, AJ, Sutton, J, Keil, PG. Couples as socially distributed cognitive systems: remembering in everyday social and material contexts. Memory Stud 2014; 7: 285–97.