Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Semantic competitor priming within and across languages: The interplay of vocabulary knowledge, learning experience and working memory capacity*

  • LI HONG (a1) and BRIAN MACWHINNEY (a2)

Abstract

This paper reports three studies of bilingual lexical processing, using the semantic competitor priming (SCP) method of Lee and Williams (2001). Study 1 found a trend of within-language SCP effect for Chinese–English bilinguals with both higher and lower levels of vocabulary knowledge. There was also a cross-language SCP effect, but this was restricted to bilinguals with a lower level of vocabulary knowledge. Study 2 found a cross-language SCP effect for Chinese learners of English in the classroom context. Study 3 found both within- and cross-language SCP effects for bilinguals with study-abroad experience as well as Chinese–English classroom learners who had a higher working memory capacity. Those findings are interpreted in terms of a dynamic view of bilingual language selection.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence Li Hong, College of Foreign Languages, Chongqing University, Sha Ping Ba, Chongqing, 400044, PR China eeehongli@cqu.edu.cn

Footnotes

Hide All
*

This research was supported by State Scholarship Fund, PR China, the Key Humanities and Social Sciences Fund of Chongqing Education Commission (07SK159) and Research Fund of Research Centre of Language, Cognition and Language Application, Chongqing University. We thank Dr Zhang Fenghui and Miss Ding Jing for their assistance in data collection. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Bialystok, E., & Craik, F. (2010). Structure and process in life-span cognitive development. In Overton, W. (ed.), Handbook of life-span development. Vol 1. Biology, cognition, and methods across the life-span, pp. 3655. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Botvinick, M., & Plaut, D. C. (2006). Short-term memory for serial order: A recurrent neural network model. Psychological Review, 113, 201233.
Contemporary Chinese Dictionary (5th edition, 2005). Beijing: Commercial Press.
Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (1996). Individual differences in working memory capacity: More evidence for a general capacity theory. Memory, 6, 577590.
Costa, A., La Heij, W. & Navarrete, E. (2006). The dynamics of bilingual lexical access. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 137151.
Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Lexical selection in bilinguals: Do words in the bilingual's two lexicons compete for selection? Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 65397.
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 491511.
Cowan, N. (2005). Working memory capacity. New York: Psychology Press.
Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 6781.
Hermans, D., Bongaerts, T., de Bot, K., & Schreuder, R. (1998). Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their first language? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 213229.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychology Review, 99, 122149.
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Wodniecka, Z. (2006). Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 119135.
Kroll, J. F. & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of memory and Language, 33, 149174.
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16, 3351.
Lee, M.-W., & Williams, J. N. (2001) Lexical access in spoken word production by bilinguals: Evidence from the semantic competitor priming paradigm. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 233248.
Li, H. (2003). The effects of L2 vocabulary knowledge on L2 semantic processing. Modern Foreign Languages, 4, 386393.
Li, H. (2004). Effects of working memory capacity on L2 semantic processing. Psychological Science, 27, 620623.
Li, H. (2007) Semantic processing: The L2 lexical competence perspectives. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
MacWhinney, B. (in press). The logic of the Unified Model. In Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.
Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (eds.) (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
Paradis, M. (1987). The assessment of bilingual aphasia. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Prior, A., & MacWhinney, B. (2010). A bilingual advantage in task switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 253262.
Rosen, V. M., & Engle, R. W. (1998). Working memory capacity and suppression. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 418436.
The International Picture Naming Project at CRL-UCSD. <http://crl.ucsd.edu/~aszekely/ipnp/> (retrieved 22 March 2006).
Tokowicz, N., Michael, E. B., & Kroll, J. F. (2004). The role of study-abroad experience and working-memory capacity in the types of errors made during translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 255272.
Wheeldon, L. R. & Monsell, S. (1994). Inhibition of spoken word production by priming a semantic competitor. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 332356.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
  • ISSN: 1366-7289
  • EISSN: 1469-1841
  • URL: /core/journals/bilingualism-language-and-cognition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed