Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T06:41:58.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EVOLUTIONARY THEORY AND PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 1997

MICHAEL S. Y. LEE
Affiliation:
Zoology Building, School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
PAUL DOUGHTY
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6907, Australia
Get access

Abstract

The relationship between phylogenetic reconstruction and evolutionary theory is reassessed. It is argued here that phylogenies, and evolutionary principles, should be analysed initially as independently from each other as possible. Only then can they be used to test one another. If the phylogenies and evolutionary principles are totally consistent with one another, this consilience of independent lines of evidence increases confidence in both. If, however, there is a conflict, then one should assess the relative support for each hypothesis, and tentatively accept the more strongly supported one. We review examples where the phylogenetic hypothesis is preferred over the evolutionary principle, and vice versa, and instances where the conflict cannot be readily resolved. Because the analyses of pattern and process must initially be kept separate, the temporal order in which they are performed is unimportant. Therefore, the widespread methodology of always proceeding from cladogram to evolutionary ‘scenario’ cannot be justified philosophically. Such an approach means that cladograms cannot be properly tested against evolutionary principles, and that evolutionary ‘scenarios’ have no independent standing. Instead, we propose the ‘consilience’ approach where phylogenetic and evolutionary hypotheses are formulated independently from each other and then examined for agreement.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Cambridge Philosophical Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)