Skip to main content Accessibility help

Should psychiatrists write fiction?

  • Henry Bladon (a1)


This paper looks at the relationship between fiction and psychiatry. Specifically, the idea of psychiatrists as fiction writers is explored, and reference is made to various fictional texts to illustrate the problems of stigma and negative imagery. These two main areas of focus are highlighted as ones that the practice of writing fiction might address, and some potential pitfalls are discussed. The paper suggests how psychiatrists might ameliorate the present problems by incorporating their unique clinical skills and knowledge into fictional narratives.

Declaration of interest


  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Should psychiatrists write fiction?
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Should psychiatrists write fiction?
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Should psychiatrists write fiction?
      Available formats


This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (, which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry Bladon (


Hide All
1 Beveridge, A. Should psychiatrists read fiction? Br J Psychiatry 2003; 182(5): 385–7.
2 Oyebode, F. Literature and psychiatry. Psychiatr Bull 2002; 26(4): 121–2.
3 Garcia-Nieto, R. Book Review. Int J Ment Health 2010; 39(1): 99100.
4 Baker, C, Crawford, P, Brown, B, Lipsedge, M, Carter, R. Madness in Post-1945 British and American Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
5 McGrath, P. Trauma. Bloomsbury, 2009.
6 McGrath, P. Asylum. Penguin Books, 1997.
7 McGrath, P. Spider (1st edn). Simon & Schuster, 2015.
8 McGrath, P. Problem of drawing from psychiatry for a fiction writer. Psychiatr Bull 2002; 26(4): 140–3.
9 Miller, D. The Psychiatrist as Writer, 2009 (available from
10 Corrigan, P, Watson, A. Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness. World Psychiatry 2002; 1(1): 1620.
11 McKeown, M, Clancy, B. Media influence on societal perception of mental illness. Ment Health Nurs 1995; 15(2): 1012.
12 Stuart, H. Media portrayal of mental illness and its treatments. CNS Drugs 2006; 20(2): 99106.
13 Clarke, L. Fiction's Madness. PCCS, 2009.
14 Oyebode, F. Fictional narrative and psychiatry. Adv Psychiatr Treat 2004; 10(2): 140–5.
15 Breeze, J. Can paternalism be justified in mental health care? J Adv Nurs 1998; 28(2): 260–5.
16 Moncrieff, J. The Myth of the Chemical Cure: A Critique of Psychiatric Drug Treatment. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
17 Rogers, A, Pilgrim, D. A Sociology of Mental Health and Illness (4th edn). McGraw-Hill Education, 2010.
18 Bentall, R. Doctoring the Mind: Why Psychiatric Treatments Fail. Penguin Books, 2010.
19 Middleton, H. Psychiatry Beyond the Current Paradigm, and DSM-5 - Mad In America, 2012 (available from
20 Johnstone, L. Abolishing Diagnosis | Psychiatric Diagnosis | Mad in America, 2013 (available from
21 Bracken, P, Thomas, P, Timmi, S, Asen, E, Behr, G, Beuster, C, et al. A prescription for psychiatry: why we need a whole new approach to mental health and wellbeing. Br J Psychiatry 2012; 201(6): 430–4.
22 Crawford, P, Baker, C. Literature and madness: fiction for students and professionals. J Med Humanit 2009; 30(4): 237–51.
23 Fuller, E. The Death of Psychiatry. Penguin, 1975.
24 Hobson, J, Leonard, J, Hobson, A. Out of its Mind: Psychiatry in Crisis. Perseus Books, 2001.
25 Eaton, JS, Goldstein, LS. Psychiatry in crisis. Am J Psychiatry 1977; 134(6): 642–5.
26 Hopson, J. The demonisation of psychiatrists in fiction (and why real psychiatrists might want to do something about it). Psychiatr Bull 2014; 38(4): 175–9.
27 Pidd, S. Recruiting and retaining psychiatrists. Adv Psychiatr Treat 2003; 9(6): 405–11.
28 Barkil-Oteo, A. Psychiatry's identity crisis. Lancet 2012; 379(9835): 2428.
29 Rajagopal, S. Psychiatry as a career choice compared with other specialties: a survey of medical students. Psychiatr Bull 2004; 28(12): 444–6.
30 Bickle, A. Fictional narrative and psychiatrists. Adv Psychiatr Treat 2004; 10(6): 479–9.
31 Stevenson, L. Novel penned by social worker aims to show the “impossible task” of social work, 2017 (available from
32 Starkman, M. The End of Miracles (1st edn). SheWrites Press, 2016.
33 Gandolfo, E. It's all make believe: ethics, fiction and a writer's responsibilities. In The Ethical Imaginations: Refereed Conference Papers of the 16th Annual AAWP Conference 2011 (eds Conway-Herron, J, Costello, M, Hawryluk, L). Australasian Association of Writing Programs, 2011.
34 Gandolfo, E. The Robust Imagination, 2006 (available from
35 Beveridge, A. The benefits of reading literature. In Mindreadings: Literature and Psychiatry (1st edn) (ed Ayebode, F). RCPsych, 2009.
36 Beveridge, A. Should psychiatrists read fiction? Br J Psychiatry 2003; 182(5): 385–7.
37 Beveridge, A. Fiction's madness. Br J Psychiatry 2010; 197(4): 337–8.

