Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:03:59.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implications of altitudinal migration for conservation strategies to protect tropical biodiversity: a case study of the Resplendent Quetzal Pharomacrus mocinno at Monteverde, Costa Rica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

George V. N. Powell
Affiliation:
RARE Center for Tropical Conservation, 1616 Walnut Street, Suite 911, Philadelphia, PA 19103, U.S.A.
Robin D. Bjork
Affiliation:
National Audubon Society, 115 Indian Mount Trail, Tavernier, FL 33070, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We documented habitat use by the Resplendent Quetzal Pharomacrus mocinno, a large frugivorous bird that breeds in cloud-forests in the highlands of Central America, to assess the adequacy of protection afforded to regional biodiversity by the Monteverde reserve complex, a protected natural area that includes most of the highland forests of the Tilarán mountain range in western Costa Rica. Our results demonstrated that this relatively large (20,000 ha) protected natural area does not adequately protect the area's biodiversity. Through the use of radio-telemetry, we identified the areas on the Pacific slopes that are most critical to altirudinally migrating Quetzals. These forest patches are subject to deforestation and degradation and are rapidly becoming further isolated from other remaining forest. The possibility of the local extirpation of the Quetzal, through continued habitat loss on the Pacific slopes, presents an unusual dilemma for the region because the species is the major attraction for the Ideal tourist industry which now includes over 80 businesses and annually generates over US$5 million in local revenue. Therefore, its extirpation would seriously affect regional economic stability. In order to protect the Monteverde Quetzal population, we propose a regional conservation plan that depends on participation of local landowners to protect their remaining forest fragments and allows for the development of corridors to connect critical habitats as the focus of a regional conservation effort. While the ecological significance of the structure of corridors per se, versus other possible formats, is still being debated, we have selected the corridor format primarily because it is relatively easy for landowners to grasp the concept and the necessity for continuity of the corridor network. This recognition provides an important incentive for participation across property boundaries, promoting cooperation in a group effort rather than as isolated actions. Success of this cooperative plan will provide an example for grass-roots participation in buffer-zone management strategies elsewhere in the Neotropics.

Type
Growing Points in Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation
Copyright
Copyright © Birdlife International 1994

References

Bowes, A., LaBastille, A. and Allen, D. G. (1969) Biology and conservation of the Quet-zal. Biol. Conserv. 1: 297306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, R. G. (1989) CAMRIS: computer aided mapping and resource inventory system. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Hernández, M. de L. A. and Obregón, V. H. H. (1990) Contributión a la biologia y distributión del quetzal Pharomachrus mocinno mocinno en la reserva “El Triunfo”. Chi-apas, Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (unpublished thesis).Google Scholar
Holdridge, L. R. (1987) Life zone ecology. Revised edition. San José, Costa Rica: Tropical Science Center.Google Scholar
LaBastille, A. (1983) Pharomachrus mocinno (Quetzal). Pp.599601 in Janzen, D. H., ed. Costa Ricari natural history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Loiselle, B. A. and Blake, J. G. (1991) Temporal variation in birds and fruits along an elevational gradient in Costa Rica. Ecology 72: 180193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noss, R. F. (1990) From endangered species to biodiversity. In Kohm, K., ed. Balancing on the brink: a retrospective on the Endangered Species Act. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Noss, R. F. and Harris, L. D. (1986) Nodes, networks, and MUMs: preserving diversity at all scales. Environ. Mgmt. 10: 299309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G. V. N. and Bjork, R. D. (in press) Conserving tropical biodiversity: implications of intratropical migration on design theory for protected natural areas. Conserv. Biol. Rojas, C. M. (1992) Monteverde: estudio inicial de los nexos entre la reserva, el turismo y la comunidad local. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. and Cox, J. (1987) Consequences and costs of conservation corridors. Conserv. Biol. 1: 6371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skutch, A. F. (1944) Life history of the quetzal. Condor 46: 213235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, F. G. (1988) Altitudinal movements of bird on the Caribbean slope of Costa Rica: implications for conservation. Pp.243258 in Almeda, F. and Pringle, C. M., eds. Tropical rainforests: diversity and conservation. San Francisco, CA: California Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Tosi, J. A. (1969) Mapa ecológico, República de Costa Rica. San José, Costa Rica: Tropical Science Center.Google Scholar
Wheelwright, N. T. (1983) Fruits and the ecology of resplendent quetzals. Auk 100: 286301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheelwright, N. T., Haber, W. A., Murray, K. G. and Guindon, C. (1984) Tropical fruit-eating birds and their food plants: a survey of a Costa Rican Lower Montane Forest. Biotropica 16: 173192.Google Scholar