Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:32:23.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Letter detection for homographs with different meanings in different language texts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2004

SETH N. GREENBERG
Affiliation:
Union College
JEAN SAINT-AUBIN
Affiliation:
Université de Moncton

Abstract

Tests of inter-lingual homographs that have different meanings across two languages support models postulating initial non-selective access to competing language representations, e.g. Bilingual Interactive Activation (BIA) model. Most such research assessed inter-lingual homographs in the absence of connected text. Here a letter detection paradigm was used that required subjects to detect letters in words in connected text. Prior work with this paradigm suggested that readers respond to only one interpretation of an intra-lingual homograph when detecting letters. Three experiments described here indicate that letter detection patterns to inter-lingual homographs are similar, i.e. detection reflects only a context appropriate interpretation. However, the demonstration that text role, text cohesiveness and bilingual fluency affect inter-lingual letter detection (Experiments 1 and 2), and that word role affects detection even though target frequency is constant across inter-lingual meanings (Experiment 3) indicates that selectivity is in response to post-lexical processes. Thus, results are seen as compatible with tenets of the BIA model.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported by a discovery grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and by a grant from the Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network (CLLRNet) to Jean Saint-Aubin. We thank Jessica Zuehlke for assistance in running subjects and preparing materials for Experiment 1, and Annie Jalbert for her assistance in running subjects and preparing the materials for Experiments 2 and 3.