Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Universal bilingualism

  • Thomas Roeper (a1)

Abstract

Lexically linked domains in language allow a speaker to formulate incompatible rules. How should they be represented theoretically? We argue that a speaker has a set of mini-grammars for different domains so that, in effect, every speaker is bilingual. It is argued that Tense or Agreement Checking, V-2 for quotation, and resumptive pronouns, all lead to bilingual representations. In addition, this perspective on Theoretical Bilingualism suggests that optionality and stages in the acquisition of an initial grammar should also be characterized as a form of bilingualism.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. E-mail: roeper@linguist.umass.edu

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Universal bilingualism

  • Thomas Roeper (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.