Should psychiatrists write fiction?

  • Henry Bladon (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Should psychiatrists write fiction?

  • Henry Bladon (a1)
Submit a response


Patients' viewpoints matter most

Stephen Ginn, Consultant Psychiatrist, Camden and Islington Foundation NHS Trust
23 May 2018

Bladon writes (1) that psychiatrists should write fiction, but is silent on specifics. Should all psychiatrists write fiction, along with reflective practice? Should short story recitals periodically usurp academic meetings? Might the freshness of one’s metaphors ever become part of yearly appraisal? One can only hope!

Writing fiction is something that anyone can try however Bladon’s focus is not on the benefits any private writing might hold for an individual, and by extension their patients, but rather on the benefits to society of psychiatrists’ prose when widely read.

I note a pragmatic obstacle to this: writing publishable fiction is a challenging and time-consuming pursuit. Novels typically take years to complete and novelists require tolerance for solitude. When Beveridge writes that psychiatrists should read fiction (2) he posits an activity which can be squeezed into even the tightest of schedules. What Bladon is encouraging is essentially a second job.

This practicality aside I fear that Bladon unduly flatters psychiatrists when he writes of how well placed we are to write fiction. Yes, our practice does bestow a knack for deconstructing and describing behaviour and this will be of use. Yet storytelling demands so much more than this. A proficient novelist requires a distinctive voice, a mastery of plot, an ear for dialogue and a knack for constructing character. Little in our practice lends to automatic proficiency in these skills.

For those with talent and motivation, to what subjects should they turn their skills? It does seem limiting that psychiatrists should have to write about psychiatry – it’s not the only thing we have to talk about. This concern aside I worry about the “principal goals” Bladon proposes for psychiatrist novelists.

“Raising awareness, educating others and promoting good mental health” are very suitable aims for a public health campaign. But an author who writes with such an explicit agenda may produce something which informs, but lacks art. The best writing richly interrogates the world, and is open to multiple interpretations: necessarily it doesn’t give up its meaning to the reader easily.

We must also be careful when seeking to “counter the negative image of psychiatry”. With all the slights, it’s easy to forget that a psychiatrist has a role with power and influence and our voice is generally heard (if not always listened to). Despite good intentions, some people feel deeply wronged by us. Their fictionalized experiences are feedback of sorts and we must be careful not to dismiss this. Our specialty will move forward most effectively if we keep in mind that ultimately it’s our patients’ viewpoints, and not ours, that really matters.


1. Bladon, H. (2018). Should psychiatrists write fiction? BJPsych Bulletin, 42(2), 77-80.

2. Beveridge A. Should psychiatrists read fiction? Br J Psychiatry 2003; 182(5): 385–7.

... More

Conflict of interest: None declared

Write a reply

Should psychiatrists write fiction?

Allan Beveridge, Doctor, British Journal of Psychiatry
23 May 2018

Dear Dr Greg Shields,

While it is pleasant to read an article inspired by a paper I wrote some time ago, it was disappointing to see the author attribute views to me that were exactly the opposite to those I had originally argued.

In his paper, 'Should psychiatrists write fiction?, Henry Bladon misrepresents my original article 'Should psychiatrists read fiction?' BJPsych. 2003. 182.(5): 375-7. He writes: 'Beveridge suggests that writers are attempting to do crudely what modern psychologists do in a sophisticated manner'.

I didn't suggest this. I wrote that this was one particular line of argument. My original paper looked at six arguments in favour and six arguments against the notion that psychiatrists should read fiction. I offered a critique of these arguments. I thought it was clear that these arguments did not represent my position on the matter. How could they? They represented a range of opinions.

After stating one argument that writers are crudely attempting to do what psychologists do in a more sophisticated manner, I write in the next sentence:

'According to Downie & Charlton (1992) it is enough to state this proposition to recognize the absurdity of it'.

After wrongly attributing to me the argument that writers offer a crude version of psychology, Bladon goes on to upbraid me for 'missing the point of fiction'.

It seems to me that it is Bladon who has missed the point. My paper actually comes down on the side of the benefits of psychiatrists reading literature.

Allan Beveridge


Sent from my iPhone
... More

Conflict of interest: None declared

Write a reply


Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *